They think we’re Borgnine regardless of our context
There's that fucking phrase again. Larry Niven was wrong, lack of context is the real mind killer.
Spurs may be their Borganine, but they're not Spurs' Sinatra.
If some non-spurs jewish people are offended, spurs fans can only plead with them that "the thing I love most is being a yid", is sincere, yes, it's taken on a meaning indepedent of jewshness too, but there's no hidden double meaning intended to spread hate towards jewish people or hurt their feelings.
If the intent, historic context, and the support of jewish spurs fans is not enough, then I have to ask them why not? Without a good explanation spurs fans are under no obligation to just give in. From that point I have to question their motive.
Sorry you had to go through all that mate, people are fucking idiots
I hope you at least felt like being accepted at spurs, as a yid, not a Jew, or a Muslim, or a Christian or a Buddhist, but a fucking yid
Something they’re trying to take away from us now
Cheers. I've not faced any kind of overt racism since I left school, but ironically, since I left Islam I have been accused of Islamophobia almost every time I've tried to criticise that religion (only online, under pseudonyms). The liberals who SHOULD support me for leaving that regressive religion, instead side with the muslims. My personal experience is not so bad, but ex-muslims are often attacked by left in the name of protecting the muslim minority.
It feels the same with the whole y-word nonsense. The high-minded liberals should be on Spurs' side, but in their overzealous crusade to stamp out racism, they are attacking the very people they're supposedly trying to protect.
It's doublespeak in the proper 1984 meaning of the word. The victims of islam are islamophobes, the gentiles who defend the jew against abuse are actually his abusers. These aren't the only examples either.