• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers The Summer Transfer Edging Thread 2025

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Is it just me, or are Newcastle being majorly cock blocked?
First Liverpool tap up Isaak. Then when Newcastle refuse to sell they sign Ekitike. Now Newcastle are trying to sign James Trafford but City have stepped in.

It feels like teams are trying to sabotage them.

And im here for it.
Trillions of pounds and no way to spend it :roflmao:
Love what’s happening to them, they’ve had an abysmal summer so far
 
it's a weird one, i didn't know a club could just refuse if a release clause is met. pretty wild as per rules...

  • Selling Club's Option:
    While the release clause is met, the selling club is not automatically obligated to let the player leave. They can refuse to release the player if they believe the clause is invalid or if they believe the player is too valuable to let go.

  • Dispute Resolution:
    In the event of a dispute, FIFA regulations or the rules of the relevant league (like the Premier League) would likely come into play. This could involve arbitration, where an independent body would assess the situation and make a decision.

  • Potential Outcomes:
    The arbitration could result in the buying club being allowed to speak to the player, or it could rule in favor of the selling club, potentially forcing the buying club to negotiate a higher fee or abandon the transfer.

    should imagine forest will simply keep him, and if we take issue then we can take it further legally by which it will probably be past the transfer window anyway
This is why the FA would be extremely worried about a case like this going to court I’d imagine. Their rules would seem to contradict employment contract law. If a player in MGW’s position took the club and the FA to court I reckon he would win and the FA would be seen as in breach of contract law.
No way would the FA want such a situation to occur. Of course as you said by the time it got sorted the window would be closed and 5hen the player may even challenge that.

As for the MGW case I have a new theory, and it’s mine, and it belongs to me ahem ahem ahem. My theory on MGW, which is mine, ahem ahem…. The theory on MGW and Marinakis’ refusal to release the player, which is my theory ahem ahem…..

Marinakis is pissed that we sacked a fellow fatty Greek in Ange and he is standing in solidarity for the fatty Greek footballing fraternity. There, that’s it ahem ahem, my theory which belongs to me….
I have another theory. …..
 
Last edited:
Players like those two would be in the stands most weeks at the serious clubs and only get the odd appearance in a cup match, that either of them could feasibly be our starting LW is extremely alarming. There's nothing wrong with signing young talent but players of that profile shouldn't be relied upon as core players at this stage of their careers, especially as they have done nothing exceptional to this point.

Well we're not a serious club so you know the answer
 
Same here...why anyone would want another overpaid cunt to come in and down tools on a whim is beyond me.

We've had our fair share of this ilk over the years and I for one am glad he appears to have a smattering of decency about him.
Decency has nothing to do with it (if he and his camp have done nothing wrong).

If everything was above board and Spurs have come in and met the release clause MGW has every right to kick up a fuss.

Not even the most brain dead of Forest fans could have anything to complain about.

In this case the silence is deafening.
 
He was our best player during our worst run of form of the season when most other senior players in the team were absolutely fatigued. I just think that period overrated him. It wasn't easy to be the best of a bad bunch.

From MArch onwards when we'd most our players back, Spence never stood out and put in some shocking performances.

I hope I'm being harsh on him and he can push Porro and Udogie next season but I've a feeling he's nowhere near their level and the fall back will be huge when he comes in.

He obviously stood out including keeping Salah quiet in the League Cup win 1st leg.

Saying he was the best of a bad bunch is harsh, there were calls for him to get an England call up at the time and he was actually playing well.

I expect him to push on this season.
 
Newcastle owners are worth $600bn+

They can ask for whatever they want for Isaak and have zero need to accept less. They can afford to replace him without selling him and, if he doesn't act professionally, they can literally disregard him.

Might even make him disappear, who knows.
 
It's not what anyone wants to hear, but the club has made biggish investments in both Tel and Odobert.

I'm not saying it's a good excuse but they'll at least want to see if they can get something out of the investment.

I still think the Tel signing carries a question mark in terms of where (if not why)....... Something that depends of Frank's vision for him and the line-up (Ditto what Kulu's future looks like).

If we're to play 4231; I'd prefer to see him take Richy's role in the squad as back-up ST and emergency LW and use the proceeds of Rich & Son's sales to help fund a first XI ready LW. Leaving us with something like:

RW: Kudus (Johnson / Kulu)
ST: Solanke (Tel / Lankshire /Scarlett)
LW: [ New ] (Odobert / Moore)

All that said; my first choice would be 352; in which case a front 2 of:

Kudus (Johnson / Lankshire) / Solanke (Tel / Scarlett)

......With Odo, Kulu, Moore fighting it out for AM duties.
 
Back
Top