• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management So (hypothetically) who replaces Ange then?

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Who to replace Ange?

  • Andoni Iraola

  • Edin Terzic

  • Graham Potter

  • Thomas Frank

  • Marco Silva

  • Kieran McKenna

  • Ryan Mason (Full Time)

  • Michel

  • Xavi

  • Mauricio Pochettino

  • Dino Toppmoller

  • Simone Inzaghi

  • Sean Dyche (Click here if you're an idiot)

  • No-one (Ange new contract)

  • Oliver Glasner

  • Vincenzo Italiano

  • Vitor Pereira

  • Scott Parker

  • Will Still


Results are only viewable after voting.
Please NO! Farioli was in pole position for the title in the Eredivisie. 1 point in front of PSV on de 33th round. After round 33 it Ajax was second with 1 point behind PSV.
The playstyle of Farioli is boring and background as a psychologist (and goalie ). He made a lot of roulation changes during the season and the fans of Ajax are not disappointed that he has left now.
Edit: his playstyle is made of a stable defense. At Ajax he played with a 41 year old (Dutch) goalkeeper who led the defense.
Doesn’t sound like the coach we need. Think better options in the PL but paratici does like to dip into his homeland a lot.
 
Apparently Farioli plays a 4-3-3 with a high defensive line and uses inverted full backs.

Is it possible to experience PTSD when you're still experiencing the traumatic event.

No, fucking, thank you.
 
De Zerbi's got Marseille into the CL and is saying he 100% wants to stay next season. Marseilles are a mad club with an absolute tool (Longoria) of a President, which managers continually struggle to work with, so De Zerbi could still walk. He would probably be the most evolutionary option to Ange and would mean a degree of continuity within the academy coaching etc.
 
No, never said it was.

But still, he's performing in line with their budget and will achieve as good a finish as they usually tend to get. I don't buy the idea he's "rubbish in the league" given what's available to him.

The point I wanted to make, was that he may be falling in line with Palace's standards, but if he comes to Spurs, he won't be dealing with a squad of 25+ year old experienced veterans; he will have to get a tune out of a group of players, with a significant number of them being young, with very limited experience (Bergvall, Gray, Dragusin, VDV, Sarr, Udogie, Moore, Johnson, Kinsky, Spence, Yang, Vlahovic).

Building a young squad, from the ground up takes a very different skill set vs inheriting a squad of experienced players in their prime.
 
No, never said it was.

But still, he's performing in line with their budget and will achieve as good a finish as they usually tend to get. I don't buy the idea he's "rubbish in the league" given what's available to him.
He's lost 11 games this season and won a first ever FA Cup for Palace.
The season we took Pochettino he lost 12 games with Saints.

I'm not sure why people are downplaying Glasners achievements this year?

It seems like what some posters on here want is someone that:

- Can develop youth
- Plays attacking football
- Can excel beyond expectations
- Proven at a big club
- Consistently gets results
- Champions league pedigree

Unless we can clone Jurgen Klopp, why would any manager that meets all these requirements want to come to the current train wreck at N17?
 
It seems like what some posters on here want is someone that:

- Can develop youth
- Plays attacking football
- Can excel beyond expectations
- Proven at a big club
- Consistently gets results
- Champions league pedigree

Unless we can clone Jurgen Klopp, why would any manager that meets all these requirements want to come to the current train wreck at N17?

Agree. It does seem that many fans don't know what they want.

Do you want to develop a young team over many seasons; or buy established players ang get immediate results? Clearly, the latter is not possible for Spurs since they cannot attract (or will pay for) top talent.

So, just like we did under Poch, we have to get young players and develop them. This is not an attractive prospect for "elite" coaches who want immediate success (e.g. Pep, Conte, Mourinho); and it seems it is not an attractive prospect for the fans, who have tasted life in the top 4, and will accept nothing less.
 
He's lost 11 games this season and won a first ever FA Cup for Palace.
The season we took Pochettino he lost 12 games with Saints.

I'm not sure why people are downplaying Glasners achievements this year?

It seems like what some posters on here want is someone that:

- Can develop youth
- Plays attacking football
- Can excel beyond expectations
- Proven at a big club
- Consistently gets results
- Champions league pedigree

Unless we can clone Jurgen Klopp, why would any manager that meets all these requirements want to come to the current train wreck at N17?

Closest to meeting all that is Xavi
 
Closest to meeting all that is Xavi
I'm not against Xavi. My only concerns are that the Premier League is unlike any other major league, it's faster, more aggressive and while maybe not as technical as Spain or Italy, it's certainly more competitive. So someone with Premier league experience would be advantageous considering the position we're in.
Xavi also managed a world class team, and although they were in a transitional phase and blooding youngsters, the are a team build on success, they have a winning mentality and have an excellent academy.

It's different at Spurs, we don't have a winning mentality at all, from the team right through to the fanbase. Our academy is ok but its not throwing out gems every year. We are also not going to throw a ton of money at the team, especially if it all goes horribly wrong tomorrow night.

I'd say everything hinges on tomorrow. Lose and we'll lose big players and will enter a transitional period where we probably need a motivator like Harry to get us back on track. Win and we HAVE to push on and forge an identity to get back where we were under Poch, that'll start with the right appointment to compliment the players we have.
 
I'm not against Xavi. My only concerns are that the Premier League is unlike any other major league, it's faster, more aggressive and while maybe not as technical as Spain or Italy, it's certainly more competitive. So someone with Premier league experience would be advantageous considering the position we're in.
Xavi also managed a world class team, and although they were in a transitional phases and blooding youngsters, the are a team build on success, they have a winning mentality and have an excellent academy.

It's different at Spurs, we don't have a winning mentality at all, from the team right through to the fanbase. Our academy is ok but its not throwing out gems every year. We are also not going to throw a ton of money at the team, especially if it all goes horribly wrong tomorrow night.

I'd say everything hinges on tomorrow. Lose and we'll lose big players and will enter a transitional period where we probably need a motivator like Harry to get us back on track. Win and we HAVE to push on and forget an identity to get back where we were under Poch, that'll start with the right appointment to compliment the players we have.

Nuno had PL experience. Jose had all the experience in the world.

Ange had no PL experience and finished 5th without Kane. This season now that he has PL experience, we are 17th.

I don't really see the massive bonus for PL experience tbh. It's a fact for players but a cliche for coaches IMO.
 
Nuno had PL experience. Jose had all the experience in the world.

Ange had no PL experience and finished 5th without Kane. This season now that he has PL experience, we are 17th.

I don't really see the massive bonus for PL experience tbh. It's a fact for players but a cliche for coaches IMO.
Yeah but what's the common denominator, Nuno failed with us, going great with Forest. Mourinho failed with us, went well with Manchester Utd, in fairness he could have won us a trophy.

Ange has been found out at this level, that's all. It's unfair to use him as a benchmark because of his tactical weaknesses. I think we all agree he shouldn't have been considered in the first place.

It's certainly an advantage to come into the league knowing how combative it is. Local knowledge always make a difference, how much of a difference will be down the the particular manager.
 
Yeah but what's the common denominator, Nuno failed with us, going great with Forest. Mourinho failed with us, went well with Manchester Utd, in fairness he could have won us a trophy.

Ange has been found out at this level, that's all. It's unfair to use him as a benchmark because of his tactical weaknesses. I think we all agree he shouldn't have been considered in the first place.

It's certainly an advantage to come into the league knowing how combative it is. Local knowledge always make a difference, how much of a difference will be down the the particular manager.

Not really imo. That's what I'm saying. There isn't really any evidence to support that for coaches.
 
In fairness i suppose a club 17th in the league can’t be turning out noses up at half the names on the list.
As it stands out best shot of premier league survival next season is hoping that the three promoted championship teams are shite again.

Not really.

The whole point of employing a new gaffa is not accepting that 17th is our level.
 
Last edited:
Poch cracked the Levy code imo.

Which entailed what specifially?

Walker
Vert (and his partnership with Toby)
Eriksen
Dembele
Dele
Kane
Lloris
...all fell into his lap.

Rose too (but he clearly made him a better player).

Thats 9 of his first XI.

People complain about Levy being tight, but whether one chooses to acknowledge that our money was being ploughed into the stadium at the time; Poch didn't "crack" that "code".... Instead he pouted his way to a season with no new signings and was clearly burned out when he left
 
Back
Top