• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Supporters The Trust have called for the board to resign.

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

:mourfacepalm:

Another facile and facetious post by him.

But I'll answer your question :
I would rather keep Kane 100 % all day long.

Now how about you answer my questions, that you have avoided.

1) Do you blame Enic/Levy entirely for our lack of trophies.

2) Have you found those qoutes yet from Levy re no interest in football and being a life long fan.

3) Or did you tell a bald faced lie about said qoutes and therefore have called your integrity into question?
1) Yes. Who do you blame? (No fence sitting with your answer, please)

2) Yes. I posted them yesterday for the umpteenth time. Why do you dismiss them?

3) You brought up the question of Levy and "bald faced lies" yourself

Why?

And to repeat my own question you squirmed away from like a snake yesterday......Name the posters who said Levy was responsible for every single SF and Final defeat?

And please don't repeat this nonsense of people blaming our lack of trophies on ENIC as the same as claiming every single performance in these matches is Levy's fault.

Like I said. Names please.

I like your response to the Kane question Scott posed though. I like it very much.

It'll be so interesting to see your reaction if he's flogged in the Summer. But hey, it seems we're both in agreement that we hope it doesn't come to that

:avbpray:
 
Last edited:
We're all happy to see the back of him, but you still have to reckon with the question, did the timing of Mourinho's sacking demonstrate that Daniel Levy considered the cup final to be an important, meaningful moment for the club?

One key to winning trophies is trying to win trophies.
 
Levy lovers inflammatory? Thats the question. You think thats an inflammatory term right? Or are you going back on that.

Nope I meant it seemed you lumped in the political ones with the hollow victory. As you left out the hollow victory guys.
I didn't mean you feel that way. As yes, you have made it clear you don't mind morally bad owners. Fair play.

Yes, not many people agree with you on keeping jose longer. Bold opinion!

I am asking your opinion on steeve over the,
Levy appoints a manager who does a bad job in his eyes & has been a bad appointment. Stevee thinks its a plus point that levy fired him & he deserves praise for it.
Do you think that's a fair argument & makes sense?
Do you not think that the appointment went wrong & he ended up sacked means levy deserves no praise. If anything, criticism.
Yes, I think it’s inflammatory as you know it gets a reaction. It’s not as outright as calling someone a cunt (my personal favourite), but it does elicit a response.

I’m not going to speak directly for Stevee, but I’d imagine that he sees the Jose appointment as a negative for Levy, but feels he merits praise for acting to sack him. I feel the opposite. I’m praising Levy for hiring him and slagging Levy for sacking him.

If you feel Jose was the wrong appointment, you should deride Levy for that. But then you have to say it’s a positive step that he sacked him. You can’t have it both ways.
 
It's interesting to see who would sell their sole for a trophy.
Great news guys, we have child murdering rapists as our new owners, but it's all good cos we'll win something

Good grief! A new low.

200.gif
 
Last edited:
We're all happy to see the back of him, but you still have to reckon with the question, did the timing of Mourinho's sacking demonstrate that Daniel Levy considered the cup final to be an important, meaningful moment for the club?

One key to winning trophies is trying to win trophies.
You can't have "The Game Is About Glory" banners wrapped around the pitch and then construct the club's mission around finishing in fourth. Does not compute.
 
Yes, I think it’s inflammatory as you know it gets a reaction. It’s not as outright as calling someone a cunt (my personal favourite), but it does elicit a response.

I’m not going to speak directly for Stevee, but I’d imagine that he sees the Jose appointment as a negative for Levy, but feels he merits praise for acting to sack him. I feel the opposite. I’m praising Levy for hiring him and slagging Levy for sacking him.

If you feel Jose was the wrong appointment, you should deride Levy for that. But then you have to say it’s a positive step that he sacked him. You can’t have it both ways.
I think thats a bit over sensitive to be made angry by being called levy lover. But fair enough.

Well we have to disagree on the levy stuff. By that logic he can keep making bad appointments & then give him praise when he sacks them. To me that just highlights a levy lover. As long as he sacks his mistakes then well done dan. Seems you want it both ways. He can choose crap managers so gets criticised but then lots of praise when he sacks them. When really its a bad costly mistake. Not something worthy of praise for.
But no point going around in circles on it. That's why I see you & stevee as levy lovers. & you see me as a hater. As somehow, even a terrible mistake like jose = more praise for levy.

Also, if an agent explains why one of his players didn't join a club. Is that his opinion or a solid fact? Be interested in what you think?
 
1) Yes. Who do you blame? (No fence sitting with your answer, please)

2) Yes. I posted them yesterday for the umpteenth time. Why do you dismiss them?

3) You brought up the question of Levy and "bald faced lies" yourself

Why?

And to repeat my own question you squirmed away from like a snake yesterday......Name the posters who said Levy was responsible for every single SF and Final defeat?

And please don't repeat this nonsense of people blaming our lack of trophies on ENIC as the same as claiming every single performance in these matches is Levy's fault.

Like I said. Names please.

I like your response to the Kane question Scott posed though. I like it very much.

It'll be so interesting to see your reaction if he's flogged in the Summer. But hey, it seems we're both in agreement that we hope it doesn't come to that

:avbpray:
They always say if this happens I will be very cross with ENIC/levy. It then happens. They double down on their love & support of them.
If we flogged kane they will still defend & support them. None will pick kane over ENIC/levy. Just as I predicted.
 
We're all happy to see the back of him, but you still have to reckon with the question, did the timing of Mourinho's sacking demonstrate that Daniel Levy considered the cup final to be an important, meaningful moment for the club?

One key to winning trophies is trying to win trophies.
Very odd to sack him 1 game before a final. I think its more proof levy don't care about trophies. I thought the cup final was the whole reason we persisted with jose.
 
I think thats a bit over sensitive to be made angry by being called levy lover. But fair enough.

Well we have to disagree on the levy stuff. By that logic he can keep making bad appointments & then give him praise when he sacks them. To me that just highlights a levy lover. As long as he sacks his mistakes then well done dan. Seems you want it both ways. He can choose crap managers so gets criticised but then lots of praise when he sacks them. When really its a bad costly mistake. Not something worthy of praise for.
But no point going around in circles on it. That's why I see you & stevee as levy lovers. & you see me as a hater. As somehow, even a terrible mistake like jose = more praise for levy.

Also, if an agent explains why one of his players didn't join a club. Is that his opinion or a solid fact? Be interested in what you think?
Nobody said anything about being angry. But don’t let that stop you doing your usual and exaggerating to make a point. Just calls your integrity into question every time you do it.

And again, I don’t want anything both ways. Now not sure if you don’t understand, or are again, just making stuff up. I’ll be even more clear:

We hired Jose - GOOD Levy.

We sacked Jose - BAD Levy.

Whereas what Stevee seems to be saying is:

We hired Jose - BAD Levy.

We sacked Jose - GOOD Levy.

As for the agent thing? Fuck knows. Is he an honest agent? Is there such a thing? Is he telling the truth or spinning a yarn to get his player a good deal somewhere else? I’m sure you aren’t interested in what I think, but are digging around for some wee victory. But I’ve no idea if this hypothetical agent is a liar or not.
 
Nobody said anything about being angry. But don’t let that stop you doing your usual and exaggerating to make a point. Just calls your integrity into question every time you do it.

And again, I don’t want anything both ways. Now not sure if you don’t understand, or are again, just making stuff up. I’ll be even more clear:

We hired Jose - GOOD Levy.

We sacked Jose - BAD Levy.

Whereas what Stevee seems to be saying is:

We hired Jose - BAD Levy.

We sacked Jose - GOOD Levy.

As for the agent thing? Fuck knows. Is he an honest agent? Is there such a thing? Is he telling the truth or spinning a yarn to get his player a good deal somewhere else? I’m sure you aren’t interested in what I think, but are digging around for some wee victory. But I’ve no idea if this hypothetical agent is a liar or not.

What do you reckon? Agents quotes are facts or his opinion.
 

Hilarious. These guys have fucked up so much. They could have pulled it off by drip-feeding the details and having consultations. Even the closed shop aspect probably could have been shoved through in some guise. Get the fans thinking they deserve to be above everyone else forever (that aspect was even espoused on here bizarrely). We all saw how quickly the cowardly "rather be in it" brigade rose up. I was becoming genuinely worried that would be the prevailing view, but it didn't have time to fester fortunately.

Instead, they just randomly announced that they have started a tournament behind everyone's back. Additionally, they actively lied to everyone about it. I still think there is some fraud in there. For example, if they at any point lied to shareholders/members/investors that is a big deal.
 
Back
Top