Well I mean, seeing as we have a Jewish connection to the club, can't just call him Fagan? Or will that be seen as a no no these days.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Well I mean, seeing as we have a Jewish connection to the club, can't just call him Fagan? Or will that be seen as a no no these days.
A month younger than Parrott but Parrott is allegedly not ready and we were losing and needed a goal. We have enough defenders fit and yet he came on for a few minutes while Parrott sat on the bench. Think Jose is just being stubborn in not using Parrott.
His rationale is that he's protecting Parrott so that his attitude later in his career is right - I think he should maybe concern himself with what's happening right now rather than worrying about Parrott's future
Maybe there are legit concerns about him behind the scenes?
He's happy enough to play Tanganga.
Maybe things would have turned out differently with Edwards if he hadn't been told he was the new Messi before playing a single competitive minute?
Just musing.....
but Mourinho needs to think about himself here......
I don’t think this is something he struggles with, do you?
There may well be legitimate concerns, but Mourinho needs to think about himself here......
Not normally - but that's the way he's spinning it
Because if he throws him in and he is out of his depth, it may ruin his self-confidence. He has given him an improved contract!Why is it assumed to be "spin" at all?
Like I've already noted; he's genuinely working with Tangaga. Why not Troy?
Because if he throws him in and he is out of his depth, it may ruin his self-confidence. He has given him an improved contract!
JM thinks that you don't win anything with kids, however he has now given 3 debuts to the youngsters because he will not have endless money.
Great first name, let's just leave the rest off.
OK let me make it simple for you......I'm confused how your answer correlates.....
OK let me make it simple for you......
Parrott is young, JM is paid to make big decisions.
Do you REALLY think that he wouldn't love to play him, because of our injuries.
BUT he still thinks he is too immature.
Why am I the only one glad that Fagan-Walcott got 10 minutes ?
He should do a Dele
OK let me make it simple for you......
Parrott is young, JM is paid to make big decisions.
Do you REALLY think that he wouldn't love to play him, because of our injuries.
BUT he still thinks he is too immature.
I suspect that, if we lose the grip on Europe, he will play several youngsters.
Why am I the only one glad that Fagan-Walcott got 10 minutes ?
Why criticise someone who does give 2 young players debuts, in defence, just because of Parrott.No need to be patronising.... Esp. as it turns out you hadn't grasped the thread of what I had been asking?
You're not.
Why criticise someone who does give 2 young players debuts, in defence, just because of Parrott.
It is much easier to give a forward a debut as any mistakes don't give away goals.