On what basis? Because Eriksen has played more games for us, than Isco has for RM?What is to debate? Eriksen crushes Isco on volume.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
On what basis? Because Eriksen has played more games for us, than Isco has for RM?What is to debate? Eriksen crushes Isco on volume.
As a creator, we can measure how many chances they create. Isco manages 2 per 90. Eriksen 3. There are 12 players in Europe this year who have made more than Eriksen per 90. There are 112 more than Isco.He is a different player to both, he can be very creative but the thing that stands out is his ability to play in tight spaces against multiple opponents, he is very strong and skilful on the ball.
He is the type of player who is good against packed defences, as he weaves between them not with pace but with skill, power and brains. We don't have that.
Not sure if David Silva is an exact comparison but more than way than Eriksen or Dele.
Isco has played over 1000 minutes in a Real Madrid side that gives him Ronaldo, Bale, Kroos, Modric and Benzema to pass to. He creates 2/3 of the rate than Eriksen manages per 90 minutes. It's not about the total number, it's the rate. He is simply less productive.Because Eriksen is playing in a poorer league against very limited opposition most of the time and is a key starter for a team fighting for top four.
Isco is a squad player in one of the biggest clubs in world football competing on all fronts against technically better footballers, I imagine.
Isco has played over 1000 minutes in a Real Madrid side that gives him Ronaldo, Bale, Kroos, Modric and Benzema to pass to. He creates 2/3 of the rate than Eriksen manages per 90 minutes. It's not about the total number, it's the rate. He is simply less productive.
No, the rate of chances created per 90 minutes. It's not a playing time issue.On what basis? Because Eriksen has played more games for us, than Isco has for RM?
I'm not talking about the total number, I'm talking about the rate. Isco creates a significantly lower rate of chances than Eriksen. The total number of minutes doesn't change that.Which is about 1000 minutes less than Eriksen. Against technically better players.
No, the rate of chances created per 90 minutes. It's not a playing time issue.
Which is about 1000 minutes less than Eriksen. Against technically better players.
It's easier to create chances playing for Real Madrid in La Liga than for Spurs in the Premier League in my opinion.
Isco's problem is that he's in and out of the team. He's not had any consistency in his game since he left Malaga.
Zakaria Bakkali, James Rodriguez, and Sergio Canales.Who's created the most chances in La Liga this season?
Sample size. One assist in a 10 minute sub-appearance does that.Apparently, Nolito has created 90 chances for Celta this year, ahead of Messi.
Zakaria Bakkali, James Rodriguez, and Sergio Canales.
And your opinion is yours. I am not impressed with the suggestion that wearing a Real Madrid jersey sprinkles magic fairy dust on a player and makes them better.The stat is pointless. I'm sure Payet was topping these charts over the course of the year, yet he wouldn't get anywhere near our starting eleven.
I personally think, you've probably never ever seen Isco play besides the odd game and this is why you're rating Eriksen higher (fishing for stats and the like), and I have no problem with that
Like I said, your opinion is your opinion
I'll let the Real Madrid fans sort out if they'd rather James or Isco.Right, an Isco is better then every single of them.
Just wanted to point out we've broken the 30m mark on a few ocassions already - pity it hasn't quite worked out. But we certainty have the muscle for large purchasesBased on public amounts, yes he did. Good work by City. Bad work by us. But if Gabriel had failed, City could afford to just buy another. We can't, and have to sell Sissoko first. That is the difference.
He doesn't press relentlessly for 90 mins and is certainty not the most mobile - say like Aguero or prime Robbie Keane. ImActually, Kane is. That is one of his most noteworthy characteristics. He does massive defensive work for a striker.
Isco every single time. James was their Sissoko signing - few good WC games and exposure to the Coloumbian marketI'll let the Real Madrid fans sort out if they'd rather James or Isco.
I'll let the Real Madrid fans sort out if they'd rather James or Isco.
You do know virtually every transfer is broken down by years of contact and recorded as such for accounting and amortisation purposes in the books annually?It's relatively unknown, but this is a more logical suggestion:
Tottenham's Sissoko transfer fee probably not £30m, says agent with alternative theory based on Levy experience