Ok, I'm curious to get some views on this and hopefully the question I'm raising won't offend anyone.
Some will remember the saga of Liverpudlian Ken Bigley and how the people of Liverpool were disgusted over the lack of attempts by the Blair government to try and negotiate his release when he was abducted by Al-Qaeda in Iraq. He was subsequently killed and the city of Liverpool went into overdrive with it's mourning. The level of grief being exhibited by the Liverpudlians famously lead a certain man named Boris to suggest that Liverpudlians sometimes revelled a little toomuch in their own self pity, for which he was marched up there to apologise.
Anyhow, I was just reading that at the forthcoming meeting of Man U and the Dippers there will be a tribute to Hillsborough before the game, inclouding the usual rendition of You'll Never Walk Alone, minutes silence and a ceremony involving Gerrard and others releasing 96 balloons. This is in addition to tributes at countless clubs during this past weekend's fixtures, mainly recognised with a YNWA rendition. This, however, does not acknowledge the anniversary, but rather is to commemorate the latest report on the disaster.
Now, these tributes aren't the only tributes to Hillsborough as people know. Each FA Cup semi-final there is a minute's silence. Each year at the anniversary weekend most clubs do a minute silence, with Liverpool usually doing some sort of ceremony. When it is a big anniversary such as 10 or 20 years, the tributes have been even more. THere's always a massive tribute display outside Anfield and so on. My question therefore is, when does this all become too much? When does a justified memorial cease to be just that and start fueling this notion that Liverpudlians love to wollow in their own misery?
Don't get me wrong, I cheer for the latest report and very much hope the Police will be fully investigated and there be prosecutions where appropriate. But, at the same time, I was reading the BBC News website earlier this week and the families were on TV and, just for a minute, the thought that I was sick of seeing and hearing about it crossed my mind. The result of that was a feeling of guilt that I didn't much like, and I know this wasn't the fault of the families who would like justice. But, as tradegies like 9/11 and 7/7 gradually fade into history I felt a resentment that I was being reminded of Hillsborough all of the time, as if Liverpool couldn't let go and therefore the restof us need to be reminded on a regular basis. Was that feeling justified? I don't know - which is why I felt guiilty afterwards. Having thought about it, all I could put it down to was that I had been oversaturating with tributes over the years that I had become tired of it all. That lead me onto the question above. So, is the questuion legitimate? Is there a danger that too much can fuel this idea of Liverpudlian victim status?
TLDR, yadda, yadda, yadda....
Some will remember the saga of Liverpudlian Ken Bigley and how the people of Liverpool were disgusted over the lack of attempts by the Blair government to try and negotiate his release when he was abducted by Al-Qaeda in Iraq. He was subsequently killed and the city of Liverpool went into overdrive with it's mourning. The level of grief being exhibited by the Liverpudlians famously lead a certain man named Boris to suggest that Liverpudlians sometimes revelled a little toomuch in their own self pity, for which he was marched up there to apologise.
Anyhow, I was just reading that at the forthcoming meeting of Man U and the Dippers there will be a tribute to Hillsborough before the game, inclouding the usual rendition of You'll Never Walk Alone, minutes silence and a ceremony involving Gerrard and others releasing 96 balloons. This is in addition to tributes at countless clubs during this past weekend's fixtures, mainly recognised with a YNWA rendition. This, however, does not acknowledge the anniversary, but rather is to commemorate the latest report on the disaster.
Now, these tributes aren't the only tributes to Hillsborough as people know. Each FA Cup semi-final there is a minute's silence. Each year at the anniversary weekend most clubs do a minute silence, with Liverpool usually doing some sort of ceremony. When it is a big anniversary such as 10 or 20 years, the tributes have been even more. THere's always a massive tribute display outside Anfield and so on. My question therefore is, when does this all become too much? When does a justified memorial cease to be just that and start fueling this notion that Liverpudlians love to wollow in their own misery?
Don't get me wrong, I cheer for the latest report and very much hope the Police will be fully investigated and there be prosecutions where appropriate. But, at the same time, I was reading the BBC News website earlier this week and the families were on TV and, just for a minute, the thought that I was sick of seeing and hearing about it crossed my mind. The result of that was a feeling of guilt that I didn't much like, and I know this wasn't the fault of the families who would like justice. But, as tradegies like 9/11 and 7/7 gradually fade into history I felt a resentment that I was being reminded of Hillsborough all of the time, as if Liverpool couldn't let go and therefore the restof us need to be reminded on a regular basis. Was that feeling justified? I don't know - which is why I felt guiilty afterwards. Having thought about it, all I could put it down to was that I had been oversaturating with tributes over the years that I had become tired of it all. That lead me onto the question above. So, is the questuion legitimate? Is there a danger that too much can fuel this idea of Liverpudlian victim status?
TLDR, yadda, yadda, yadda....