I've said even before Sissoko signed the paperwork that we'd have gotten at worst the same from Onomah (it's all in the threads), Sissoko's transfer basically blocked him from playing, BUT Sissoko wasn't or has ever been a catastrophe, he did the role he was asked to perform, he was just OK, meh but catastrophy he has NEVER been. He's put in probably 2 at a push 3 poor performances, during games where at least half the team also played poorly too, but only one man got the flack. You've bassed your entire rhetoric on him around this, you more than any poster in this entire forum still refuses to acknowledge his performances this season just says it all.
BUT, flip the coin over, and what exactly has Onomah done whilst on loan? Answer nothing. I have watched almost every minute of Onomah at Tottenham and of his age group he was the player that showed the greatest promise IMO (more than Winks, Pritchard (I confess I didn't see much of Pritch), Veljkovic, Bentaleb, CCV, Edwards and Walker-Peters), Veljkovic was also mustard.
A lot can happen but as it stands its fair to say KWP, Winks will be the only ones that remain from that group (Amos, Oakley-Booth also question marks) but I think for sure we will finally get to see Poch's vision in greater clarity this summer, by that I'm specifically referring to loaning players vs keeping within the first team squad for training.
But despite my personal disappointment of not seeing Onomah or KWP not playing I'd say he's got it absolutely spot on given none of them is of having pulled up any trees since leaving or gone out on loan, most haven't even held down a spot in their average clubs, then they sure as hell aren't making it at Spurs.
Oh, I like the way you choose to say that Aurier is the player blocking KWP and not Tripps. LOL.