Gary 'the ears' Lineker is a prick - discuss

[Distaste for scouse]

Lets be honest, the left absolutely detest the general British demographic because they are not far left, and generally vote centre right.

Ethnic replacement is the only way the left gets a sniff of power. Of course that all looks far less ugly if they can virtue signal about refugees etc and colonial guilt etc.

The irony of it all is that second/third generation immigrants like Sunak and Braverman become very conservative.

I'm still wondering if we are ever going to see a female or ethnic leader in Labour's ranks.

They talk the talk but they never walk the walk.

 

[Guido 🇺🇦]

Most of them don't even understand the basic principles.
They don't understand the difference between an economic migrant and a genuine refugee.
They substitute logic for an entireley emotion driven argument. If idiots like Caroline Lucas had her way there would be millions flooding in.

You can't have a welfare state and an open door immigration policy. What do they think is going to happen?
Of course people in poor parts of the world want to come here for free healthcare, food, and a warm roof over their head.
All at taxpayer expense. There are no jobs for these people, most of them have no education and can't even speak English. We don't have the houses, capacity within the NHS or our schools or any other basic infrastructure to take them in.

But you dare make these most basic of observations and you get cunts like Lineker calling you a Nazi.

It's a joke how pathetic and childlike public discourse has become.

And now the truth

"millions want to come her". There are 281 million migrants globally. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2020-interactive/…
We took just 90,000
https://ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/yearendingjune2022…
That's 0.032%.

"Immigration would ruin our economy". Germany will take 1.2 million this year. https://schengenvisainfo.com/news/germany-expected-to-receive-1-2-million-migrants-by-the-end-of-2022… We will take about 90,000.
GDP per capita Germany: $51,203 UK: $46,510 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=GB

"Immigrants are a drain!" Immigrants from outside EU contribute 3% more than they cost, or £5.2 bn a year https://ucl.ac.uk/economics/about-department/fiscal-effects-immigration-uk…
Immigrants from inside the EU (prior to Brexit) contributed £26.9 bn a year https://oxfordeconomics.com/resource/the-fiscal-impact-of-immigration-on-the-uk/…
Total contribution: £31.1 bn a year

14% of UK population were born overseas https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migrants-in-the-uk-an-overview/…
28% of NHS doctors and nurses were born overseas. https://fullfact.org/health/foreign-born-nhs-eu/… You are twice as likely to be treated by an immigrant than lose your place in the queue to one.

"Immigrants steal our houses." Firstly, 14% of construction workers are immigrants https://citb.co.uk/media/cxxlqsps/citb-migration-and-uk-construction-report-2021.pdf…
So are 14% of the general population. So AT WORST, they're maintaining the level of housing-to-people we'd have anyway.

And secondly...In the 1960s the UK built a new home for every 14 head of population. By 2020 we were building 1 new home for every 43. If you or your kids can't get a home, it's because you or your kids elected a govt that doesn't build houses. https://independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/england-house-building-record-second-world-war-conservative-government-home-a8706776.html

"Immigrants get more benefits" Ummm nope. Legal immigrants are entitled to the same benefits as anyone else. Cos they're here legally, pay tax, so why shouldn't they? Illegal immigrants are entitled to absolutely nothing. https://fullfact.org/online/pensioners-illegal-immigrants-refugees-benefits/

The Government are literally licking their lips at this utter bullshit post because they've got you to blame its failures on people coming in on small boats. So instead of looking at the small boats and shouting at the wind, why not start looking at the REAL reasons you can't get housing, healthcare, your standard of living is falling, and everything seems shit. I'll give you a clue. It isn't Albania.

 

[Distaste for scouse]

And now the truth

"millions want to come her". There are 281 million migrants globally. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2020-interactive/…
We took just 90,000
https://ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/yearendingjune2022…
That's 0.032%.

"Immigration would ruin our economy". Germany will take 1.2 million this year. https://schengenvisainfo.com/news/germany-expected-to-receive-1-2-million-migrants-by-the-end-of-2022… We will take about 90,000.
GDP per capita Germany: $51,203 UK: $46,510 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=GB

"Immigrants are a drain!" Immigrants from outside EU contribute 3% more than they cost, or £5.2 bn a year https://ucl.ac.uk/economics/about-department/fiscal-effects-immigration-uk…
Immigrants from inside the EU (prior to Brexit) contributed £26.9 bn a year https://oxfordeconomics.com/resource/the-fiscal-impact-of-immigration-on-the-uk/…
Total contribution: £31.1 bn a year

14% of UK population were born overseas https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migrants-in-the-uk-an-overview/…
28% of NHS doctors and nurses were born overseas. https://fullfact.org/health/foreign-born-nhs-eu/… You are twice as likely to be treated by an immigrant than lose your place in the queue to one.

"Immigrants steal our houses." Firstly, 14% of construction workers are immigrants https://citb.co.uk/media/cxxlqsps/citb-migration-and-uk-construction-report-2021.pdf…
So are 14% of the general population. So AT WORST, they're maintaining the level of housing-to-people we'd have anyway.

And secondly...In the 1960s the UK built a new home for every 14 head of population. By 2020 we were building 1 new home for every 43. If you or your kids can't get a home, it's because you or your kids elected a govt that doesn't build houses. https://independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/england-house-building-record-second-world-war-conservative-government-home-a8706776.html

"Immigrants get more benefits" Ummm nope. Legal immigrants are entitled to the same benefits as anyone else. Cos they're here legally, pay tax, so why shouldn't they? Illegal immigrants are entitled to absolutely nothing. https://fullfact.org/online/pensioners-illegal-immigrants-refugees-benefits/

The Government are literally licking their lips at this utter bullshit post because they've got you to blame its failures on people coming in on small boats. So instead of looking at the small boats and shouting at the wind, why not start looking at the REAL reasons you can't get housing, healthcare, your standard of living is falling, and everything seems shit. I'll give you a clue. It isn't Albania.

Again like your buddy Spagbol you are talking about Legal immigration.
I'm talking about illegal immigration.
The topic of this thread is about Gary Linekers comments about the governments latest bill designed to....wait for it.....tackle illegal immigration.

Shall we say that again, illegal immigration.

You are again another one who either doesn't understand the distinction between a legal and an illegal immigrant is or is flat out being disengenious.

So you wasted all of that time posting for an argument I wasn't even making.

EDIT : In the last paragraph you do actually reference illegal immigrants with a claim that they get no benefits. .
That's the only paragraph you made referencing illegals so I'll actually answer it.

They may not technically be getting benefits, but all of the people coming here illegally in the small boats are being put in hotels, fed and given access to health care. This is very well documented.
This is costing the UK taxpayer some £6m per day.

I did see somewhere they were being given £40 per week but Its probably I politically biased source so I won't link it.

 

[Samisspurs]

Again like your buddy Spagbol you are talking about Legal immigration.
I'm talking about illegal immigration.
The topic of this thread is about Gary Linekers comments about the governments latest bill designed to....wait for it.....tackle illegal immigration.

Shall we say that again, illegal immigration.

You are again another one who either doesn't understand the distinction between a legal and an illegal immigrant is or is flat out being disengenious.

So you wasted all of that time posting for an argument I wasn't even making.

EDIT : In the last paragraph you do actually reference illegal immigrants with a claim that they get no benefits. .
That's the only paragraph you made referencing illegals so I'll actually answer it.

They may not technically be getting benefits, but all of the people coming here illegally in the small boats are being put in hotels, fed and given access to health care. This is very well documented.
This is costing the UK taxpayer some £6m per day.

I did see somewhere they were being given £40 per week but Its probably I politically biased source so I won't link it.

They don't believe in 'illegal immigration', its not a good look for them.

 

[Distaste for scouse]

They don't believe in 'illegal immigration', its not a good look for them.

It's like trying to argue with a wall, I bet they were all hollering "You get em Gary!" haven't not even bothered to read the bill in the first place.

 

[Samisspurs]

I'm still wondering if we are ever going to see a female or ethnic leader in Labour's ranks.

They talk the talk but they never walk the walk.

Labour has to appeal to that middle England demographic I mentioned. Dianne Abbot aint gonna lead them any time soon.

 

[cretinousgoat]

But you are a hypocrit my dude, because you expect me to play nicely and go out of your way to write a post asking me to be civil, but I don't see you calling them out when they are throwing terms like gammon around.
I don't see you defending the government when they are getting called Nazi's for daring to write a policy designed to tackle illegal immigration.

I think what's really happening here is you love to see it being dished out those you consider to be on the right but you can't take it when you get a little bit back at you.

1. No they are not getting called Nazis.

2. I think what’s really happening here is you love to see it being dished out to those you consider to be on the left but you can't take it when you get a little bit back at you.

3. Practice what you preach.

 

[Distaste for scouse]

Labour has to appeal to that middle England demographic I mentioned. Dianne Abbot aint gonna lead them any time soon.

Its just so absurd that they are arguing about legal migrants and what they put into the economy.
An example of a legal migrant could be Chad Thunderstroke from Texas who has come here with his wife and kids to work in banking or big tech.

Clearly we are not talking about that, we are talking about people coming over from non war zones most of them on small boats and on the backs of lorries who in the vast majority of cases have no trade, limited education and no English. therefore no real prospects and are going to be a drain on the taxpayer. Or they are going to go into the criminal underworld of people trafficking.

We aren't talking about Chad or Andrejz the plumber from Poland.

 

[Dr Rocktopus]

Labour has to appeal to that middle England demographic I mentioned. Dianne Abbot aint gonna lead them any time soon.

And what shade of brown is your shirt this evening?

 

[Samisspurs]

Its just so absurd that they are arguing about legal migrants and what they put into the economy.
An example of a legal migrant could be Chad Thunderstroke from Texas who has come here with his wife and kids to work in banking or big tech.

Clearly we are not talking about that, we are talking about people coming over from non war zones most of them on small boats and on the backs of lorries who in the vast majority of cases have no trade, limited education and no English. therefore no real prospects and are going to be a drain on the taxpayer. Or they are going to go into the criminal underworld of people trafficking.

We aren't talking about Chad or Andrejz the plumber from Poland.

Exactly, completely delusional and romanticised.

Like Lineker taking in a rocket scientist student from Turkey. Rather than a street gang from Albania. The denial is off the scale, just out of fear of being called racist by Tarquin and Tabitha.

 

[Samisspurs]

And what shade of brown is your shirt this evening?

No argument as usual, just slurs. Bye.

 

[Bill Madrid]

It's not really the same as the 3rd Reich because those people they were targeting were for the best part German, it had nothing to do with fleeing immigrants per se.

So I don't agree with Lineker's comparison.

For the thousandth time, he didn't say that the UK Government were the same or even similar to the Third Reich.

He said SOME of the LANGUAGE that SOME politicians were using was reminiscent of SOME of the LANGUAGE used in 1930s Germany.

He didn't call anyone a Nazi or compare them to Nazis. Surely you can see the difference?

 

[Dr Rocktopus]

No argument as usual, just slurs. Bye.

You don't have an argument. You just regurgitate the far-right press like a sap.

 

[Distaste for scouse]

For the thousandth time, he didn't say that the UK Government were the same or even similar to the Third Reich.

He said SOME of the LANGUAGE that SOME politicians were using was reminiscent of SOME of the LANGUAGE used in 1930s Germany.

He didn't call anyone a Nazi or compare them to Nazis. Surely you can see the difference?

Oh come on Bill....

Why say it at all then if not to plant a seed or draw a comparison.

Don't treat people like fools.

If I said fucking Corbyn's rhetoric was a bit Chairman Mao in nature its pretty obvious what I'm driving at, and what my intent is.

 

[Guido 🇺🇦]

Again like your buddy Spagbol you are talking about Legal immigration.
I'm talking about illegal immigration.
The topic of this thread is about Gary Linekers comments about the governments latest bill designed to....wait for it.....tackle illegal immigration.

Shall we say that again, illegal immigration.

You are again another one who either doesn't understand the distinction between a legal and an illegal immigrant is or is flat out being disengenious.

So you wasted all of that time posting for an argument I wasn't even making.

EDIT : In the last paragraph you do actually reference illegal immigrants with a claim that they get no benefits. .
That's the only paragraph you made referencing illegals so I'll actually answer it.

They may not technically be getting benefits, but all of the people coming here illegally in the small boats are being put in hotels, fed and given access to health care. This is very well documented.
This is costing the UK taxpayer some £6m per day.

I did see somewhere they were being given £40 per week but Its probably I politically biased source so I won't link it.

Then list the numbers mate. Stick to factual information. There are widely published numbers estimating how many there are in the UK but please, refrain from the bollocks in your initial post of telling us "Millions flooding in" because you can't prove this, at no point has this number even got close to being met and it bares no relation to the point you are saying you are trying to make - Illegal Immigration - illegal immigrants are only illegal once they are proved to be.

Do some actual maths. How many are in the UK? How long have they been here? When you have this number there are some obvious questions that should then begin to be formed, like why is it taking so long to process these people? What the fuck are the Government actually doing about it apart from inventing new laws to make more people Illegal?

Since 2010 UK immigration law has been "tightened" 168 times (average 1 new law per month).
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1010857/user-guide-policy-changes-jun21.ods…

43 laws on small boats alone https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/07/conservatives-channel-crossings-small-boats-tories-rwanda-deportation… If this stuff deterred people from coming to the UK illegally it would have deterred by now.

If "us", British citizens frightened by immigration, can't keep track of the 168 bits of legislation IN YOUR OWN LANGUAGE, how do you expect a Somali refugee too? And if they don't know the law, how on earth can they be deterred by it? It makes NO SENSE.

Even if they were to pass their outrageously illegal proposed policy all they would have achieved is make EVERYONE (who would have been legal + illegal) into an Illegal immigrant but crucially they would all be here. They will still be in the "hotels", still be fed still costing the taxpayers, but now in numbers that require hundreds of more hotels (maybe even thousands) to be manned with staff and food to feed them. It makes no sense.

Have the Government cut or increased Border Force jobs? They've cut them!!! Makes you wonder why they would do that when "their number one priority is immigration". Perhaps just maybe they know that this is where they are getting their votes from whilst polling at 25%? If only the people that are dangling on the end of their string asked what they have actually been doing for the past thirteen years for things to be so utterly fucked.

 

[r-u-s-x]

Then list the numbers mate. Stick to factual information. There are widely published numbers estimating how many there are in the UK but please, refrain from the bollocks in your initial post of telling us "Millions flooding in" because you can't prove this, at no point has this number even got close to being met and it bares no relation to the point you are saying you are trying to make - Illegal Immigration - illegal immigrants are only illegal once they are proved to be.

Do some actual maths. How many are in the UK? How long have they been here? When you have this number there are some obvious questions that should then begin to be formed, like why is it taking so long to process these people? What the fuck are the Government actually doing about it apart from inventing new laws to make more people Illegal?

Since 2010 UK immigration law has been "tightened" 168 times (average 1 new law per month).
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1010857/user-guide-policy-changes-jun21.ods…

43 laws on small boats alone https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/07/conservatives-channel-crossings-small-boats-tories-rwanda-deportation… If this stuff deterred people from coming to the UK illegally it would have deterred by now.

If "us", British citizens frightened by immigration, can't keep track of the 168 bits of legislation IN YOUR OWN LANGUAGE, how do you expect a Somali refugee too? And if they don't know the law, how on earth can they be deterred by it? It makes NO SENSE.

Even if they were to pass their outrageously illegal proposed policy all they would have achieved is make EVERYONE (who would have been legal + illegal) into an Illegal immigrant but crucially they would all be here. They will still be in the "hotels", still be fed still costing the taxpayers, but now in numbers that require hundreds of more hotels (maybe even thousands) to be manned with staff and food to feed them. It makes no sense.

Ll the Government cut or increased Border Force jobs? They've cut them!!! Makes you wonder why they would do that when "their number one priority is immigration". Perhaps just maybe they know that this is where they are getting their votes from whilst polling at 25%? If only the people that are dangling on the end of their string asked what they have actually been doing for the past thirteen years for things to be so utterly fucked.

Last point is why they love putting loud nasty incompetent people in as home Secretary. All the credit speaking big but none of the hassle of achieving anything

 

[SpaggyBoy]

Are you being disengenious or are you really this stupid?

You are talking about Legal immigration. Talking about refugee schemes and other legal means to enter the country and citing a load of facts and figures which while very nice I'm sure have nothing to do with what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about illegals. Maybe you haven't noticed but this is the thread about Gary Lineker and we are talking about Gary's drawing absurd comparisons about Nazi's to the latest government bill which is designed to target ILLEGAL immigrants and prevent them claiming asylum.

This is the bill that Caroline (drama queen) Lucas tore up.

It's not even controversial its designed to stop illegals coming here in small boats and on the backs of lorries. But like you, she clearly doesn't understand the basic distinctions.

You want to argue about Oranges and cite a load of statistics about oranges when I'm talking about Apples.

Incidentally its costing the UK some £6m per day to house and feed these illegal immigrants, and there are some 160,000 people who are here illegally currently seeking asylum. While their applications are being processed the taxpayer is paying for them.

If we were talking about taking in people legally seeking aslyum from to use an example Afghanistan, People that may have supported the US/UK and are therefore in danger. I don't have a problem with that.

What I do have a problem with is lefties who are so incredibly disengenious as to try and lump everything together into one catageory when it suits them to try and play little games.

Speaking of being disingenuous...

You do realise that there currently are no safe and legal routes into the UK. Surely you know that right? Here's Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary admitting it.

Suella Braverman fails to explain how theoretical asylum seeker could get to UK safely and legally

The home secretary was being questioned by MPs on immigration but could not say how asylum seekers could enter the UK legally, did not know how many judicial reviews have been launched against the Manston migrant centre and did not know if migrants could be forced to go to Rwanda.

news.sky.com

So...

Next time you bang on about illegal immigration and how it's somehow different to asylum seeking, please bear that in mind and do some research before you embarrass yourself again.

 

[Bazali]

I'm still wondering if we are ever going to see a female or ethnic leader in Labour's ranks.

They talk the talk but they never walk the walk.

Neil Kinnock doesn’t count!

 

[lovinit]

• Socialism as the final concept of duty, the ethical duty of work, not just for oneself but also for one's fellow man's sake, and above all the principle: Common good before own good, a struggle against all parasitism and especially against easy and unearned income. And we were aware that in this fight we can rely on no one but our own people. We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that socialism is inseparable from nationalism.
  • "Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Speech also known as "Why Are We Anti-Semites?" Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. [1]
• Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism... How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!
  • "Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. [2]
• Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge.
  • "Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. [3]

1921​

• Everyone was at one time a Social Democrat.
  • As quoted in Hitler: Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen 1905-1924, Eberhard Jäckel and Axel Kuhn, (editors) Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1980, p. 448 (quote from 1921)

1922​

• The Jews have shown real genius in profiting by politics. This capitalistic people, which was brought into existence by the unscrupulous exploitation of men, has understood how to get the leadership of the Fourth Estate into its own hands; and by acting both on the Right and on the Left it has its apostles in both camps. On the Right the Jew does his best to encourage all the evils there are to such an extent that the man of the people, poor devil, will be exasperated as much as possible— greed of money, unscrupulousness, hard- heartedness, abominable snobbishness. More and more Jews have wormed their way into our upper-class families; and the consequence has been that the ruling class has been alienated from its own people.
  • As quoted in A History of National Socialism, Konrad Heiden, Methuen & Company, LTD, London: UK, 1934, p. 58. Speech in April, 1922
• There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction - to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power - that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago. Here, too, there can be no compromise - there are only two possibilities: either victory of the Aryan, or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew.
  ..
  And if we ask who was responsible for our misfortune, then we must inquire who profited by our collapse. And the answer to that question is that 'Banks and Stock Exchanges are more flourishing than ever before.' We were told that capitalism would be destroyed, and when we ventured to remind one or the other of these famous statesmen and said 'Don't forget that Jews too have capital,' then the answer was: 'What are you worrying about? Capitalism as a whole will now be destroyed, the whole people will now be free. We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism, we are fighting very capitalism: we are making the people completely free.' ... It is only the international Stock Exchange and loan- capital, the so-called 'supra-state capital,' which has profited from the collapse of our economic life, the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation which is itself national to the core, which fancies itself to be above all other nations, which places itself above other nations and which already rules over them. The international Stock Exchange capital would be unthinkable, it would never have come, without its founders the supra-national, because intensely national, Jews.
  ..
  We must on principle free ourselves from any class standpoint.
  ..
  'NATIONAL' AND 'SOCIAL' ARE TWO IDENTICAL CONCEPTIONS. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory.
  ..
  I am perhaps more capable than anyone else of understanding and realizing the nature and the whole life of the various German castes.
  ..
  THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS CLASSES: THEY CANNOT BE. Class means caste and caste means race. If there are castes in India, well and good; there it is possible, for there there were formerly Aryans and dark aborigines. So it was in Egypt and in Rome. But with us in Germany where everyone who is a German at all has the same blood, has the same eyes, and speaks the same language, here there can be no class, here there can be only a single people and beyond that nothing else.
  ..
  At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it "National Socialist.' We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, even to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the state and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it.
  • Munich - Speech of April 12, 1922
• Once I really am in power, my first and foremost task will be the annihilation of the Jews. As soon as I have the power to do so, I will have gallows built in rows—at the Marienplatz in Munich, for example—as many as traffic allows. Then the Jews will be hanged indiscriminately, and they will remain hanging until they stink; they will hang there as long as the principles of hygiene permit. As soon as they have been untied, the next batch will be strung up, and so on down the line, until the last Jew in Munich has been exterminated. Other cities will follow suit, precisely in this fashion, until all Germany has been completely cleansed of Jews.
  • Statement to Josef Heil, 1922 quoted in Gerald Fleming, Hitler and the Final Solution pg. 17

1923​

• The Treaty of Versailles and the Treaty of St Germain are kept alive by Bolshevism in Germany. The Peace Treaty and Bolshevism are two heads of one monster. We must decapitate both.
  ..
  In my scheme of the German state, there will be no room for the alien, no use for the wastrel, for the usurer or speculator, or anyone incapable of productive work.
  ..
  Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.
  • Interview with George Sylvester Viereck, 1923
• Wenn deine Mutter alt geworden,
  und älter du geworden bist,
  wenn ihr, was früher leicht und mühlos,
  nunmehr zur Last geworden ist,
  wenn ihre lieben, treuen Augen,
  nicht mehr wie einst ins Leben seh'n,
  wenn ihre Füße, kraftgebrochen,
  sie nicht mehr tragen woll'n mein Geh'n,
  dann reich ihr deinen Arm zur Stütze,
  geleite sie mit froher Lust,
  die Stunde kommt, da du sie weinend
  zum letzten Gang begleiten musst.
  Und fragt sie dich, so gib ihr Antwort,
  und fragt sie wieder, - sprich auch du,
  und fragt sie nochmals, - steh' ihr Rede,
  nicht ungestüm, in sanfter Ruh!
  Und kann sie dich nicht recht verstehen,
  erklär ihr alles frohbewegt,
  die Stunde kommt, die bitt're Stunde,
  da dich ihr Mund nach nichts mehr frägt.
  • When your mother has grown old
    and with her so have you,
    When that which once came easy
    has at last become a burden,
    When her loving, true eyes
    no longer see life as once they did
    When her weary feet
    no longer want to wear her as she stands,
    then reach an arm to her shoulder,
    escort her gently, with happiness and passion
    The hour will come, when you, crying,
    must take her on her final walk.
    And if she asks you, then give her an answer
    And if she asks you again, listen!
    And if she asks you again, take in her words
    not impetuously, but gently and in peace!
    And if she cannot quite understand you,
    explain all to her gladly
    For the hour will come, the bitter hour
    when her mouth will ask for nothing more.
  • Adolf Hitler, "Denk' es!" (Be Reminded!) 1923, first published in Sonntag-Morgenpost (14 May 1933).

1924​

• I alone bear the responsibility. But I am not a criminal because of that. If today I stand here as a revolutionary, it is as a revolutionary against the revolution. There is no such thing as high treason against the traitors of 1918.
  • At his trial, 24 February 1924

1926​

• If the National Socialist Movement should fail to understand the fundamental importance of this essential principle [race], if it should merely varnish the external appearance of the present State and adopt the majority principle, it would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground.
  • Mein Kampf, Volume 2, Chapter IV, "Personality and the Ideal of the People's State," Trans. Marco Roberto, MVR, 2015, p. 33, first published 1926
• t is absolutely wrong to infer any ideal sense of sacrifice in the Jews from the fact that they stand together in struggle, or, better expressed, in the plundering of their fellow men.
  
  • Mein Kampf, as quoted in Anthropology as Ethics: Nondualism and the Conduct of Sacrifice (2009), by T. M. S. Evens, p. 320
  [*]As long as the Jew has not succeeded in mastering other peoples he is forced to speak their language whether he likes it or not. But the moment that the world would become the slave of the Jew it would have to learn some other language so that by this means the Jew could dominate all the more easily.
  
  • Mein Kampf, Chapter "Nation and Race"
  [*]Even today I am not ashamed to say that, overpowered by stormy enthusiasm, I fell down on my knees and thanked Heaven from an overflowing heart for granting me the good fortune of being permitted to live at this time..
  
  • Mein Kampf, Chapter "The World War"

1927​

• We reject the political aims of the industrialists.
  • Speech at the May 1927 NSDAP provincial congress in Stuttgart, quoted in Dietrich Orlow, The Nazi Party 1919-1945: A Complete History, Enigma Books (2010), p. 61

1928​

• I believe that I have enough energy to lead our people whither it must shed its blood [zum blutigen Einsatz], not for an adjustment of its boundaries, but to save it into the most distant future by securing so much land and space that the future will receive back many times the blood shed.
  • Speech (23 May 1928), quoted in Gerhard L. Weinberg, 'The world through Hitler's eyes', in Germany, Hitler, and World War II: Essays in Modern German and World History (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 51

Zweites Buch (1928)​

Online at the Internet Archive

• I am a German nationalist. This means that I proclaim my nationality. My whole thought and action belongs to it. I am a socialist. I see no class and no social estate before me, but that community of the Folk, made up of people who are linked by blood, united by a language, and subject to a same general fate. I love this Folk and hate only its majority of the moment, because I view the latter to be just as little representative of the greatness of my Folk as it is of its happiness.
• The National Socialist Movement, on the contrary, will always let its foreign policy be determined by the necessity to secure the space necessary to the life of our Folk. It knows no Germanising or Teutonising, as in the case of the national bourgeoisie, but only the spread of its own Folk. It will never see in the subjugated, so called Germanised, Czechs or Poles a national, let alone Folkish, strengthening, but only the racial weakening of our Folk.
• The Folkish State, conversely, must under no conditions annex Poles with the intention of wanting to make Germans out of them some day. On the contrary, it must muster the determination either to seal off these alien racial elements, so that the blood of its own Folk will not be corrupted again, or it must without further ado remove them and hand over the vacated territory to its own National Comrades.
• Jewry is a Folk with a racial core that is not wholly unitary. Nevertheless, as a Folk, it has special intrinsic characteristics which separate it from all other Folks living on the globe. Jewry is not a religious community, but the religious bond between Jews; rather is in reality the momentary governmental system of the Jewish Folk. The Jew has never had a territorially bounded State of his own in the manner of Aryan States. Nevertheless, his religious community is a real State, since it guarantees the preservation, the increase and the future of the Jewish Folk. But this is solely the task of the State. That the Jewish State is subject to no territorial limitation, as is the case with Aryan States, is connected with the character of the Jewish Folk, which is lacking in the productive forces for the construction and preservation of its own territorial State.
• Because of the lack of productive capacities of its own, the Jewish Folk cannot carry out the construction of a State, viewed in a territorial sense, but as a support of its own existence it needs the work and creative activities of other nations. Thus the existence of the Jew himself becomes a parasitical one within the lives of other Folks. Hence the ultimate goal of the Jewish struggle for existence is the enslavement of productively active Folks. In order to achieve this goal, which in reality has represented Jewry's struggle for existence at all times, the Jew makes use of all weapons that are in keeping with the whole complex of his character. Therefore in domestic politics within the individual nations he fights first for equal rights and later for superior rights. The characteristics of cunning, intelligence, astuteness, knavery, dissimulation, and so on, rooted in the character of his Folkdom, serve him as weapons thereto. They are as much stratagems in his war of survival as those of other Folks in combat. In foreign policy, he tries to bring nations into a state of unrest, to divert them from their true interests, and to plunge them into reciprocal wars, and in this way gradually rise to mastery over them with the help of the power of money and propaganda. His ultimate goal is the denationalisation, the promiscuous bastardisation of other Folks, the lowering of the racial levy of the highest Folks, as well as the domination of this racial mishmash through the extirpation of the Folkish intelligentsia and its replacement by the members of his own Folk.
• National Socialism derives from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.
  • Interview by Hanns Johst in Frankforter Volksblatt (January 27, 1934), quoted in David Schoenbaum, Hitler's Social Revolution: Class and Status in Nazi Germany, 1933–1939 (New York: NY, W. W. Norton & Company, 1997), p. 57
• If we want a strong Germany, you must one day be strong, too. If we want a powerful Germany, you, too, must one day be powerful. If we want an honorable Germany, you must one day uphold this honor. If we want order in Germany, you must maintain this order. If we want to once again create a loyal Germany, you yourselves must learn to be loyal. You are the Germany of the future, and thus we want you to be what this Germany of the future must and will be.
  • Speech at a youth rally in Berlin, 1 May 1934
• The hammer will once more become the symbol of the German worker and the sickle the sign of the German peasant,...
  • May Day Speech at Tempelhof Air Field, Berlin (1 May 1934), Adolf Hitler: Collection of Speeches 1922-1945, ReichsMilitariaCom; 1st edition (2016), p. 184
• We have a great aim before us; a mighty work of reform of ourselves and our lives, of our life in common, of our economy, of our culture. This work does not disturb the rest of the world. We have enough to do in our own house.
  • Speech in Gera (17 June 1934), quoted in The Times (26 September 1939), p. 9
• Mutinies are crushed in accordance with eternal and unchanging iron laws.
  • Speech in the Reichstag (13 July 1934) on the Night of the Long Knives, quoted in Stephen H. Roberts, The House That Hitler Built (1945), p. 115
• Es wird stets nur ein Teil eines Volkes aus wirklich aktiven Kämpfern bestehen, und von ihnen wird mehr gefordert, als von den Millionen der übrigen Volksgenossen. Für sie genügt nicht die blosse Ablegung des Bekenntnisses: «Ich glaube»; sondern der Schwur: «Ich kämpfe!»
  • It shall always be only a fraction of the people who stand out as truly active fighters, and more is expected from them than from the millions of their fellow countrymen. For them, the mere pledge of "I believe" is not enough, but rather the oath: "I fight!"
    • Speech from the Sixth Nazi Party Congress, Nuremberg (September 8th, 1934) [5].
      Video footage of this quotation can be found in the film Triumph of the Will

Leftists on here getting triggered by Hitler's "I am a socialist" rhetoric

Why am I getting Star Wars vibes?

 

[SpaggyBoy]

Fucking hell...

Not another stupid, historically illiterate twat. I'd thought we'd seen the last of this utter bollocks.