100%, would not mourn their passing one bit. It would be as if a flea flew into a fly trap and passed. Not a single fuck given.If Chelsea ceased to exist next season, I honestly would celebrate like Spurs won a trophy
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
100%, would not mourn their passing one bit. It would be as if a flea flew into a fly trap and passed. Not a single fuck given.If Chelsea ceased to exist next season, I honestly would celebrate like Spurs won a trophy
Yeah I know that but simply to put them cunts in a good position.What’s the reason he is supposed to gain nothing from any sale.
I read the proceeds from the sale go to charity, obviously these proceeds will be the figure after RA gets his loan paid back.
No way are Chelsea going bust, some backhand deal will be done and he will get his money, probably held in an account of some Tory fuck who knows Boris.
Rules don’t apply to rich people.
I've a horrible feeling that RA is deliberately trying to stop this sale so that the Ratcliffe sale can go through.
Yeah I would think that’s quite likely. The Times broke Ratcliffe’s bid and they were the ones to break This loan story. It’s not inconceivable that they’ve both come from the same source.
If Ratcliffe is in the market for a club and one in London then I’ve got an idea of one that might appeal to him…
Ratcliffe already owns OGC Nice in the French league. He bought them like 2 years ago. So him moving for another club already seems out of the blue.Yeah I would think that’s quite likely. The Times broke Ratcliffe’s bid and they were the ones to break This loan story. It’s not inconceivable that they’ve both come from the same source.
If Ratcliffe is in the market for a club and one in London then I’ve got an idea of one that might appeal to him…
Again though why would Abramovich change it to him if he is getting no money from the sale unless Ratcliffe has offered to pay into his ‘’charity fund’’ which would lead to a direct conflict with the U.K. govt.
I’m not talking about Abramovich, I’m saying that leaking news of Abramovich wanting the loan back could be tactic by someone to try and get the winning boehly bid to fall over. Putting this news out in public creates unnecessary uncertainty while the sale is going through. Ratcliffe seems to have been lobbying government and Chelsea if you believe the reports. It sounds like his bid is not going away either. Something doesn’t smell right does it?
To me something smells very dodgy, like someone wants to pocket the money. Also if Abramovich is a stooge of Putin or at least fears him why would he let Chelsea go for free, I just can’t see Putin turning down an opportunity to fuck the U.K. no matter how small.
"Innocent party"
Roman Abramovich and Chelsea FC : Sanctions
39 minutes ago, Ham said: I cannot believe that nobody, not HMG or the media, have ever heard of escrow. Incredible. It's his mone...forums.cfcnet.co.uk
Roman Abramovich and Chelsea FC : Sanctions
39 minutes ago, Ham said: I cannot believe that nobody, not HMG or the media, have ever heard of escrow. Incredible. It's his mone...forums.cfcnet.co.uk