That's fine, but Ange Out people should be responsive to the challenge of midseason managerial replacements IN GENERAL.Anybody who wants to keep him is perfectly entitled to his opinion. That being said, this pestering of people who want him gone to provide any alternatives is disingenious. Only purpose is to take advantage of the fact that most of us here are not football junkies who religiously follow hundreds of team and their managers. The fact that someone can't readily provide a list of successors for Ange doesn't mean that he's irrational in wanting him gone. Besides, even if people do provide names, they're usually met with one-liners like "X got his team relegated", "Y lost a cup final", "Z would never work with Levy" and so on. Since it's impossible to prove a purely hypothetical ("How would X do here if he replaced Ange tomorrow?" ), Ange critics are beaten into submission to no fault of their own.
Again, you're perfectly justified in wanting him to stay. Personally, if the decision was between having 6 months of an interim and keeping Ange, I'd inclined to keep him. But some people think that he sank so below replacement level that anybody half-decent would do better. You don't have to agree, but it's not an irrational stance just because they're not able to name dozens of potential replacements.
You don't sack a manager as an act of divine judgment on the merits of that manager, you sack a manager to improve results.
Do people really think another Mason caretaker spell would accomplish that?