The we shall agree to disagree. No one can convince me of this mythical quality that so many are talking about. What I see is a longstanding lack of technical ability and athleticism...and only in the rare situation do they reside in the same player...and that's before even going into footballing IQ. Whether or not we could have played more attractive football is another matter. but that's jsut my opinion. But I would ask you when was the last time you saw any of these players play attractive football?Honestly dont really agree here.
Despite how bad things look now I think Mourinho had more than enough quality in the squad to play good and even successful football.
What was exposed was his lack of ability in the now, his methods and tactics not working, not a lack of quality at his disposal.
Sure. The exact way recruitment should work.Its clear Conte likes to buy players to suit him, cant argue with that - but he has just won the league for the first time in a decade for Inter - with a geriatric Ashley Young and Victor bloody Moses as wing backs - suggests to me he needs a certain skillset in a player rather than just expensive players.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I was only referring to Mou as a chequebook manager. for me spending big is not the same as being a chequebook manager. Pep spends but everyone can see his imprint. Mou needs to spend to cover his flaws.Edit: Incidentally, reading up on his successful seasons etc, Moses is a nice example of him developing players to suit him as well. Also the like of Lukaku actually starting to fullfil potential under him - Im not sure its entirely fair to just call him a chequebook manager ala Mourinho