Why take them out?they happened?But, what are the stats for what actually happened?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Why take them out?they happened?But, what are the stats for what actually happened?
How many games did each player participate in during this period?Non Penalty Goal Contributions Since the Start of 18/19
Son: 72 goal contributions
Kane: 70 goal contributions
Non Penalty Goal Contributions Since 18/19 SeasonHow many games did each player participate in during this period?
If you want to take out the 11 game purple patch from last season, here are the stats:
Non Penalty Goal Contributions Since the Start of 18/19
Son: 58 non penalty goal contributions
Kane: 51 non penalty goal contribution
Why take them out?they happened?
But remember, Son has done more against the Big 4.So, broadly similar contributions, assuming you discard a category of goals.
Non Penalty Goal Contributions Since 18/19 SeasonCos Ndumbdumb.
Take out penalties and Kane is more or less as 'patchy' as Son.Reading comprehension issues on your part......
Why would I propose that, you muppet. My very point is that you wanting to veto Kane's assist tally is nothing more than self-serving bullshit.
Either you take out all of Sonny's purple patches too or this aspect of the conversation is a waste of time.
Non Penalty Goal Contributions Since 18/19 Season
Son: 72 non penalty goal contributions
Kane: 70 non penalty goal contributions
Repost:WOW.... Imagine..... 2 w-h-o-l-e goals during 3 years in a team that now significantly benefits Sonny's skill set.........
Enthralling stuff and definitely worth 3/4 month of consistent trolling and utter gymnastic bullshit on your part (such as the latest shit-take that any spike in Kane's numbers should be discredited).
So anyway yeh.... You'd rather we'd never had Kane during this period.
I'm glad we had both.
As I said, the excuses are nonsense because not once in that list, from The Disciples have I once heard:As has been highlighted numerous times; you can't even commit to what "it" constitutes.
Ultimately if he's finished, we'll see.... You obsessing about it (and pretending that anyone that questions the slightest thing you say is in complete polar opposition to you ) won't change anything.
WOW.... Imagine..... 2 w-h-o-l-e goals during 3 years in a team that now significantly benefits Sonny's skill set.........
Enthralling stuff and definitely worth 3/4 month of consistent trolling and utter gymnastic bullshit on your part (such as the latest shit-take that any spike in Kane's numbers should be discredited).
So anyway yeh.... You'd rather we'd never had Kane during this period.
I'm glad we had both.
Repost:
"Also, this isn't supposed to be a comparison between Kane and Son. It's meant to show how far Kane has fallen."
Wait... so now we're not playing to Kane's strengths.It really does. We played far more to Kane's strength under Poch when we had Rose/Walker overlapping and getting crosses in, we had Eriksen creating and were competent in general at set pieces, and we played one touch, combination football around the box to set Kane free for shots.
As you say, since then we've been a passive side, one who play on the counter. And this hugely benefits a counter attacking player in Son. With the ball he's often pretty ineffective, he thrives in space .. which we've been built around getting him. Especially in big games.
Those assists are no less valid because they're clustered. That would be like discounting a hat trick.
He has been since 18/19 thoughUtter bullshit...... You've stated on countless occasions in very blunt terms that Son is better.
Lucas Moura's hattrick was a fluke but Kane's 11 assists in 10 games wasn'tNo it would be like saying a hat trick is the when they usually score one goal a year
Does that offend you?Utter bullshit...... You've stated on countless occasions in very blunt terms that Son is better.
It really does. We played far more to Kane's strength under Poch when we had Rose/Walker overlapping and getting crosses in, we had Eriksen creating and were competent in general at set pieces, and we played one touch, combination football around the box to set Kane free for shots.
As you say, since then we've been a passive side, one who play on the counter. And this hugely benefits a counter attacking player in Son. With the ball he's often pretty ineffective, he thrives in space .. which we've been built around getting him. Especially in big games.
As I've said before, I honestly think even a bonafide world class CF like Lewandowski would struggle for us, because more traditional CF's in that mould NEED the right kind of service.
Waaaaaahhhhhhh why the cut off point???He has been since 18/19 though
Before that Kane was hands down better
Not anymore