He’s a striker, he’s there to score goals. If he’s not clinical he’s not good enough.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
He’s a striker, he’s there to score goals. If he’s not clinical he’s not good enough.
Lamela was so hopelessly one footed he was never gonna be a big deal.He reminds me of Lamela.
Extremely left footed, dribbling style is also similar. Likes a slide tackle too.
He reminds me of Lamela.
Extremely left footed, dribbling style is also similar. Likes a slide tackle too.
Tottenham seem to have a habit of holding onto players longer than necessary, often to our detriment. Take Bryan Gil, for example—he’s been with us for four years, and it’s been clear for some time that he struggles to adapt to the Premier League. After his first season, we might have been better off cashing in.They'll get it.
Meanwhile, we sign players like Ndombele, Sessegnon, GLC, Richarlison, Gil etc and end up having to give them away .
Why?
I swear Chelsea are just sending money out the back door somehow to clubs to buy them.
I hope you poked him in the eye!I met a United fan tonight. He asked me who I support and when I told him he laughed. Shouldn't it be the other way around?!

Bit of an issue considering the position he plays!Nicolas Jackson ain't happening but I do think he's a really good player. With fundamentally flawed striking technique. He shoots like me when I'm tired at training.

Your Missing the most important factor - will they take £100K a week or Less............. I think if we actually broke our wage structure we would have had some more players in, its just players know they can go to other clubs and get a 50% + bump in wages
Needless to say, I was pilloried on here for suggesting we don't make Lo Celso permanent.Tottenham seem to have a habit of holding onto players longer than necessary, often to our detriment. Take Bryan Gil, for example—he’s been with us for four years, and it’s been clear for some time that he struggles to adapt to the Premier League. After his first season, we might have been better off cashing in.
The same could be said for Bissouma and Richarlison. While both showed promise, their performances haven’t justified the investment, and perhaps we missed the window to recoup value. Ndombele is another case where we held on too long, hoping for a turnaround that never came.
Lo Celso’s situation is particularly frustrating. We signed him early to save money, but had we waited a few weeks, we might have seen signs of recurring injury issues. These decisions suggest a pattern of short-term thinking and reluctance to cut losses.
I’m not saying every transfer will be perfect, but we need to be more decisive and realistic about when a player isn’t working out. Sentimentality and sunk cost shouldn’t drive our strategy.
A real ambitious owner would get…
1. Rodrygo to replace Son
2. Get Paz, Eze or Akliouche for number 10
3. Get Ederson for 6/8
4. Get Robinson for LB
5. Get Hincapie or Guehi for LCB
Bare minimum I’d take 1, 2 and 5.
Absolutely. And let's be real, that window isn't making us a challenger to liverpool this season but it at least shows some kind of intent to catch up.
A week until Burnley and our squad depth is worse than last season
I agree on this. Just didn't see this in the post I quoted.The pattern is this:
MGW - opportunistic because his release clause was lower than Forest's value of the player (they would never accept 60m without release clause)
Palhinha - opportunistic because Bayern wanted rid
Kudus - opportunistic because WHU had to sell
We don't target the best players for Frank, we target players with value
I think the same as Tel, we made it permanent because we paid such a high loan fee and dont want to write it off despite all the evidence. We're like a gambling addict chasing their money.Needless to say, I was pilloried on here for suggesting we don't make Lo Celso permanent.
I could see a mile away he wasn't up to it.
Siri, not counting Matt Cash, which signing would wind up Spurs fans the most?Nicolas Jackson ain't happening but I do think he's a really good player. With fundamentally flawed striking technique. He shoots like me when I'm tired at training.
Just goes to show how "perception" isn't especially important eh?
We still need to do more of course, but Kudus & JP need to bomb pretty hard to match up to the duds of 2019.
Mind, we should be able to concentrate on the league and staying up by March/April latest....we'll almost certainly be out of every cup by then....Where does the club finish the year as currently constituted, and knowing the number of fixtures we face?
Relegation a real threat this time…?
True, but to use an educational analogy, whilst the #1 importance to a student is the grade they achieve in an exam, they know that the more revision they do in preparation for that exam, the better their chances of achieving a higher grade. Given our league performance over the last season and a half, it feels like we should have had a clear 'revision' plan mapped out long ago... instead, it looks like we're trying to do a bit of last minute cramming.
Two fundamental problemsTottenham seem to have a habit of holding onto players longer than necessary, often to our detriment. Take Bryan Gil, for example—he’s been with us for four years, and it’s been clear for some time that he struggles to adapt to the Premier League. After his first season, we might have been better off cashing in.
The same could be said for Bissouma and Richarlison. While both showed promise, their performances haven’t justified the investment, and perhaps we missed the window to recoup value. Ndombele is another case where we held on too long, hoping for a turnaround that never came.
Lo Celso’s situation is particularly frustrating. We signed him early to save money, but had we waited a few weeks, we might have seen signs of recurring injury issues. These decisions suggest a pattern of short-term thinking and reluctance to cut losses.
I’m not saying every transfer will be perfect, but we need to be more decisive and realistic about when a player isn’t working out. Sentimentality and sunk cost shouldn’t drive our strategy.