its all relative though isn't it - you are not looking for £60,000 a week more, you are looking for parity to others who are at your level. The vast majority of players would be happy with £800 p/w if that's all that was in the game and everyone else is getting similar.
In every other walk of life market forces rule, he has no real ties to the club so the same applies here.
He was happy enough to sign for us in the first place & he was a top defender then.
He still has 2 years left on that deal.
Now, I’m all for rewarding performance, and we have repeatedly improved contracts for players who have performed.
All the suggestions are that he will sign for us, but wants to treble his wages.
My point is...if we are offering him £110k a week then he is missing out on a very healthy pay rise.
He could earn that now for the next 3-4 years.
Or he can stay on his £50,000 a week & try his luck for his big payday when he has run his contract down. He still has to play well to keep himself in the shop window. By which time, Sanchez & Foyth will be well established. It’s not as though we are not going to use Toby exclusively for those 2 years he has left on his contract.
Assuming my maths is correct here;
If he signed for 3 years at £110,000 he makes £17 million.
If he stays for 2 years on £50,000 he makes £5.2 million
He has to bag himself a mega deal to make back “lost earnings” over the next 2 years by not signing a new deal.
If we have to take £25 million for his release clause in 15 months time, then we have to do that. But he is still needing a huge deal on the table to make it worth his while?
I’m sure his agent has pointed this out to him though
