wish I had 2 cocks..I hear you love a cockatoo.
Think that's what I heard anyway
could you just imagine
:carrollwtf:
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
wish I had 2 cocks..I hear you love a cockatoo.
Think that's what I heard anyway
Yes, they played like cloggers for 90 minsTo be fair QPR are pretty fucking shit. They just stuck 10 men behind the ball and hoped to hold on. It worked.
How did a thread where the subject is basically that our team have been given an award for being the best (comparatively) over a six game period become so negative?
Ha ha get him Tommy!
Buried.
Two posters of certain disrepute I'd say
limited in talent
in the same way that you have a brain but are apparently limited in intelligence, wit or cogent thought
In which he in no way insulted you, yet you decided to reply back in a derogatory manner.BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA they have one of the largest squads in the league with tons of experience... limited squad... hahaha
I mean the tone of it..one who left cos of posters like you
please behave
Really - do you seriously think that his response wasn't a derogatory one?The problem is Tommy, the evidence is to the contrary. The post below:
was directed at Kalyl's post:
In which he in no way insulted you, yet you decided to reply back in a derogatory manner.
You may be a decent fella, but posts like these don't help. Was Kalyl sarcastic? yes. But he wasn't insulting.
Really - do you seriously think that his response wasn't a derogatory one?
I saw it as exactly that - because there was no need to reply in that manner, if he wanted a debate or to discuss. It was a needless and insulting put down, which is why he got the reply he did.
He made no attempt to explain or apologise, and to be honest - it was yet another condescing or derogatory response, after others from the same poster. I'm not in the business of issuing amnesties after every incident. If people want to be pleasant to me - thats exactly what they get back, he could have argued with my post, or asked me to explain - and then systematically unravelled and destroyed my POV, if his argument held water - and I would have accepted it.
Same goes for everyone, you are not getting any grief, bad manners or insults, because you are treating it as a discussion. I understand the point you are making, and to a greater or lesser degree I have no argument - but I remain unrepentant with certain posters, because when I am given no quarter or am given undeserved crap, then I believe I am at liberty to return fire.
That makes perfect sense. The main problem that I see is that (almost) all you do on this site is argue. Crack a joke once in a while. Carl is pretty funny when he wants to be, just have a laff m8.If thats aimed at me - I'll say to you what I say to everyone who has a crack at me - or gives me shit for no reason, if you start on me - I will respond in kind.
If you (or anyone) talk(s) civilly to me - you will get polite and considerate responses.
Instead of pointing the finger at me - why not give the people who posted carping responses or remarks about me some friendly advice?
I am an unfailingly polite person - but I will defend myself, and stand up for myself if I am treated unfairly - or spoken to poorly.
(This isn't necessarily true in all cases, as there are some posters who deserve nothing - or have "previous.")
Fair enough, I can see that side of it. Personally, I don't feel he was meaning to be condescending, but rather just putting up the usual sarcastic response that most of my generation (including myself at times) use. I don't think it was a personal remark.
In my opinion, you seem to be an intelligent person, who can certainly put across his opinion and view on a debate in an eloquent and more friendly manner. Instead of biting back with a sharp remark, why not take the high road and explain your view? You may think that the person your responding to isn't worth the time, but perhaps if you show that person that you are prepared to be the bigger man, and want to enter into a free, open and intelligent debate on a subject, then that person then may respond in kind? If after trying this tact you feel people are still being derogatory, then simply exit the debate with them, until you meet someone your more happy to discuss with.
It would be boring if we all agreed on everything on here, but we can certainly chat about various subjects in an adult manner without it resorting to name calling.
You see the arguments, but forget the non volatile posts as they are less memorable.That makes perfect sense. The main problem that I see is that (almost) all you do on this site is argue. Crack a joke once in a while. Carl is pretty funny when he wants to be, just have a laff m8.
I just don't get why people have to use a put down as way of expressing a point, why not just explain why they disagree?
Brum for me - hate Leeds
Why the fuck would you hate Leeds?
You are 11,000 miles from Leeds, you have probably never been to Leeds in your life, or even met a Leeds supporter - who wasn't as plastic a fan as you are.
You know nothing about THFC apart from what you have read on Wikipedia and as you have never attended a game or experienced opposition fans, you have absolutely no reason to "hate" any other team, in Britain or anywhere else.
Unless you have a lithp and it cometh out as Leedth every time you try to thay it.
You have to know who he is as a poster to understand why.
Tommy, do you live in Bermuda by any chance? And what is your opinion on sky diving?