Tottenham the most dangerous attack under mourinho in first 5 games!

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Sort by date Sort by reaction score
White Van Jan said:
Our strength is in our attack, he's playing to our strength
Click to expand...

Team talk for each match.
Get ball. Score goals.

Not;
Pass ball 256 times in own half.
When you pass it forward, make sure it's slow enough to let teams get back behind the ball.
Make sure you fanny around with it in your own box to increase your chances of fucking it up.
 

Residentevilbeater

I just realised since mourinho became our manager we have become the most dangerous attacking PL team, scoring most goals over the last 5 games under him.

1. Spurs 16 goals in 5 games.
2. Liverpool 13 goals in 5 games.
3. Leicester 12 goals in 5 games.
4. Man City 10 goals in 5 games.
5. Man United 10 goals in 5 games.
6. Wolverhampton 10 goals in 5 games.
7. Chelsea 6 goals in 5 games.



:mourear: :moursmall: :mourthumb: :mourloopy:
 
Last edited:
It's because we have a seriously potent attack... Kane, Moura, Son, Alli... Jose is using them in the right way... When we counter, they bomb forward and run clever lines designed to rip holes in defences. Lovely to watch.
 
Attack! Attack! Attack Attack Attack!

emily-atack-at-film-premiere-2018-1544970617.jpg
 
I'm holding my breath. We were pathetic against Man U.

We look much improved under Jose, but still very far from our best. Running the score up on Burnley only counts so much, as wonderful as it was to see.
 
Sir Archibald Crooks said:
Other than that first 5 or 6 games it was really grim bar the 2nd half at Southampton and Utd away a year ago. Nuno was the wrong appointment but it doesnt make sacking Mourinho the wro g decision, in fact he should have gone a lot earlier than he did.
Click to expand...
Sacking Mourinho before the cup final was a criminally bad decision - and then appointing a clueless buffoon to give his Instagram mates a run. All to save a few bob - the tight bald cunt
 
Sir Archibald Crooks said:
How did he change it? He finished 6th and then got sacked when we were in 7th, our 2 worst league placings in 10 years.
Click to expand...

Skooch said:
He left it even worse and totally disjointed.
Click to expand...

We were 14th when Poch left. Based on the results and diminishing performances that season, there was nothing at all to make me believe we would have improved on that if he stayed for the season.
Not least because he was no longer motivated and the snidey cunt players were doing the dirty on him.

We ultimately finished 7 points off the top 4 and 16 points off 14th - so we improved where our projected finish would have been. Last season we ultimately finished 5 points off the top 4.
In his almost 2 full seasons, despite a shit squad and little backing, we finished 7 and 5 points off the top 4. What undid us, in both seasons, was horrendous bottle jobs in 6 pointer games we could and probably should have won.
The football was often horrible, no one will deny it. But you always felt that there were 2 or 3 games per season where the entire game was a write off and you knew it in the first few minutes. Chelsea, United, Woolwich and even some games against lesser clubs where we just failed to arrive in time for kick off.
Those players did it for Poch, Mourinho and now Nono.

Could anyone here put their hand on their heart and say they believe Nono will get anywhere near that close to a top 4 finish? No chance. He/we will be nowhere near it. It'll be 10-20 points off by May.
 
Airfixx said:
Ridiculous bias... There were under par performances all over the pitch.

Did Winks give away a silly pen or cause Gaz to concede at his near post...?

...Or allow Rashford to cruise down our right wing over and over?

Nope.
Click to expand...
Did we get better as soon as Winks went off? Yes. Pundits even said the same after the match.
Were me considerably better against Burnley without Winks? Yes.
Were we much, much better away to Red Star without Winks? Yes.
Were we much, much better at home to Red Star without Winks? Yes.
Shall I keep finding games we won comfortably when he wasn't involved?

He offers nothing. He receives the ball and then immediately passes it straight back to the player who gave it to it him. Absolute nothingness.
 
Matt1882 said:
Just stumbled across this thread.

Early stages of Mourinho when we were scoring for fun. And we sacked him because he was too negative.
And also, LOL at people who still thought Winks was a footballer by the time Mourinho came. Some of us figured out he was a fraud well, well before then.
Click to expand...
He got a very short term bounce. From Chelsea at home pre xmas 2019 we were shite. We had a brief spell start of the next season and then turned to shite again. It was an utterly miserable 18 months.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom