Well of course.
For Mr Dyche, I'd sack Ange myself.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Well of course.
That's just stupid. The question is whether we'd have been more likely to win if we'd played like PSG and the answer is yes.
Pulling the wool over your own eyes by pretending that we played well in the final is not helpful. We played with our backs against the wall, and it worked out. Great - but most of the time it doesn't.
Can't deny that.I believe though we would have been more forward thinking and created more chances had we had an attacking midfielder fit! Utd had everyone fit pretty much. Agree it was a dire game.
We did defend well yes. I'd take issue with "zero creativity" at our disposal though. Really? We had Bentancur, Son, Odobert, Porro, VdV, Sarr, Moore. Not exactly Zidanes any of them, but again, it's whether the manager has coached them well and set them up well.
Overall our EL run did not tell the story of a really well-coached side that is going places. Maybe the Bodo games and Qarabag at home were the exception. But they are championship/League One level teams tbf.
European Trophies won by a Spurs manager not named Ange Postecoglou in the last 40 years - 0
![]()
Not sure why people are dumping on the way we played in the final. The way played in the final is not an issue. We played with the cards we dealt on the day. It's the league results that are the issue.
We ain’t backing no manger ever. That is the one universal truth.It's not that we shouldn't have appointed Jose. We should have backed him properly after appointing him.
We ain’t backing no manger ever. That is the one universal truth.
There's greater context around it than just comparing the two matches, Klopp already had so much credit with the Liverpool board/supporters, they weren't coming off of a league season where they finished 17th, the didn't look poorly coached and barely able to do the basics of football in nigh on every game, and they weren't playing a side as dismal as Man Utd.
If you are looking to the Europa win to outweigh the abject League performance, then it requires more than just a "by hook or by crook" scrape a win performance to do so.
Is it nice to have won the trophy, absoluteley, but was there anything about that performance that only Ange could have coached? Was there anything about it to excite you for the following season? Was it the origin of a great footballing dynasty?
For me the answer is no to all of the above.
If we'd have come out, played them off the park, and swashbuckled our way to a 6-0 trouncing, then there might be a more difficult debate to be had.
Of course it's cherry picked, I'm making a point that we had zero attacking threat apart from one scuffed goal. You don't make that point by, I dunno, citing the number of throw-ins.
The defensive stats aren't particularly amazing other than the clear sheet at the end.
liverpool won the CL final against us with 39% possession
and 3 attempts on target all game

Not sure why people are dumping on the way we played in the final. The way played in the final is not an issue. We played with the cards we dealt on the day. It's the league results that are the issue.
Liverpool had also just won the league at a canter and could rightly claim to be the best team in Europe all season, so no, I don't imagine it factored into their analysis of why they were otherwise dogshit.
Also worth noting that we didn't really trouble Liverpool in that game.

At last. Someone gets it. And explains it far better than I could
![]()
I cant tell you the stats but it was a high quality game. Anderlecht were a shit hot side back then, not minnows.Out of curiosity, is anyone able to tell me our xg, shots on goals, touches in box, progressive dribbles or field tilt etc from the 84 final?
Winning on pens sounds more of a blag than within 90 mins but we never talk about the 84 win like that, against an absolute European minow.
I'd swap Jose for Conte in that sentiment. The moment after getting 4th, was there for us that summer and we didn't go as hard as we should have done.. I know history has been rewritten that he was always miserable and never liked it here... But I remember the italian press that were close to him that summer were insistent that he liked it at Tottenham and wanted to make us winners.It's not that we shouldn't have appointed Jose. We should have backed him properly after appointing him.
We didn't need any more attacking threat, and if we had, we would have. The point you're making is completely irrelevant.
United, with all their possession and 'threat' did nothing - we had a better XG than them.
Our defence > their attack
Our attack > their defence
Amazing stat. Our last two trophies before the EL win were helmed by Juande Ramos and the worst football I've seen us play in 40 years under George Graham. Obviously both club legends thanks to their incredible managerial job at Spurs, right? Madness to sack them.