I understand you’ve been having the battle of your life defending Kane’s honor and purity for over a month in this thread. I try not to engage because Kane is a class act irrespective of his transfer debacle. But I write because what you said there is very presumptuous and black and white generalization that would do more harm than good regardless of your intentions. Surely, as a “Spurs fan,” you do not want to divide the supporters, or frame or push away certain groups of people, including those who have recently started finding interests in and a fondness for our club for whatever reasons. If more and more people around the world support and regard Spurs, say, because of the likes of Son or Moura, I see it as a good sign for a club of this size and calibre (and sorry to break the news, but they may come with different perspectives). As far as a constructive criticism goes, it does not matter whether you currently own the club, your grandfather’s grave got dug up to build the new training ground, or your name is Harry Kane or Winks. People are entitled to their own opinions, and it’s not really a shocker to see criticisms towards either Harrys when we just played so poorly against Palace (while the whole transfer saga is still fresh in everyone’s mind). You might think my comment here is biased with ill-will motives, but I still respect your opinion and cause.They're Son fans, many of them here. Not Spurs fans. Don't make them out to be something they're not.
Last edited: