What if what we’re seeing now, with Kane and Son leading the line (and the rest of the Premier League for that matter) in a free-flowing attacking style of football, is the new Mourinho?
Read article
Read article
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I agree with everything you said, though at Madrid Jose signed Ozil, Di María and Khedira - 22, 22 and 23 year-old at the time, respectively - and they all played a huge part in his team. He also played one of Marcelo or Coentrão - both 22 at the time - in every match. He played Ramos as a CB - which completely changed his career, not to mention Madrid´s History -, when he was just 23. And of course, he was the one who brought Varane to the team - when he was 19!Anyone with a brain can see that Mourinho adapts his style to the club and the players he has at his disposal. He played turgid football at Man U because they had a shite team.
At Real Madrid, Chelsea and maybe Inter he didnt have time to bed in young players. he was most likely out the door after a year or 2.
Our club is different. We are not as wealthy, but we are more patient. We allow a manager to build. And we dont have the resources to buy the ready made player all the time.
We were also a potent attacking force before he set foot through the door. All we needed was a defence.
The older I get the more frustrated I am listening to Sky, Talksport or any red top/broadsheet. All they do is wind fanbases up to sell their subscriptions/Newspapers/Adverts. They bounce from sensationalist praise to ugly controversy game after game with no middle ground.
Exactly. There are many ways to win - and to play well - in football. There will always be room for different styles, and that´s the beauty of it - I think it´s a tremendous lack of imagination to think otherwise.Does it really matter if a coach is modern or not? What is modern now will be obsolete next year
What really ,matters to me:
- Watching Spurs and feeling pleasure and excitement
- Winning games while doing that
My perception fo Mou is that we had a phase 1 which started when he took over and ended at half time against Southampton. A period when we have done well in terms of points, but with many doubts and many dull performances (not all of them definitely)
Then Phase 2 started, and I can see a lot of good stuff, power, dominance, confidence, depth and still lot of margin for improvement, this feeling that we are already doing some amazing stuff (again, not always), and we have barely scratched the surface of what we can do. I am seeing what matters to me
Someone who play "attractive" football even if they never won anythingWhat's a "modern" coach?
What's a "modern" coach?
Pep G one time? Even so That passed quickly thoughWhat's a "modern" coach?
Anyone with a brain can see that Mourinho adapts his style to the club and the players he has at his disposal. He played turgid football at Man U because they had a shite team.
At Real Madrid, Chelsea and maybe Inter he didnt have time to bed in young players. he was most likely out the door after a year or 2.
Our club is different. We are not as wealthy, but we are more patient. We allow a manager to build. And we dont have the resources to buy the ready made player all the time.
We were also a potent attacking force before he set foot through the door. All we needed was a defence.
The older I get the more frustrated I am listening to Sky, Talksport or any red top/broadsheet. All they do is wind fanbases up to sell their subscriptions/Newspapers/Adverts. They bounce from sensationalist praise to ugly controversy game after game with no middle ground.
I hate all this bollox about modern coaches and that fucking cringe word you hear all the time "progressive"
Fuck off.
There is nothing new in football, it's all been tried before.
The only difference is that the athleticism has significantly increased.
I never understood it when people panned sides that utilized a long ball, if it works who gives a fuck. We might prefer a more attractive on the eye game, but it's all about getting results.