I've held on to this but;
I'm starting to think we've over payed for Archie Gray.
Am I on my own with this lingering doubt?
I'm starting to think we've over payed for Archie Gray.
Am I on my own with this lingering doubt?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Of COURSE it is!!!First time since 1972 they have won four top flight games in a row. Does that help ?
He's certainly lost weight!!!Ange looks like he's aged 10 years since he got here. Same effect on Mourinho
No idea, it's baffling, but no way managers are slipping in clauses that say they can't be sacked.So why is he still here?
I can’t comprehend it if there isn’t any clause hamstringing (pardon the pun) us getting rid now!
On paper it makes sense that he would get a bonus for winning a trophy. But there's no way to confirm that without looking at the paperwork.No idea, it's baffling, but no way managers are slipping in clauses that say they can't be sacked.
This whole notion of such contract wackiness only ever came about due to the timing of the Mourinho sacking, there's never been any solid confirmation, just speculation that he must've had a clause that he'd get more money if he won a cup.
He will be a lot better in a non clown tactical systemI've held on to this but;
I'm starting to think we've over payed for Archie Gray.
Am I on my own with this lingering doubt?
If your a manager that Spurs want to sign you would only sign if you get money if sacked before end of each seasonNo idea, it's baffling, but no way managers are slipping in clauses that say they can't be sacked.
This whole notion of such contract wackiness only ever came about due to the timing of the Mourinho sacking, there's never been any solid confirmation, just speculation that he must've had a clause that he'd get more money if he won a cup.
He was going backwards every time today.
He sent at least 3 crosses into the box and was constantly shackled on the right wing.He was going backwards every time today.
Even when there was a low risk forward pass on.
I can't recall any crosses but I may be wrong.He sent at least 3 crosses into the box and was constantly shackled on the right wing.![]()
He’s not. He’s a central midfielder. That *can* and *has* played RB. Which is why with limited options, he’s played there.I can't recall any crosses but I may be wrong.
He's not a right back based on what I saw today.
He should never play there again.
I wouldn't be so sure. I mean, I hope so but the club has lost the plot.
Not in this day and age son"Siri, what is an example of the phrase 'if my auntie had bollocks she'd be my uncle'?"
And we lost at home to two of them ! FFS![]()
We are lucky those teams in the bottom three are so shit right now.