We did it with Conte and got 4th.Good luck getting someone in 10 games into the season and not giving him a preseason.
That's way too risky. Chelsea did the same with Di Matteo and they had to get Benitez in for the rest of the season.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
We did it with Conte and got 4th.Good luck getting someone in 10 games into the season and not giving him a preseason.
That's way too risky. Chelsea did the same with Di Matteo and they had to get Benitez in for the rest of the season.
I understand the risks of it but I just think sacking him now would actually have a negative impact if I am completely honest.
Because Conte was available.
I completely get this logic as well and it’s a fair point but again, I think the ramifications of sacking him now and the negative impact that would have on the squad would outweigh that.I think the main issue is if the league form is still terrible after ten games we would have wasted the summer window and need a new manager.
I was hearing the same thing people talking about how it can negatively impact the dressing room. It was the only decent argument I heard to keep him.I understand the risks of it but I just think sacking him now would actually have a negative impact if I am completely honest.
I think the squad being behind him still is the real driving factor in keeping him tbh.
Because we’ve just won a cup and fans are mostly emotional idiots who are blinded by it and have now forgotten a year and a half of shite because we beat 16th in a final.
I hope and trust the club are not as emotional or idiotic. Paratici especially. Not a huge fan of him but he is ruthless and will look at the facts. This is not a man to lead us to consistent results or success at the top level of the sport.
We face our Ten Haag, Di Matteo moment - a poor coach happening upon a cup. We can make the same mistake or go and get a proper coach in. Or continue the year and a half of absolutely garbage and our worst finish in forever.
Di Matteo masterminded his club to their first ever CL title against Barcelona and Bayern Munich after masterminding an FA cup win + also got them up the league. By the reasons people give to keep Ange he’s a genius. That achievement dwarves Ange’s.
Di Matteo won the champ lge. I’ll take that.Good luck getting someone in 10 games into the season and not giving him a preseason.
That's way too risky. Chelsea did the same with Di Matteo and they had to get Benitez in for the rest of the season.
I was hearing the same thing people talking about how it can negatively impact the dressing room. It was the only decent argument I heard to keep him.
But they're professional fucking footballers, they'll get over it.
I think the squad being behind him still is the real driving factor in keeping him tbh.
Also, like I said, sacking a man who just won the club a major European trophy would make the club look ridiculous and small time.
If he starts the season and continues the shit form in the league everyone will think the sacking is justified, regardless of the trophy being won.
Nothing like Ten Hag.
Ten Hag left them saddled with old, high wage donkeys they still can’t shift.
This squad isn’t being built for Ange and there are good v pieces whoever the coach is.
There were probably a load of better options for United to choose from than we have right now. Xavi is probably the only one on our list who could go into that squad and look them in the eye now. You can’t send any of the PL targets into that squad now.
And let’s be real here, United got much worse AFTET sacking Ten Hag so that narrative is pretty much dead anyway.
Ange with his first choice defence is top 4 PPG. If you recruit the depth at CB so we aren’t so fragile when we lose them, it’s not like that wouldn’t benefit the next coach if you end up sacking him anyway.
I like Frank but you can't sack Ange for him now, just sends out all the wrong kind of messages to the players and from the club...Glasner is the guy you go and get if you're going down that route.
Someone like Romero isn't sticking around for Thomas Frank, let's be real.
Go big or go home, if we're gonna move onto the next chapter then you're gonna have to go with a manager with something substantial behind him.
I think the squad being behind him still is the real driving factor in keeping him tbh.
Also, like I said, sacking a man who just won the club a major European trophy would make the club look ridiculous and small time.
If he starts the season and continues the shit form in the league everyone will think the sacking is justified, regardless of the trophy being won.
Loads like Ten Haag.
They got worse due to a wrong choice, Ten Haag still isn’t a good coach and they weren’t improving as a team. A cup win doesn’t equate to coaching progress is the whole point.
Oh no not the first choice defence top 4 PPG argument. Meaningless. Small limited sample size.
We are going to continue to be shit under this guy because the coaching sucks. We played utter shite football in that final. Imagine this guy trying to deal with CL mid-week and league, he couldn’t handle Europa League with league games FFS.
Romero doesn’t give a shit about Glasner either. We just won the biggest thing Glasner ever won.
So Amorim was the wrong coach?
How you know we wouldn’t choose the wrong coach?
The sample size is big enough with the first choice defense now tbh. As big as you will get to analyze at this level
thats true! but when you watch other sides as a neutral its different aint it.
watched a few videos on frank now though and hes defo far more of a football scientist than what we have now so thats straight away a big upgrade.
Glasner won it with like a quarter of the budget and then won an FA cup against numerous better teams than we beat in the EL with Crystal Palace btw.
And his team didn’t tank a league. And he schooled Ange home and away.
Loads like Ten Haag.
They got worse due to a wrong choice, Ten Haag still isn’t a good coach and they weren’t improving as a team. A cup win doesn’t equate to coaching progress is the whole point.
Oh no not the first choice defence top 4 PPG argument. Meaningless. Small limited sample size.
We are going to continue to be shit under this guy because the coaching sucks. We played utter shite football in that final. Imagine this guy trying to deal with CL mid-week and league, he couldn’t handle Europa League with league games FFS.