A dud. And a warning to those ''JUST SPEND THE MONEY'' dudes.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Le Big Mac
Agreed.
Its not the worst thing to have a player who tackles, intercepts and presses for 60 minutes and add the few goals and assists more than winksoko who only harm us for 90 minutesHe's an excellent player for 60 minutes, personally hope we can't shift him and start using him for those 60 minutes.
But he covers ground when he's on the field. Okay he might run at a 55° angle , but he's generally above average for distance covered when he's on the field. Obviously if we could go back two years I wouldn't break our transfer record on the guy but while he's here I think he's one of our better midfielders and I'd make use of him if we can't get a deal that benefits us.What's the point in having a midfield with no lungs/legs?
He doesn't affect games anywhere near enough to justify a place at this level when he's simply not fucking professional enough to be fit to play for a whole game.
You don't break a transfer record for a bit part player.
What message does it send to the rest of the squad? Arse around and we'll still keep you? All he has done is fucking moaned and sauntered about the turf, when he's not training with his stupid hat on in all weathers.But he covers ground when he's on the field. Okay he might run at a 55° angle , but he's generally above average for distance covered when he's on the field. Obviously if we could go back two years I wouldn't break our transfer record on the guy but while he's here I think he's one of our better midfielders and I'd make use of him if we can't get a deal that benefits us.
Agree on Ings, but I'd argue knowing what we are getting with Traore isn't necessarily a good thing.We should be buying players who have already cut their teeth in a quality league, this is why I was big on signing Ings, and I'm big on Traore. You know you are getting players who can perform at the required level.
Yeah everything you say is fair, I just think of him making those driving runs and lighting up the Lane, getting the crowd going. We've missed that since Ginola.Agree on Ings, but I'd argue knowing what we are getting with Traore isn't necessarily a good thing.
I'm undecided on him and certainly wouldn't pay the £40m sums being mentioned. Yes, he is a physical beast and destroys ball carrying stats but his end product is truly woeful. For his talent his goals and assists to date speak volumes.
I would replace the 60 mins with about ten at a stretchIts not the worst thing to have a player who tackles, intercepts and presses for 60 minutes and add the few goals and assists more than winksoko who only harm us for 90 minutes
Why dont YOU try running all game after eating 10 burgers!I would replace the 60 mins with about ten at a stretch
Appalling attitude
£55m and 200k a week for a player that plays 2/3 of a game. Great idea.He's an excellent player for 60 minutes, personally hope we can't shift him and start using him for those 60 minutes.
He probably sacrifices the fries
Definitely terrible value for money. Considering how shit we areat retaining the ball in midfield, Id still have him play the second half of matches currently. Unless of course we buy someone good instead of Winksoko who are just trash and hojskip who arent very good at moving the ball forward regularly.£55m and 200k a week for a player that plays 2/3 of a game. Great idea.
Definitely terrible value for money. Considering how shit we areat retaining the ball in midfield, Id still have him play the second half of matches currently. Unless of course we buy someone good instead of Winksoko who are just trash and hojskip who arent very good at moving the ball forward regularly.
Alasdair ? it's you ?Definitely terrible value for money. Considering how shit we areat retaining the ball in midfield, Id still have him play the second half of matches currently. Unless of course we buy someone good instead of Winksoko who are just trash and hojskip who arent very good at moving the ball forward regularly.
I dont get the reference.
umm skojberg?