-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Manager Ange Postecoglou
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
nice one mate .. stop it..nonsensical
you do appear to be easily confused from what i have read of your contributions to mankind on here.. but carry on. It's insightful stuff.
okay so no counter that losing 1 game in 6 is supposedly being schooled...it was just a garbage post.
got it.
carry on
This is false
If I recall the only time we've really 'heavily rotated' is against Ferenchvaros, Besiktas we played with 5/6 starters - the rest have been pretty much almost all first 11.
It’s secret but happy to answer any specific enquiries you might have
Are you alright? Where have I said anything of the sort?
I've said a change of ownership won't be the path to utopia, and also said ENIC should have been ousted after Super League.
Never mentioned things getting worse, or wanted ENIC to stay.
I think we'll be the same as we are with new owners. A 4th to 7th club.
Aside from not sure what the relevance is exactly. It'd cost me an airfare from the other side of the world for starters.
So no.
Like last season when we lost a load of games….
When did we play Besiktas, must have missed that one.
Qarabag, Ferencvaros, AZ all had Moore and Bergvall starting. Ferencvaros also had Lankshear starting.
I don’t mind you disagreeing, but please provide some evidence - so far you’ve provided none. Our starting line ups have been heavily rotated for Europe
Don’t startle and confuse him with facts - we know he can’t deal with them
You mean you want me to disprove your weak ass theory because you're incapable of using Google, okay then
vs Qarabag, where' the 'heavy rotation' here? Note we played with 10 men for about 80 mins as well.
And I obviously meant AZ when I said Besiktas
Ferenchvaros I already said we went weak
We've played 6 games so far in the EL and 2 out of 6 games we've rotated significantly, the rest no so what are you talking about?
WWAH’s.
Them and the TWAT’s don’t know they are born.
Anyone who is going into the Tottenham Hotspur stadium as a paying customer is one of life’s winners. Fact.
What a lovely contribution
Who
has made to the forum. Around 75 posts, the vast majority in the Ange Postecoglou thread and every single one of them slagging the manager off.
Brilliant stuff. Illuminating; thought-provoking; the kind of all round contribution that makes TFC a brand leader in football discussion forums.
10/10 - would read again...
Brilliant stuff. Illuminating; thought-provoking; the kind of all round contribution that makes TFC a brand leader in football discussion forums.
10/10 - would read again...
It’s relevant - it’s easy to say we are in the top 6 alls good but it doesn’t factor in our history (50’s to 80’s of being London biggest club), nor the cost and effort of expecting more than that (based on ridiculous ticket orices). Relevant context you are missing
I could argue you're missing context that when the first division changed to the EPL and money exploded from there we missed the boat. We were a club that through out the 90s was not particularly well run and other clubs got the march on us and we've never recovered that lost ground.
Ticket prices are a uniquely football centric issue. I have a season ticket to a different sport and pay hundred's a year for the privilege and have held that ticket for all but 6 years of my life, and never have moaned about the money spent and that creating an expectation for success. Season tickets regardless of the sport should be for the entertainment value with success being the cherry on top, and this seems to be how it works in Rugby, NFL, NBA, MLB etc. etc. Football tribalism in England ruins that, the pressure to succeed is largely based off not wanting to be the victim of office banter at work.
The price charged by Spurs may be high, and it should be lower. Being a London club wouldn't help with the price setting as costs would be higher in the capital.
So can we just guess??List of things Ange isn't interested in:
- Rashford,
- Set pieces,
- Defending,
- Abuse from Spurs fans,
- Whether people like him or not.....
Feel free to continue the list.
If so
- ladyboys
- the slimfast diet
- haute couture fashion
- words that start with the letter Q.
Think your incorrect here Shady. When we had a full strength squad, we were rotating heavily. All of Gray, Dragusin, Davies, Bergval, Werner, Richarlison and Moore started games and none of them would be regarded as first team. Unforunately the squad has been so decimated with injuries that we've only been able to make 2/3 changes for last 2 games but first 3 games, we definitely made atleast 5 in each game.
You can't be certain that new ownership won't yield a positive change because you don't know who any potential new owner will be.
That itself is a certainty. You can't be certain.
What is certain is that nothing will change now, not with these leeches.
Where have I said anything remotely close to something that's certain?
I have also not said not to change ownership.
I just don't believe ownership is what's stopping us becoming a title chasing club and that the likelihood is the status quo remains similar just a different name on the chairman's door.
You've said a few times, in very certain terms, that changing owners won't change anything.