Shots fired by the Athletic there. Very thinly veiled dig at Kane and the way his "team" have handled things.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2021 - Transfer Thread
- Thread starter SchmoodSpur
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
Hopefully, but if they get both for the money flaunted.. the game is done
I think they're reporting what Grealish's team have expressed to City and Villa.
He's been very professional, unlike Kane.
City have also overpaid for Grealish, while they're planning to underpay for Kane.
Never as talented as we thought. Jose was never one to develop young players he just shoves them in the deep end hoping they will swim.
The game was done as soon as Abrahmovic, Mansour and the PSG lot started injecting ridiculous amounts of money into the game. The fact is City and Chelsea have caused wages to go up by at least 3 times what they should be by over paying players.
Dose this stupid ugly balding twat know Fonseca Gatusso ect were turned down by us.... Half witted unfunny maggot micro dick.
who are you talking about?
In 5 years? I'd argue in the next 1-2 years we'd be better off.
You realise he could got to any number of top clubs to get football. His choices are stay at city, go to spurs or go to someone else..
I disagree. They're going all in now. While there seems to be less attention on FFP than ever.
Grealish has Barnett as his agent. This deal was always going to be handled smoothly.
Harry instead has... Well... Charlie.
I'm not saying we should accept £100m, but why can't we replace him with that money? Ings and Vlahović combined would cost less than that, cost less in salaries, and could arguably produce the same as Kane.
Have you ever seen Vlahovic play and Ings (Like Kane) is injury prone and is a year older than Kane, I also think that Southampton play to his strengths, he also has only had one season in the premier league where he has netted more than 12 goals. There is no way any top club should be planning any future around Ings. I have a feeling City will sign Ings as a stop gap until Mbappe and Haaland are available next summer.
Kane offers both goals and creativity. We already needed a 2nd striker because we don’t have one but we would need 2 good strikers and both to have good seasons and possibly upgrades in AM as well to compensate and that is if it all works.
This explains a lot.
I don't think we'll struggle for goals. Which means creativity shouldn't be a problem either. Kane does provide that in bunches, but if we play a different system, that can be compensated for. I know it's just friendlies, but our movement in the attacking third seemed so much better and we created a lot of chances. Add Gio, Tubby, and a more advanced PEH and we may not be that far off.
No. At least 150M. What's with us underseling our own players? We have the best striker in the World, and City are lacking one. If they want to get him, they have to pay up like there's no tomorrow, considering also that they're a team in the same division, and that Kane counts as a homegrown player. If he doesn't want to stay, so be it (which I don't even think that it's true).
I'd rather pull a Chelsea and sign a youth academy player we let go on a free than Damsgaard because we need more help on the right.
Noni has also been playing quite well.
- Status