I am way past questioning at this point. I am accusing loudly. It's biased AND wildly inconsistent at best, outright corrupt at worst. The counter argument is that if anyone was going to bribe the refs, it would be the Forest owner. But I guess they are all owned by rich people, so who the fuck knows?When you think about the minimal contact Son got penalised for from VAR against Brentford. You have to question the integrity of the refereeing.
I'm sticking with my original impression: VAR is just a time-out to allow the bidding to finish.