• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
i think a young up and comer wants to go up a level. some are more patient and perhaps pickier than others and choose to avoid a club like spurs and wait for a better destination. most just want to raise their profile and triple their pay with a guaranteed contract and sort it out after they get sacked.

honestly i don't think we're that bad of a job. true, we're not a club that wants to compete at the highest level and we don't spend in way that that would require, but i don't think we make claims to be at that level. we want to hover around top 4 and win the occasional cup and hope we get lucky with generational talent we uncover. we got close with poch and kane and kind of shot ourselves in the foot by building the stadium at the same time and then desperately turning to jose and conte to rescue it but we aren't the club that's going to support managers like that. i think ange was an attempt at getting back to who we are we just backed the wrong horse.

Agreed with a lot of this.

It's why I think a Silva or a Marco Rose are a better fit for us (and NO, it's not because I want a manager with the first name, Marco).
 
the whole things beyond strange. weve got a 'manager' that cant look people in the eye and has not once spoke about actual football or tactics.....HELLOOOOOOO! what the fuck is this shit.
His interview style got him a lot of positive feedback at first, but ironically it's now probably the source of a lot of the negativity toward him. I think sometimes foreign managers have an advantage because they can get away with saying less. Postecoglou is going to launch into long discussion of himself and his philosophy and I think it's just worn thin over time.
 
As an Aussie it's sad to say but the reality is that the Premier League is a level too far for Ange. He hasnt adapted to how football is played at the higher levels in Europe, rather he has tried to import the Australian model where the sporting mindset is one which promotes physicality and athleticism over tactical and strategic nous.

Ange just doesn't have the capability of adapting his tactics or rotating his squad effectively, he uses a set base of players, runs them to the ground and repeats again until there is barely anyone left to form a starting 11. It works in Aus or other lesser leagues where you can physically out perform opponents in leagues with less games and no cup competitions, it doesnt here against opponents who are physically at peak fitness themselves managed by people who get the most out of their squads and play smarter football.

I wish it worked for Ange, but the last few months especially have shown that this is a level too far. I commend him for putting himself out there to try and compete at the highest level but it hasn't worked. It's a level where you need to adapt and be flexible in your startegy whilst protecting your players, not trying to train them as if they're thoroughbred race horses, inevitably this is what happens, a squad of perpetually injured players and no ideas in how to fix it.
 
Last edited:
Exactly we have no idea of how to transition the ball from A to B. If we have the space it may work but again all passes have to come off. Otherwise we can’t even get into oppo half without losing the ball. If we somehow get high up then no one wants to shoot or cross.
Possession doesn't equal advantage. Think about all the times you've felt like a team was just about to score in the final third because they are applying pressure and taking the defense out of their shape. Spurs are usually slow to arrive in the final third and don't apply much pressure.
 
Please just make more and more excuses for Ange. What is the excuse for losing 4-0 to Newcastle last season or 3-0 to Fulham. What is the excuse for losing 2-1 at home to Luton or throwing away a 2-0 half time lead to Brighton last season.

There are red flags all over Ange’s record at Spurs. Personally I do not care what he did at Celtic or Marinos. What I care about is we are 15th in the league 8 points above relegation and have more losses than wins and draws combined. We constantly give away stupid goals from defensive mistakes even with Cuti and Micky fit. Under Ange we constantly setting new firsts that no team wants. The opposition has scored the first goal at home more times in a calendar year than any other team in the Premier League.

The fact that people can wipe away everything saying it is because of the injuries then don’t consider that his style of play may aggravate the injury process.

Then the biggest flag I have seen about Ange is the simple fact he has allowed himself to be surrounded by second rate coaching staff. Even that could be forgiven if he looked to strengthen the coaching staff instead of weakening it by bringing in the Aussie and his assistant.

Ange then ignores the small margins in the game which can win you games. Our throw ins and set pieces look uncoached and also the fact we don’t make the right foils in transition.

It is simple the Spurs Job is too big for him and nothing he has done/ will do, is going to make it any better.

Between the "it's down to injuries crew" and the "not yet without a plan" crew, we unfortunately have too much of the fan base still living in denial.
 
i think a young up and comer wants to go up a level. some are more patient and perhaps pickier than others and choose to avoid a club like spurs and wait for a better destination. most just want to raise their profile and triple their pay with a guaranteed contract and sort it out after they get sacked.

honestly i don't think we're that bad of a job. true, we're not a club that wants to compete at the highest level and we don't spend in way that that would require, but i don't think we make claims to be at that level. we want to hover around top 4 and win the occasional cup and hope we get lucky with generational talent we uncover. we got close with poch and kane and kind of shot ourselves in the foot by building the stadium at the same time and then desperately turning to jose and conte to rescue it but we aren't the club that's going to support managers like that. i think ange was an attempt at getting back to who we are we just backed the wrong horse.

Let’s be honest. How many bigger jobs are out there than the Tottenham job, maybe 5 clubs in England (city, pool, Woolwich, Chelsea and united) Bayern, the two Spanish giants, juventus maybe, and for money and city PSG. That isn’t a huge amount of jobs for the 1000’s of managers competing for roles. Plus 90% of the above have younger coaches who should be at the job for at least 3 more years. That’s a lifetime in management! if Iraola has a bad season at Bournemouth next year (maybe two games a week, likely sell their best players during the summer etc) he might never get a shot at a big job again. I think with our young squad and similar style he would jump at the chance. We could also easily pay him £5-6m a year for a good long contract which dwarfs his 2 year £1m per season at Bournemouth
 
Ange has some part to play in it, and he’s the manager so ultimately it’s his responsibility but if you really think he’s to blame and it’s not because the squad has been left short, you really need to give your head a wobble.

It’s both. We’re short of players AND Ange didn’t help with his lack of rotation and subs early on. I haven’t listened to the pod but have seen some of the quotes elsewhere. At the moment they aren’t overtraining but probably because everyone is being wrapped in bubble wrap. Earlier on when we didn’t have loads of injuries and back to back games, maybe that was different.

It’s like the old saying that shit happens to everyone, but why is shit always happening to Ange? The squad has been left criminally thin but there’s enough smoke to say that something we’re doing behind the scenes has contributed .
 
Let’s be honest. How many bigger jobs are out there than the Tottenham job, maybe 5 clubs in England (city, pool, Woolwich, Chelsea and united) Bayern, the two Spanish giants, juventus maybe, and for money and city PSG.

I make it about 17 jobs bigger than the Spurs job.

City, Liverpool, Woolwich, Chelsea, United, Barca, Athletico, Real, AC Milan, Inter Milan, Juventus, Napoli, Lazio, PSG, Bayern, Dotrmund, RedBull L

Also worth considering Ajax, Porto, Savilla, Benfica and maybe Newcastle.

Most of those clubs are also more attractive for players, with guarenteed Champs League football year after year.
 
I've definitely been saying it since they made five subs permanent (which for the record I didn't and don't support, it enables fixture congestion, advantages richer teams, and in general makes the game more cardiovascular and less creative)


You're just not going to have the domination over games in the PL that you can in SPL or elsewhere.

And the relationship between tactics and muscular taxation management is the kind of thing I don't think our sports science folks have a very keen grasp on at all, to the extent anyone does. This kind of thing is at the cutting edge currently.

In all honesty I don't claim to know exactly. It just seems obvious to me that the optimum substitution strategy in today's football with 5 available is more and earlier in some form or fashion than it was with three subs playing much less cardio-demanding tactics 20 years ago, and yet the substitution patterns remain basically the same.

Send players out knowing they'll only play 45 minutes so they can do so at higher intensity? Hockey-esque "line changes", I mean there could be lots of wrinkles to it.

I really am surprised there isn't more experimentation happening on this basis.
Fully agree on the last point and we were definitely expecting more like that from Ange. I think he’s been deterred a bit by all the extra time that gets played at the end of games due to non-stop time-wasting in this league.

Per your first point, I think we have seen domination over games in the PL when teams have admitted that they couldn’t do anything to keep the ball. We definitely can’t do it right now with the injuries but with a relatively fresh squad, there’s probably 3 - 4 teams in the PL where we weren’t expecting 60%+ possession and huge territory advantages.
 
tell me what they're doing in training that's so normal and safe. nobody knows. you ange dead enders continue to amaze me with your cognitive dissonance. enic is inept and yet they hired the perfect manager who's only a complete failure because of the people who hired him as opposed to the inept management hired and inept manager.
Tell me what they are doing in training that isn’t normal and safe. You are the one making the claims here, not me.
 
Please just make more and more excuses for Ange. What is the excuse for losing 4-0 to Newcastle last season or 3-0 to Fulham. What is the excuse for losing 2-1 at home to Luton or throwing away a 2-0 half time lead to Brighton last season.

There are red flags all over Ange’s record at Spurs. Personally I do not care what he did at Celtic or Marinos. What I care about is we are 15th in the league 8 points above relegation and have more losses than wins and draws combined. We constantly give away stupid goals from defensive mistakes even with Cuti and Micky fit. Under Ange we constantly setting new firsts that no team wants. The opposition has scored the first goal at home more times in a calendar year than any other team in the Premier League.

The fact that people can wipe away everything saying it is because of the injuries then don’t consider that his style of play may aggravate the injury process.

Then the biggest flag I have seen about Ange is the simple fact he has allowed himself to be surrounded by second rate coaching staff. Even that could be forgiven if he looked to strengthen the coaching staff instead of weakening it by bringing in the Aussie and his assistant.

Ange then ignores the small margins in the game which can win you games. Our throw ins and set pieces look uncoached and also the fact we don’t make the right foils in transition.

It is simple the Spurs Job is too big for him and nothing he has done/ will do, is going to make it any better.
Not what we are talking about here.
 

View: https://x.com/stoppassingback/status/1881759399389348174?s=46&t=fbqxNuG9CT4qTaiJx8mBjg


In the words of Shadydan Shadydan Ali Gold cooked here.

If you’ve allowed yourself to buy into the idea that Ange’s training is at fault for injuries, have a word with yourself. You’ve just got carried away with an internet narrative,

Sameway, our defenders don’t actually do any more sprints than the next team so it isn’t the system causing injuries either.

Ange has some part to play in it, and he’s the manager so ultimately it’s his responsibility but if you really think he’s to blame and it’s not because the squad has been left short, you really need to give your head a wobble.


Doesn't suit the narrative though
 
It's a matter of scalability.

Even with the injuries sustained last season we still managed to finish 5th despite a shaky 2nd half of the season, because we played 1 game a week.

Shift to 3 games a week and the wheels fall off.

Ange's failure to find solutions coupled with a lack of squad depth able to compete on all fronts has resulted in this dumpster fire of a season.

Ange will take the Executioners Axe, but this is a collective failure that in my opinion won't be solved by JUST changing the manager.

Agree.

And tbh, whether or not the club realizes at the end of the year that they went into this half baked and need you change direction, the most likely person to rescue anything from this season in the meantime, is IMO Ange because he has more experience in his system and the challenges unique to it.
 
Back
Top