Please, if you want to talk to me, stop with pretentiousness and air of superiority.
1, The first part of my post relates to you labelling me as one of Jose's 'fawning fans"....you are welcome to your opinion, but labelling fans without even engaging with them may just provoke a response....imagine if you walked up to someone in the street and labelled them like that, I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't be walking away without a 'comment' or two!
Get a grip. If you aren't a Jose fanboy, none of this matters. In fact, none of this matters anyway, it is all so pointless.
2, I get it, you want Jose sacked and you think that he is a 'tosser' too apparently. Just one thing though....if you've never met Jose, nor spent any meaningful time in his company, how do you know he is a tosser, and bully, and a nasty piece of work? Is that an opinion based on anything other than hearsay or conjecture? That's a rhetorical question by the way.
By the way, that isn't a rhetorical question, you just don't want me to answer it. Your suggestion is that unless I have personal experience of being bullied by Mourinho then I shouldn't claim he is a bully. Obviously, an utterly ridiculous statement. We are not in a court of law but if we were a lot of hearsay evidence would be admissable.
Also, I don't think you understand what hearsay is either. If I listen to Jose being a prick, and I think he is a prick, it is not hearsay.
3, The question was actually whether you disliked 'fans who support their manager, or just Spurs fans who support their manager'. In other words, what is so wrong with supporting the manager and why is it regarded as 'fawning' if you do? Well dodged though!
You asked me: "Do you dislike all fans who support their club's manager, or just Spurs fans who do it?" I responded, "I never said I disliked any fans." I answered your question very clearly. I don't dislike any fans and I never stated or suggested I did. Why is that difficult for you to understand? Are you simple? If you don't like the answer, then tough.
After the "in other words..." is a different question to the one you asked me. I did actually provide an answer to that where I said, "
I don't think I said your support for Jose is wrong. There are Jose fanboys on here, so supporting Jose above spurs would be wrong. If that isn't you, fine. But as to why I want him gone, it is explained above." Again a very clear answer. You don't have to agree with the answer but don't come on here accusing me of dodging answers and avoiding your post when I addressed each part separately.
4, Also, well done for spectacularly avoiding the main point of my post...I know, it's hard to see through all of that pro-Jose red mist right? Here, I'll give you another chance....
Good grief, all this because I said "fawning fan". I didn't miss anything from your post because I never engaged with you.
If you recognise that some of our players are not good enough (see numerous individual errors this season for proof), how can that be all down to our current manager when many of these players were not even signed or scouted by him?
If you really want to know what I think (I suspect you don't): I think we have a very good squad (as Jose went on about at the beginning of this season) that should be pushing for 2nd or 3rd. We have some defensive vulnerabilities but this should be mitigated by our attacking talent.
I never said "it" was all down to our manager. Obviously, the players have to take some responsibility. I don't know why you keep throwing these assumptions around. It is a managers job to manage the players he has...obviously.
Or, if you don't like the way we are playing right now (not many of us do btw), then how much of that is down to the manager/tactics and how much is down to having sub-standard playing staff in the first 11?
In terms of the "way we are playing" (I presume you means style) I blame Jose. They are his tactics and again he consistently says he likes how we play.
