Surely Chelsea could have found someone who would pay more than 20m for Werner ?
Would you?
He's crap.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Surely Chelsea could have found someone who would pay more than 20m for Werner ?
But what about his wages? I think I read he was on something ridiculous like 375K/wk because of a CL win bump.Surely Chelsea could have found someone who would pay more than 20m for Werner ?
But what about his wages? I think I read he was on something ridiculous like 375K/wk because of a CL win bump.
As far as I'm concerned Chelsea deserve to be taken on this deal. This kid had to be signed on the back of literally NO scouting...or they just utilized Spurs' dossier.Fuck. Really?
That explains the 20m fee. I would imagine RBL are having to give him a big signing on fee as well because they’re definitely not paying him 375K a week.
Would you?
He's crap.
As far as I'm concerned Chelsea deserve to be taken on this deal. This kid had to be signed on the back of literally NO scouting...or they just utilized Spurs' dossier.
See above. I guess it’s more complicated than 20m. I had no idea he was on 375pw.
I don’t think he’s total crap though. I think he’s a very similar type to Son. Similar flaws (fucking flimsy Without the ball and can bumble about a bit outside the box) and similar strengths (v quick, direct, decent timing, gets into good positions to score). Both need the right set up to be viable. Both need a fulcrum guy next to them. Son’s better at mid range shooting, Werner gets on the end of close range chances more. It’s taken Son almost his whole career to have a 20+ season.
Liverpool wanted him - and in their system, playing off a False 9 - isolating defenders as they do, he could have been effective. Chelsea’s slower build up, with no guy to do the donkey work, less so.
Somewhere like Leicester, in the “Vardy” role might work?
But not for 375pw.
Rubbish...but he can score the odd banger. Think faster Bruno Fernandes. Was good for Valencia for 1 year while on loan from PSG. Since that time, meh. If Wolves play on the counter then he might be productive. But this is a Mendes deal and he's just moving his pieces to new team.Anyone who watches La Liga? Thoughts on Wolves' new signing Guedes from Valencia?
Even if he wasn't on crazy wages... You'd honestly pay north or £20m for a wide fwd that can't score at the top level(*)?
(*It's all very well likening him to Son, but one's a golden boot winner....... The other as a finisher is an object of ridicule in the EPL.)
20m is fuck all relatively speaking.
Top level?
He scored 21/13/16/28 a season for RBL the season Liverpool wanted and Chelsea bought him.
Son had only scored more than 12 once in a season before two seasons ago, including in the Bundesliga.
Liverpool aren’t stupid. They wanted him.
This would be pretty crazy.. I wonder who City have lined up? If they were to go the whole season without an injury, you'd fancy them for the league with what they have. A couple of injuries leaves them very short across four comps.
Or, as bus-conductor suggested previously (though I am loath to bring up moments when he is correct), we could identify respective Fofanas much earlier...IDK but possibly when we were supposedly there giving the once over on Saliba. You would figure that whoever was watching Saliba would get a gander on his CB cohort. That's just poor scouting to focus on 1 player to the exclusion of others on the field. That would have had us in the Fofana stakes before LCFC and for <30M.With Chelsea apparently willing to pay 80m+ for Fofana, should we re-evaluate our stance on paying similar amount for Gvardiol? Or possibly even join the Fofana race?
Seems like the going rate if you want to get the "best of the best". I'm strongly against paying this kind of money, but we've basically got the starting 11 we want except for RWB and LCB, and enough depth.
That final gap seems impossible to fill without splashing out.