Really, even when the top four were the same teams for a decade or so?Same top 4 in the same order as the 2018/19 season. First time the same top 4 has ever been repeated in the Premier League!
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Really, even when the top four were the same teams for a decade or so?Same top 4 in the same order as the 2018/19 season. First time the same top 4 has ever been repeated in the Premier League!
I'll take you word for that great stat and well spotted!Same top 4 in the same order as the 2018/19 season. First time the same top 4 has ever been repeated in the Premier League!
Great post!Chelski and Wet Spam laid down to the Arse and got nothing for it except disgrace. With Spam it cost them Europa League.
![]()
Not a single pundit had Spurs in the top 4. I am gobsmacked at the number who had Utd though.
And we had Nuno instead of Conte with Kane's fate only decided after the season had started. It is actually a massive turnaround.Really, why?
Utd finished 2nd and just added Sancho, Ronaldo and Varane to their squad, I think it was the obvious thing at the time that they'd finish in the top 4 because the squad looked so strong.
I think one of the key moments was the 3-0 defeat against Man United. I was hospitalised with a broken ankle at the time and the physio who helped me regain my mobility happened to be a United fan and he had the pleasure of telling me about his team's win, Nuno's sacking and Conte's appointment.
The funny thing is that if we had won that match, United would have probably sacked Solskjaer then and appointed Conte while we would have persisted with Nuno for a bit longer and then found there was no one to replace him with when we realised Nuno was a lost cause.
Maybe by losing that game, we actually won.
Was this at the start of the season? I doubt anyone on here had Nuno Spurs for top 4.![]()
Not a single pundit had Spurs in the top 4. I am gobsmacked at the number who had Utd though.
By Feb I was a believer. It was becoming clear that Rangnick wasn't the answer for Utd. Until then I assumed he'd improve them given the quality they have.Just put few quid on Spurs @ 2/1 for top 4.
Woolwich (current favourites with bookies) - lack of goalscorers and inexperience I think will see them fall short
Man U - unhappy squad, stop gap manager. They still look very disjointed on the pitch.
West Ham - thin squad, will be thereabouts but Europa may take its toll.
Us - best xG difference of any the contenders. Bentancur improves us. Unlike W Ham and Arse, we have a lot of players who've done it before. And we have the best manager in Conte. Injuries are the thing most likely to stop us - we need our key players to stay fit.
COYS!
They really were a loooong way off, they played shit football under OGS, and nothing about them made them look like a top 4 team (they didn't when they finished 2nd under the dinosaur too). To this day don't get why anyone thought Ronaldo was a good signing for them, he wasn't for Juve, why would he be for Utd? Turns out he wasn't. I think Varane is a very good player, but he's not going to make them a good side on his own and Sancho is just a kid (who's hasn't had a single good game when selected to play for England, so the signs were there that he's a long way to go yet before he reaches the same level of hype that surrounded him). OGS was their manager.Really, why?
Utd finished 2nd and just added Sancho, Ronaldo and Varane to their squad, I think it was the obvious thing at the time that they'd finish in the top 4 because the squad looked so strong.