In the league he’s played 400 minutes more than Son (who’s hardly in form) and 600 minutes more than Maddison and still has less goal/assists than them.
He’s even got less g/a per minute than Johnson and Solanke.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
There are far worse problems than him in this squad , he's a decent player at times , but he's been massively over hyped by our bone headed fanbase
In the league he’s played 400 minutes more than Son (who’s hardly in form) and 600 minutes more than Maddison and still has less goal/assists than them.
He’s even got less g/a per minute than Johnson and Solanke.
In the league he’s played 400 minutes more than Son (who’s hardly in form) and 600 minutes more than Maddison and still has less goal/assists than them.
He’s even got less g/a per minute than Johnson and Solanke.
Why would that be a surprise? Those are very end product focused player (Maddison being a big set piece taker) vs a player who picks it up from deep and does a lot of good facilitating work.
I don't particularly rate kulu (again, hugely flawed) but comparing his g/a record to a Johnson is madness. One practically goalhangs for fuck sake.
Bullshit. Wherever Kulusevski plays (and most of his minutes have been as an inverted forward, he does very little transitional stuff in deep/middle areas, and fuckloads less than Maddison who’s played every minute as a midfielder.
In the league he’s played 400 minutes more than Son (who’s hardly in form) and 600 minutes more than Maddison and still has less goal/assists than them.
He’s even got less g/a per minute than Johnson and Solanke.
Erm .. bullshit, except its fact. Maddison takes our set pieces and is better at final third stuff than Kulusevski. He's also a complete fucking lightweight who you will often not even notice existing in games if he isn't scoring or assisting. Kulusevski loses the ball too much but he will drive it forward and be noticeable.
Maddison for me is the better player but you're judging two very different players stylistically on production only, which is only one part of the role they play.
Too many players hung out to dry and expected to work miracles in a congested space. Kulu could be really Good but gets no coaching as far as I can see, apart from try harder. With Conte he was just allowed to roam around the RW but not really fast enough to play counter-attacking. Another of the Spurs-very-good-but-not-great players, I suspect - but never say never!
Maybe next season…
I think he's played on average 80 mins of gametime every 3.6 days. He's clearly knackered.He’s not played 90 mins twice a week every week for 3-4 months and even if he had, so fucking what? That’s what top players have to do. Or what supposedly top players can do. If he can’t he’s not a top player.
I was seeing people call him our debruyne just a few months ago
Insane