My strongest side from then:
..........................................Gomes
Corluka..............
Dawson............
King.............
BAE
Lennon..............
Hudd..........
Modric...........
Bale
..........................
Defoe................
Crouch
Kranjcar
Kaboul
Pav
Alnwick
Jenas
Palacios
Bassong
Rose
My strongest side now:
........................................Lloris
Walker...........Vertonghen.............Vlad...................Rose
Lennon.............Sandro.................Dembele............Eriksen
...........................................Paulinho
.......................................Ade
Brad
Dawson
Naughton
Kaboul
Lamela
Soldado
Capoue
Siggy
Yes I do believe this squad, moreso the first XI is better than our current lot because; certain players, for all their shortcomings, worked better together (see the colour scheme). Now these are the nuances that people have referred to, so pay attention.
Any defence in the world is better with King in it..I'm going to take your petulant stance here and completely disregard the opinion of anyone who says different. Dawson complimented King well and, I think it's fair to say, Dawson was always better with King alongside, thus our centreback pairing then was better than any two individuals we could currently field because of King.
Is Corluka better than Walker? No, but did Corluka compliment Lennon more? Quite possibly so. Walker pushes up higher than Corluka ever did and in doing so give Lennon less space ahead of him on the wing to use his pace, Corluka would go as far as the halfway line and allow Lennon the rest of the field to terrorise the oppo leftback, and he did, these days I see lots of Walker and little of Lennon.
Similarly with the left wing, sure Bale at that time wasn't the player we sold, but he was still carving up the left wing with the pace and power that have made him such a formidable player, as good as Eriksen has been thus far, Bale was showing a lot more, even then, and he worked well with Benny. BAE was as assured as he has ever been, I still maintain he is a better tackler than Rose though he does divide opinion a lot.
I've replaced Palacios with Hudd but the essence was the same, patrol the midfield and pass to Modric, (this was more Palacios remit, Hudd would obviously allowed to pick his passes), but they both complimented Modric who has not been replaced by anyone. So, would I pick Sandro and Dembele over Hudd and Modric? No...for as much as Sandro would be picked ahead of Palacios, a midfield with Modric would be preferred over anyone.
You make it sound so obvious when you ask, is Ade better than Crouch? But that's not the issue, the issue is, are Paulinho and Ade better than Defoe and Crouch, and again the answer is that the lesser players made the better combination. Next season, maybe even later this season as Ade and Pauli get to understand each other better that will change as they are better players, but for now Defoe and Crouch played well together...England, Portsmouth and Spurs, the guys knew each other.
Finally I will piss a lot of people off and say that I would have absolutely no problem with playing Gomes rather than Lloris, Gomes was a fucking fantastic shot stopper and for all his soft goals conceded, he stopped shots he had no business getting close to! I don't feel there is much difference in either in punching the ball between the two of them and though Lloris is exceptionally better at patrolling his box and beyond, his kicking is fucking atrocious.
Do I believe this was a better squad to take on? Yes I do, because I believe as team they are better than the XI players on the field.
Do I believe this would be a better squad to take on Everton tomorrow? Yes I do, but I do have the benefit of hindsight knowing we've beat them with that team before.
Does any of this have anything to do with what Schmood was saying? No.
Once again Sammy you have decided to ignore 99% of what was said to you, you've taken one comment you thought you can 'win' with and headed off down that path. If you don't believe me, read the thread title.