The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
This is telling.
Were we over-appreciating Dembele? Was it just the fact that Bentaleb, Mason, Carroll weren't suitable replacements but now the likes of Wanyama, Alli and Dier all CAN be?
Very much the latter.
The 4-2-3-1 we played last year needed Dembele to do his magic for things to work.
We've switched to a 4-1-4-1 in the last month with Wanyama at the base with Eriksen as a playmaker and Dele as a midield runner, and that 3 man combination seems to be working.
I don't know if Dier can swap for Wanyama in this situation, or Wanyama is just as unique as Dembele, but the new system works, and I'll take that without complaint.
Sissoko wasn't our first choice though, for that role, we allegedly bid for Zaha before that, and possibly others. So the idea of faster wide players definitely had been on the cards for a while. (Though I still think we could have found better for a hell of a lot cheaper with just a little bit of smarter scouting)The 4141 only really seems to work if the wide players are prepared to take on the fullbacks - no inverse wingers.
I'm sure there's probably a design behind our tactics....but occasionally it feels like we fall into them e.g. Alli coming through so quickly last season to replace Chadli and the literally last minute signing of Sissoko allowing us to play the current formation.
This is telling.
Were we over-appreciating Dembele? Was it just the fact that Bentaleb, Mason, Carroll weren't suitable replacements but now the likes of Wanyama, Alli and Dier all CAN be?
And like an utter nitwit, I forgot to include the link:In case anyone missed it, here was Statsbomb's take on things through the international break. Great material for pointing and laughing at West Ham.
We are matching the same results as last season so if we want to finish higher we need to beat the teams who took points off us.Tottenham Hotspur have taken 18 points from their opening 8 x Premier League games calculating an average 2 x points per game.
So basically like winning EVERY home game and drawing EVERY away game. We'll end up on 76 points this season, which is usually JUST about good enough for fourth or fifth place.
Would also be our record points total wouldn't it?
Tottenham Hotspur have taken 18 points from their opening 8 x Premier League games calculating an average 2 x points per game.
So basically like winning EVERY home game and drawing EVERY away game. We'll end up on 76 points this season, which is usually JUST about good enough for fourth or fifth place.
Would also be our record points total wouldn't it?
All we need is 69 points and we are guaranteed 4th. It's scienceTottenham Hotspur have taken 18 points from their opening 8 x Premier League games calculating an average 2 x points per game.
So basically like winning EVERY home game and drawing EVERY away game. We'll end up on 76 points this season, which is usually JUST about good enough for fourth or fifth place.
Would also be our record points total wouldn't it?
All we need is 69 points and we are guaranteed 4th. It's science
lol I made a joke, about your thread! I was wrong though, it's 68, not 69.Erm, AVB might disagree. We finished with 72 points in 2012-13 and finished 5th. But, yes a finish with 69 or more points generally leads to Champions League qualification.
You're thicker than pig-shitTottenham Hotspur have taken 18 points from their opening 8 x Premier League games calculating an average 2 x points per game.
So basically like winning EVERY home game and drawing EVERY away game. We'll end up on 76 points this season, which is usually JUST about good enough for fourth or fifth place.
Would also be our record points total wouldn't it?
We're gonna win the league