• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
I just cannot fathom how a headless chicken manager in Frank is still in charge.

Shameful in truth.

The odd glimpse of something half decent is completely secondary to the standard dross he has presided over thus far.
We’ll limp on until the summer unless the wheels truly come off.

Frank will only be retained IMHO if we see a very different second half to the season with a clear improvement in results and style.
 
Said it in the other thread but this makes Frank the most backed manager we've ever had. High wage, high transfer fee players in their mid to late 20's.

Nonsense really though isn't it. Previous manager spent over £400m in 1.5 seasons, and was backed to get rid of Lloris, Hojbjerg, Perisic, and Dier - basically the entire leadership team. Had super-wages on Werner and for a lot of the time just left him on the sidelines, and then was kept in the job until the end of the season when he'd have been sacked a long time prior at any other club (as did happen after).

This idea of Frank being "the most backed manager" is an absurd notion
 
Nonsense really though isn't it. Previous manager spent over £400m in 1.5 seasons, and was backed to get rid of Lloris, Hojbjerg, Perisic, and Dier - basically the entire leadership team. Had super-wages on Werner and for a lot of the time just left him on the sidelines, and then was kept in the job until the end of the season when he'd have been sacked a long time prior at any other club (as did happen after).

This idea of Frank being "the most backed manager" is an absurd notion

Fees mean nothing

First 11 ready, high wage, peak age players

Frank is on the receiving end of a clear change in policy at the club.
 
Pretty sure that Simons. Muani, Gallagher and Romero will be on much bigger wages than any of them

The closest we had was a season of Kane, Son and Perisic

According to capology, our wage bill has gone down by 11 million, so even if you say we replaced Son with Simons, there's a black hole there. Not sure why you've counting a small bump for Romero like renewing his contract means frank is being "backed"???

These are the capology numbers from last season

Maddison: £170k (signed for AP)
Vicario: £75k (signed for AP)
Solanke: £140k (signed for AP)
Danso: £25k (signed for AP)
Werner: £165k (loaned for AP)
Romero: £165k
Son: £190k

And this season

Romero: £195k
Simons: £195k (signed for TF)
Muani: £150k (loaned for TF)
Kudus: £150k (signed for TF)


No idea what Conor Gallagher will earn, but I'm not seeing a huge difference there. Maddison and Solanke wages are negligible difference to Simons and Kudus, and Muani is a cheaper loan than Werner
 
Nonsense really though isn't it. Previous manager spent over £400m in 1.5 seasons, and was backed to get rid of Lloris, Hojbjerg, Perisic, and Dier - basically the entire leadership team. Had super-wages on Werner and for a lot of the time just left him on the sidelines, and then was kept in the job until the end of the season when he'd have been sacked a long time prior at any other club (as did happen after).

This idea of Frank being "the most backed manager" is an absurd notion
Fair play to you. You're determined to die on the hill of "...but the previous manager...".
 
Fair play to you. You're determined to die on the hill of "...but the previous manager...".

When the argument being made is a comparative one, how else is it analysed?

"He's been back more than anyone before!"
"The last manager was backed just as much if not more"

"OMFG WHY DO YOU KEEP BRINGING UP THE PAST"

See - it's idiotic
 
Nonsense really though isn't it. Previous manager spent over £400m in 1.5 seasons, and was backed to get rid of Lloris, Hojbjerg, Perisic, and Dier - basically the entire leadership team. Had super-wages on Werner and for a lot of the time just left him on the sidelines, and then was kept in the job until the end of the season when he'd have been sacked a long time prior at any other club (as did happen after).

This idea of Frank being "the most backed manager" is an absurd notion

Yeah previous manager also had to deal with the sale of world class ,record goalscorer, club captain and all round legend Harry Kane....... For just 80 mill, and he wasn't even allowed to bring in a replacement striker until the following summer and the best the club could afford was Dom Solanke

The club had let down every manager we've had. Why single out Ange, ask Conte how much he was backed,Jose the same.

That 400 mill is typical Tottenham spending on transfer fees for average players on average wages. It's what this club do.
 
Yeah previous manager also had to deal with the sale of world class ,record goalscorer, club captain and all round legend Harry Kane....... For just 80 mill, and he wasn't even allowed to bring in a replacement striker until the following summer and the best the club could afford was Dom Solanke

The club had let down every manager we've had. Why single out Ange, ask Conte how much he was backed,Jose the same.

That 400 mill is typical Tottenham spending on transfer fees for average players on average wages. It's what this club do.

Firstly, because Jose and Conte both had next to no funds because of Covid after effects.
Secondly, because up until recently people haven't stopped complaining that no manager is ever backed.

Current manager "also had to deal with the sale of world class ,4th highest record goalscorer, club captain and all round legend Heung Min Son"

It's very weird for people to all of a sudden claim that 2 new signings and one on loan, without replacing Son, is suddenly the metric for "being backed" - especially when people are simultaneously claiming this is a preemptive Poch signing.
 
Yeah previous manager also had to deal with the sale of world class ,record goalscorer, club captain and all round legend Harry Kane....... For just 80 mill, and he wasn't even allowed to bring in a replacement striker until the following summer and the best the club could afford was Dom Solanke

The club had let down every manager we've had. Why single out Ange, ask Conte how much he was backed,Jose the same.

That 400 mill is typical Tottenham spending on transfer fees for average players on average wages. It's what this club do.
Pointless making nuanced arguments with him. He's a genuine, committed fan, but is completely wedded to his one eyed view.
 
According to capology, our wage bill has gone down by 11 million, so even if you say we replaced Son with Simons, there's a black hole there. Not sure why you've counting a small bump for Romero like renewing his contract means frank is being "backed"???

These are the capology numbers from last season

Maddison: £170k (signed for AP)
Vicario: £75k (signed for AP)
Solanke: £140k (signed for AP)
Danso: £25k (signed for AP)
Werner: £165k (loaned for AP)
Romero: £165k
Son: £190k

And this season

Romero: £195k
Simons: £195k (signed for TF)
Muani: £150k (loaned for TF)
Kudus: £150k (signed for TF)


No idea what Conor Gallagher will earn, but I'm not seeing a huge difference there. Maddison and Solanke wages are negligible difference to Simons and Kudus, and Muani is a cheaper loan than Werner

Romero: £195k
Simons: £195k (signed for TF)
Muani: £150k (loaned for TF)
Kudus: £150k (signed for TF)
Palinha: £135k (loaned for TF)
Gallagher: £180k (signed for TF) approx

I had expected Palinha and Muani to be on 200k tbh. Those wages for Bayern and PSG seem misreported. Or maybe sign on. fees made up the rest of their wage offers.

still, in 2 windows vs 3 for Ange, and Ange had way more come off the wage bill than Frank. Kane, Lloris, Perisic, Hojberg all came off the wage bill. Frank is still getting different treatment than anyone since Poch. SImons is the first players since Ndombele signed on wages that high when they arrived.
 
People tell I'm condescending... that means I talk down to them.

Honestly though - go stalk people in the appropriate thread or scroll past if you can't even bear the slightest concept that we had a manager before our current one that was sacked for being a bit shit.

There have been people in there policing opinion and calling each other abusive words because he's like a protected species, and now here you are - in Thomas Frank's thread - acting like a child because I am pointing out that the current manager is not the most backed manager we have ever had.

As I say, click ignore, don't look in here, whatever - you're just as culpable as some of the others for sniping at the mere reference of "previous manager" like it's a banned phrase ffs.
 
Firstly, because Jose and Conte both had next to no funds because of Covid after effects.
Secondly, because up until recently people haven't stopped complaining that no manager is ever backed.

Current manager "also had to deal with the sale of world class ,4th highest record goalscorer, club captain and all round legend Heung Min Son"

It's very weird for people to all of a sudden claim that 2 new signings and one on loan, without replacing Son, is suddenly the metric for "being backed" - especially when people are simultaneously claiming this is a preemptive Poch signing.

Kane was sold at his peak to Bayern Munich, Son was sold way past his peak to somewhere in LA

I said that no manager is truly backed, including Frank.

Conte wanted Bastoni, he was given Lenglet on loan. That had nothing to do with COVID after effects.

But it's ok, you carry on believing Ange was backed and every other manager has an excuse for not being backed :frankfacepalm:
 
still, in 2 windows vs 3 for Ange, and Ange had way more come off the wage bill than Frank. Kane, Lloris, Perisic, Hojberg all came off the wage bill. Frank is still getting different treatment than anyone since Poch. SImons is the first players since Ndombele signed on wages that high when they arrived.

It's been 6.5 years since Pochettino left. The Bank of England puts £100 in 2019 worth £130 in todays money, so if that works in football then Ndombele's £200k suddenly turns into a £260k wage, which we're no where near now. Why do you count Romero's new contract going up to £195k though? He's not a new signing and, apples-to-apples, Son signed a new contract a year ago up to the same wage and that isn't registering in the critique.

It's incredibly strange to see one side of the fan base already cunting off the Gallagher signing as if he's a clogger that won't add anything, and another side suggesting it's an opulent signing - the scale of which is unmatched. Thomas Frank seems like the new Levy - if you don't like him, that's fine. If you have something factual to support that, even more so - but I find it incredibly strange if you have to manufacturer and stretch definitions to get to that point.
 
Back
Top