Regarding that old dilemma about is it that the players are shit or is it that the manager is shit. Who is the bigger contributor to our current predicament.
For me it has to be down to Frank. And the reason is, the other managers with inferior squads are doing a far better job. I am not talking about results, because results don't always tell the truth. You don't always get what you deserve.
SO I look at is the manager getting the best out of the players. How is he coaching them. Style of play. Attacking patterns. Chance creation. Organising the defence.
All of these, Frank is failing miserably.
There is no doubt we have some really overated players. Porro, Vicario, Udogie, Bentacur, Johnson, Odobert, Richarlison, Spence.. They simply aren't as good as many fans think they are. On top of that we have a bunch of young players, who have proven very little and can't be relied upon in the PL.
Our recruitment has also been shocking.
There is no doubt that Lange needs to be sacked. He's totally clueless.
But the question is, will another manager get more out of this squad,including the players who are overrated. And it's a definite yes.
Just because Ange was a clown fraud, it doesn't mean his replacement is good by default.
The truth is we fucked up with the Frank appointment. I'd rather roll the dice, keep rolling it until we find a manager who shows he is good enough. We can't risk keeping Frank and getting relegated.
I take issue with how casually people assume that most squads are inferior than ours. I think this is mostly fan bias.
Yes we have Romero and VDV who generally perform to a very high level but outside of that what do we really have?
Is Danso any better than Tarkowski?
Is Bergvall better than Kiernan Dewsbury Hall?
Could Odobert do what Harry Wilson did?
Richarlison is no better than Jimenez
We then have the likes of Muani and Xavi who come in with a reputation because they have performed well in pub leagues but we see this doesn't always translate.
When you actually go man for man across a squad I reckon we have clearly better players than maybe 4 -5 teams MAXIMUM (Leeds, Burnley, West Ham, Wolves) and we have 10 points from 12 against that lot.
Forest, Fulham, Sunderland, Everton I'd say we are about par with now noting that some of these teams have much better specific areas (i.e. Forest midfield, Everton attack).
Palace, United, Newcastle, Bournemouth, maybe Brentford have better 11's.
And then obviously we are miles away from the rest.
Media narrative plays a big part and players naturally are assumed to be of a higher level when they play for a club like Spurs. If we are real about it, the vast majority of our squad would not look out of place at Everton or Forest. Odobert is still a Burnley level player for example.