• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
That's just stupid. The question is whether we'd have been more likely to win if we'd played like PSG and the answer is yes.

Pulling the wool over your own eyes by pretending that we played well in the final is not helpful. We played with our backs against the wall, and it worked out. Great - but most of the time it doesn't.

Not sure why people are dumping on the way we played in the final. The way played in the final is not an issue. We played with the cards we dealt on the day. It's the league results that are the issue.
 
I believe though we would have been more forward thinking and created more chances had we had an attacking midfielder fit! Utd had everyone fit pretty much. Agree it was a dire game.
Can't deny that.

I was unimpressed with our use of the ball though. Felt like 90 minutes of us just hoofing it back to them, one occasion we played a few passes in midfield and Solanke (from Udogie) could have been clear on goal but for a poor touch.

The midfielders on the pitch should have been more than capable of making a few composed passes and retaining possession, without having to be Zidane about it.
 
We did defend well yes. I'd take issue with "zero creativity" at our disposal though. Really? We had Bentancur, Son, Odobert, Porro, VdV, Sarr, Moore. Not exactly Zidanes any of them, but again, it's whether the manager has coached them well and set them up well.

Overall our EL run did not tell the story of a really well-coached side that is going places. Maybe the Bodo games and Qarabag at home were the exception. But they are championship/League One level teams tbf.

I too can make a long list of not very creative players and point out they aren't Zidane but I'm not sure what your point is other than to highlight just how much fucking work we need to do in the Transfer market whoever the next manager is.
 
Not sure why people are dumping on the way we played in the final. The way played in the final is not an issue. We played with the cards we dealt on the day. It's the league results that are the issue.

It's fucking incredible, the lengths that people will go to to downplay that win

Same people who would have moaned had we played 'Ange ball' in the final, dominated Utd and got picked off on the counter.

This thread is batshit mental :D
 
Out of curiosity, is anyone able to tell me our xg, shots on goals, touches in box, progressive dribbles or field tilt etc from the 84 final?

Winning on pens sounds more of a blag than within 90 mins but we never talk about the 84 win like that, against an absolute European minow.
 
There's greater context around it than just comparing the two matches, Klopp already had so much credit with the Liverpool board/supporters, they weren't coming off of a league season where they finished 17th, the didn't look poorly coached and barely able to do the basics of football in nigh on every game, and they weren't playing a side as dismal as Man Utd.

If you are looking to the Europa win to outweigh the abject League performance, then it requires more than just a "by hook or by crook" scrape a win performance to do so.

Is it nice to have won the trophy, absoluteley, but was there anything about that performance that only Ange could have coached? Was there anything about it to excite you for the following season? Was it the origin of a great footballing dynasty?

For me the answer is no to all of the above.

If we'd have come out, played them off the park, and swashbuckled our way to a 6-0 trouncing, then there might be a more difficult debate to be had.

i'm not talking about the Ange in Ange out debate, that's boring to me.

I'm just amused how spurs fans love to diminish us winning our 1st European trophy since before i was born, only our 4th in the clubs very long history just because they hate the guy basically. it's silly

enjoy it, there's a good chance alot of us will be dead the next time it happens
tottenham-hotspur-v-manchester-united-uefa-europa-league-final-2025.jpeg
 
Of course it's cherry picked, I'm making a point that we had zero attacking threat apart from one scuffed goal. You don't make that point by, I dunno, citing the number of throw-ins.

The defensive stats aren't particularly amazing other than the clear sheet at the end.

We didn't need any more attacking threat, and if we had, we would have. The point you're making is completely irrelevant.

United, with all their possession and 'threat' did nothing - we had a better XG than them.

Our defence > their attack
Our attack > their defence
 
Not sure why people are dumping on the way we played in the final. The way played in the final is not an issue. We played with the cards we dealt on the day. It's the league results that are the issue.

The wins over Frankfurt, Bodo and United were ugly, scrappy, grit and determination wins by a club with not that many good options and in all sorts of terrible form in the League simply determined to find a way to win.

Only complete fuckwits think this is "a bad thing". It's one of the greatest things to happen at Spurs in 40 odd years.
 
Yea, I mean, I could not give less fucks how excactly won the final. We came out of it on top and that is what matters in final.

On the other hand, to me winning last season EL is hardly as big of an achievement as some people try to make it look. It is league into which the best teams cannot come. All the teams we had to beat COMBINED would have likely similar resources than we do. It is far inferior to CL and also to Premier League. I cannot fully understand what is the reasoning or logic, but I read everywhere that "But we won! It's a trophy". Maybe the fault is with me. That I cannot look at anything on so simplistic level. To me there is also context that matters. And if in order to win far inferior league we totally give up on much thougher league, it is not a good sign. Sports for me is about being the best. And of course - only one can be best in every competition. But you should prove your worth on highest level possible. In that we failed badly in past season.

Other thing is that all other managers faced higher standards - they had to compete in League and then try to win something outside of the league as well. May it be CL (Poch) or domestic cup (Harry, Poch and Mou), but it all had to be done on top of EPL not at full expense of it.

So for me, despite EL being literally the first trophy as Spurs fan (discovered club football at 2009) and despite that weird fact I still do not see that winning EL on its own would be enough of a reason to keep a manager. This side is riddled with very massive underlying issues and in big picture it has just been getting worse in last 12 months time. So please, let's make a quick decision. Rip off the bandages, appoint new manager and start preparations for CL + EPL season asap.
 
Liverpool had also just won the league at a canter and could rightly claim to be the best team in Europe all season, so no, I don't imagine it factored into their analysis of why they were otherwise dogshit.

:sonmask:

Also worth noting that we didn't really trouble Liverpool in that game.

uh huh, shouldve smashed a poor spurs team on the decline without their best player by a lot more then shouldnt they the useless cunts . Im afraid the CL win doesnt count
:levylol:
 
Out of curiosity, is anyone able to tell me our xg, shots on goals, touches in box, progressive dribbles or field tilt etc from the 84 final?

Winning on pens sounds more of a blag than within 90 mins but we never talk about the 84 win like that, against an absolute European minow.
I cant tell you the stats but it was a high quality game. Anderlecht were a shit hot side back then, not minnows.
 
It's not that we shouldn't have appointed Jose. We should have backed him properly after appointing him.
I'd swap Jose for Conte in that sentiment. The moment after getting 4th, was there for us that summer and we didn't go as hard as we should have done.. I know history has been rewritten that he was always miserable and never liked it here... But I remember the italian press that were close to him that summer were insistent that he liked it at Tottenham and wanted to make us winners.
 
We didn't need any more attacking threat, and if we had, we would have. The point you're making is completely irrelevant.

United, with all their possession and 'threat' did nothing - we had a better XG than them.

Our defence > their attack
Our attack > their defence

Yes, United were dogshit. Thanks for making that point.

Most sides we face in the CL won't be.
 
Amazing stat. Our last two trophies before the EL win were helmed by Juande Ramos and the worst football I've seen us play in 40 years under George Graham. Obviously both club legends thanks to their incredible managerial job at Spurs, right? Madness to sack them.

Did they win a European Trophy? No. Did they provide good league seasons? No.

Trophies won by Harry Redknapp at Spurs: 0
Trophies won by Mauricio Pochettino at Spurs: 0.

Brilliant league seasons. No fucking trophies.

I have now witnessed Spurs win a European Trophy live. Nothing else matters right now. I'm sad for you that you don't understand this.
 
Back
Top