That's exactly why our attack will be better. Son was playing in a role that's bad for him and was carrying an injury, Kulu lost all confidence after getting dropped, Richarlison was playing out of position. The only functioning part of our attack was Kane. If we keep the ball, play creative players, drop players who are out of form / bad fit, then our attack will be easily superior.Absolutely no chance we score as many goals. 70 goals last season in the league. Kane scored 42% of those.
Son was dogshit for about two thirds of the season. Kulu was dogshit for the whole season. Richarlison got more bookings for celebrating goals than actual goals. Solomon and Veliz is a kid,
For reference
City 94 goals of which 38% scored by Haaland. Haaland who was an upgrade on any of their forwards in prior seasons.
Arse - 88 goals of which 17% were scored by Martinelli.
We are/were heavily reliant on Kane to not only score our goals, but make them too.
Take that out and we, even with a totally different style of play and formation, will score less goals. We're bringing in punts. not guaranteed goals.
If we weren't so astonishingly unreliable a the back I would take that punt for a year. Batten down the hatches, stop shipping goals and hope the new forwards can step up. But as it is, the most touches they'll get is kicking off a few times a game.
Let's talk numbers. Harry scored 30 goals from an xG of around 21, huge overperformance. Richy with his movement should at least match Harry's xG playing at the focal point of our attack, but obviously his finishing isn't as good, so let's say he underperforms and scores 15. Do you think we can't increase our goals scored by more than 15 playing dynamic attacking football with players like Maddison and Lo Celso?