If we will be fine with Son leading the line, then take the money surely?Frankly, he'll still do a good enough - enough being operative - job because he's clearly motivated by EPL individual records as much as team trophies. Why else city and only city? He's not guaranteed to score for fun anywhere else in the EPL because no team has that much creativity in their mid.
130 is a slap in the face. 150 or nothing. Harry can get benched if he doesn't play well enough. We'll be fine with Son leading the line and Gil dribbling defences into madness.
Agree he will still be good and score goals if he is held to his contract with us but I just don't buy that he will be the same.
He has always been driven by the goalscoring record and is by all accounts pretty greedy in front of goal, but I think he would be next level greedy at the detriment of the team if the situation got messy around him wanting out.
Also, obviously i would want 150+m for him but I don't see City paying that for a 28 year old with a history of consistent injuries over the past few years. 130m is not a slap in the face by any stretch. The bigger question is whether we invest it wisely.