Away kit?
Matches the suspected home kit
Has Erik Lamela just dropped a clue about next season's Spurs kit?

Matches the suspected home kit
Has Erik Lamela just dropped a clue about next season's Spurs kit?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Vote now for your Under Armour Goal of the Season! 6 June 2017 - News - tottenhamhotspur.com
Away kit?
![]()
Matches the suspected home kit
Has Erik Lamela just dropped a clue about next season's Spurs kit?
Have a close look at the Nike logo. It's obviously not a Nike shirt.Pretty sure that is the shirt.
Footyheadlines.com reckon it is, and they always seem to be on the money about these kind of things...
Nike Tottenham 17-18 Kit Leaked - Footy Headlines
Even if it ISN'T the new away kit... THAT'S still the kit for me!Away kit?
![]()
Matches the suspected home kit
Has Erik Lamela just dropped a clue about next season's Spurs kit?
Have a close look at the Nike logo. It's obviously not a Nike shirt.
It may be ripped off of the new line. They are produced in factories and designs ripped off by employees and knocked up in a sweatshop.
What makes it wrong or right? We've had what 4 or 5 shields previously, all of them different. Which one was right?
All the other ones apparently!What makes it wrong or right? We've had what 4 or 5 shields previously, all of them different. Which one was right?
What makes it wrong or right? We've had what 4 or 5 shields previously, all of them different. Which one was right?
For me I would prefer continuity and the club emblem should never be fucked with as also its' colours. It's why, rightly so, when new owners come into any club for some reason many feel compelled to change either. It's why I like it (if it's true) as it goes back to early 1920's. (yep i am aware we had stripes and a red kit and emblems with H's on etc but we were an amateur club then).2 removed the ball and the one that didn't , like the new version, you see the shield first.
To me, I'd like to think we're more than a generic shield.
Almost, but not all.Also from a manufacturing point of view Nike will be able to apply the shield badge a lot easier than just the standard cock n ball. Correct me if I'm wrong but all their team kits seem to have shield style badges.
I also love the idea of incorporating the two classic features of "Chicken Badges of the past" by using both the 'Cock & Ball' and the Shield!![]()
![]()
It's all personal preference. For me I love it, I also love our early ones too, which I feel it replicates.
I also love the idea of incorporating the two classic features of "Chicken Badges of the past" by using both the 'Cock & Ball' and the Shield!
none have quite had both (Pony came close... but the shield shape was awful!)
This one is an exercise in box ticking!
What makes it wrong or right? We've had what 4 or 5 shields previously, all of them different. Which one was right?