So because Jose likes / signed Dier, Toby, Rodon and Doherty that means they have absolutely no responsibility for what they do on the field? So in your view whenever a team fails it is 100% on the manager, all the players are what they are and never professed to be anything more, so it's all the manager's fault for signing / liking / selecting them? Come on, you can't possibly have such a narrow-minded view surely?Jose wanted Dier
Jose gave Toby a new contract
Jose signed Rodon
Jose signed Doherty
Jose cried that our whole tactics had to change when Davies was injured
Aurier managed to become PSGs RB. He's bossed for us in many games against top 6 teams and in the CL. Wasn't he great against Pool away this season too?
Sanchez when being coached well was fine alongside a more experienced head. He even got to a Europa final with Ajax.
So you're saying Jose needs better players. But also that he signs shit ones. And since we know Jose wants to control who comes in the solution is give him lots of money lol?
You seem to have this misconception that I believe Jose is some kind of god who can do no wrong - if so then I've no idea where you got it from, because having just re-read all my previous posts on this thread, I have postulated in every single one of them the possibility that Jose is ultimately to blame for the failure of our defenders. Did you read those parts?
The difference between us appears to be that I can accept numerous possibilities for our regular defensive individual errors, where as you appear to be unable to do so, having decided that there is one cause and closed your mind to any other possibilities. Just because you have a theory, it doesn't necessarily mean that you are right. Even if you believe in your theory, you should accept that other (less likely in your mind) causes could possibly be valid. And by the way, ending each post with a ridiculous statement followed by a 'lol' doesn't make what goes before it any more valid or definitively correct.
Perhaps we agree that I am open to the possibility that there could be numerous different reasons for our regular individual defensive errors, and you are not, having confirmed for certain in your mind the one and only cause? That would be an appropriate 'settlement' for me (always happy to disagree but equally always eager to find the fundamental point on which we disagree