They’re all tight to me son!!!
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Supporters The Trust have called for the board to resign.
- Thread starter SpiderSpurs
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
We need 'laughing at'/'laughing with' emoji options.
What would you moan about if Levy left?
You still avoid answering the fact you got caught out again! Its all too easy to catch you out. Then you always deflect.
I thought you couldn't be bothered to interact with me?
So you do recognise the yourself in my post. Must be some truth in it then.
Rattled much.
Strange how even those who voted "out" but have the balls to say that Levy has done some things well are also labelled "Levy lovers"
But it's not a cult, nope, no way.
Enjoy the protest tomorrow.
Unless you're just another keyboard warrior who doesn't back up their words with action.
How is that rattled pointing out your mistakes.
& now you post a typical standard keyboard warrior post in the same post you call me a keyboard warrior! You have really lost it!
You just keep calling out people for stiff you do. weird!
Yeah, I can't be bothered to interact with you & your begging for us to praise levy for sacking his awful appointment.
Your love for enic & levy before THFC is nauseating. On ignore you go!
Called your bluff.
No need to reply. Just keep spending your time defending enic & levy till your dying day.
No more reading stevee's enic & levy loving post's. I feel better already.
ochlol:
Not at all. Stevee loves levy more than tottenham. Would rather lose kane than enic & levy. Not my type of person at all, so best to put him on ignore. Im wanting on the pitch success not accounting success. Leave stevee & the others to talk about how proud they are of the net spend.As I get on ok with both of you I think a bit of being a WUM is going on so let’s calm down!
Levy and is a cunt
We can all agree on that !
Just can't get a buzz from that kind of stuff like them. I was loving watching bale back scoring a hat trick.
Whilst they were worrying if he gets a goal bonus or not. Each to their own I guess.
Oh I notice you on a yellow. Who's going to vote you to give you the red card hmmm
And yet, here you are again interacting with me.
As you don't get it, I'll break it down into the simplest terms so even you can understand it.
1) I put up a post about you, without naming you, as bait.
2) You took the bait as expected and replied.
3) In my reply to you I didn't deny it was about you. Nor did I confirm that it was about you.
4) You then not only took the bait, but fell for it hook, line, sinker and took half the boat with you.
5) I wasn't caught out in anything, ( see point 3) it was a very obvious ploy which you fell for.
6)Not only did you fall for it, but you were so rattled that you not only quoted both my posts but also took the time and trouble and effort to type both of them out, by hand, in full.
7) On ignore (in bold no less) oh dear, how will I sleep tonight.
Devastated.
Last edited:
A bit patronising and some personal poison there.
But don't worry, your leader will be along to give you a like.
Maybe it's because you're only an acolyte, rather than a leader, that has you so bitter.
Ok
I was just trying to keep the peace mate
Exactly, I'm surprised he doesn't see the irony
Yes, One of the weakest, embarrising things I've ever seen posted
I'm sure it's not actually the case. But I must admit it does sometimes come accross like.
That's an interesting one. Great question.
stevee
, Kane or ENIC?
Last edited:
Who do you think gets a buzz out of our net spend?
Who on this forum doesn’t want on pitch success?
Name names please.
Good on ya. Sometimes its for the best if 2 people just stay out of each others way.
Yep if kane leaves for success then thats on enic & levy. So if you back & support them knowing it means we lose kane.Exactly, I'm surprised he doesn't see the irony
Yes, One of the weakest, embarrising things I've ever seen posted
I'm sure it's not actually the case. But I must admit it does sometimes come accross like.
That's an interesting one. Great question.
You are picking them over kane.
Seems unimaginable for most clubs. But we do things differently.
Decided to do my 1st thread & poll.
Be interesting to see who wants kane & who wants enic & levy.
Dying to know who you pick. It truly is a toss of a coin!
Last edited:
Most enic supporters would rather not have on the pitch success if it means losing enic & levy. In fact quite a few have said they would stop supporting the club if we had owners they didn't approve of.
I am just going off their posts.
Ask stevee & other enic supporters. 2 choices.
would you want on the pitch success with city type owners or
no on the field success with enic?
I think quite a few would choose no on pitch success. Hope I am wrong but they have said as much.
Ps. Actually you avoided my last question to you. You said not gonna bite.
So really I should have done the same as you!
I don’t have to ask Stevee as I keep a keen eye on his posts - he talks a lot of sense.
And I’m probably up there with him on the “ENIC lover scale”, but like him, I don’t “get a buzz” from our net spend figures. And like him, I’d love us to be successful on the pitch.
My best outcome is to be successful on the pitch under ENIC and Levy. Secondly, if the first wasn’t possible, successful on the pitch under the ownership of a baby killing regime.
I think some fans might not want someone like the Saudis in charge of the club so may question their support. That’s up to them and their politics. But it’s nothing to do with net spend etc.
So would still be interested to hear about these supporters that would get a buzz from our accounts but not on field success.
Can’t recall what your last question was. Can you repost so I don’t have to search?
:mourfacepalm:Exactly, I'm surprised he doesn't see the irony
Yes, One of the weakest, embarrising things I've ever seen posted
I'm sure it's not actually the case. But I must admit it does sometimes come accross like.
That's an interesting one. Great question.
Another facile and facetious post by him.
But I'll answer your question :
I would rather keep Kane 100 % all day long.
Now how about you answer my questions, that you have avoided.
1) Do you blame Enic/Levy entirely for our lack of trophies.
2) Have you found those qoutes yet from Levy re no interest in football and being a life long fan.
3) Or did you tell a bald faced lie about said qoutes and therefore have called your integrity into question?
Last edited:
It's interesting to see who would sell their sole for a trophy.
Great news guys, we have child murdering rapists as our new owners, but it's all good cos we'll win something
Basically you saying how inflammatory the term levy lovers is. Seems very dramatic to me. & also if you truly aren't assed about levy, why would you care enough to get inflammed & angry over someone calling you a levy lover. Seems very touche & the actions of somebody already on the edge if its that easy to inflame them. Call me a levy lover, I don't mind.
As for the net spend & accounting buzz. I think its cause you have lumped everyone in with the not wanting wealthy owners who invest for political reasons.
When in fact there is another type of fan who thinks it is a hollow victory spending big & basically buying success.
Nothing to do with the morals of the owners. They don't want us to win stuff if it involves big sending. Or buying success as they call it. Suprised you missed all these posts too. Funny that.
So they wouldn't get a buzz from us lifting a CL final due to it being holllow because of the net spend & accounts side of things.
Now throw in that side of things & they get a buzz & a high from that.
As for stevee taking sense. Have to question your judgement on that. Levy appoints a manager who does a bad job in his eyes & has been a bad appointment. Stevee thinks its a plus point that levy fired him & he deserves praise for it.
Fair enough if you agree with that but I ain't bored with that warped way of thinking. A chairman makes an appointment of his own making, that then fails so sacks him. It is logically a con, not a pro for that chairman. Not in the levy lovers world. Great work dan!
& last of all you seem to think you're very good at observations & at taking in all these endless points. Remember the everyone just wants the best for poch & wish him well. Despite the 1000s of posts saying otherwise. I think I am going to retire from pointing out stuff you haven't spotted on the forum. As there's a lot, especially if it goes against your agenda.
Also, not my job to point out stuff you turn a blind eye too or genuinely some how don't spot.
Not asking you to point out stuff I’ve missed. Just asked you to post the question you asked me to save me searching for it. Turns out I’d not have found it because there wasn’t a question.
Speaking of not spotting things. I’ve not lumped everyone in with me as not wanting wealthy owners who invest for political reasons. I’ve stated clearly on here that this would be my second choice of owner after ENIC. To be clear - if we are to be sold, sell to the richest cunt we can find. Only shades of grey here as all billionaires are cunts in one way or another.
If someone doesn’t want owners due to political issues, or don’t want us to spend fortunes for success, I don’t think either equates them getting a buzz from net spend.
As for Levy / Jose, the only mistake Levy made was sacking him too soon. Just my opinion though. Doubt it’s anyone else’s.
Levy lovers inflammatory? Thats the question. You think thats an inflammatory term right? Or are you going back on that.
Nope I meant it seemed you lumped in the political ones with the hollow victory. As you left out the hollow victory guys.
I didn't mean you feel that way. As yes, you have made it clear you don't mind morally bad owners. Fair play.
Yes, not many people agree with you on keeping jose longer. Bold opinion!
I am asking your opinion on steeve over the,
Levy appoints a manager who does a bad job in his eyes & has been a bad appointment. Stevee thinks its a plus point that levy fired him & he deserves praise for it.
Do you think that's a fair argument & makes sense?
Do you not think that the appointment went wrong & he ended up sacked means levy deserves no praise. If anything, criticism.