• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2020 Transfer Thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Wonder what’s going to happen with Rose?

R_o_c_h_d_a_l_e

ENXDGIqWoAQKibk.jpg
 
But if we are going to swap 27yo Aurier lets do it for a RB who's younger and at least has potential to be better, not one that's older and not much better.

I don't love Aurier, I don't mind him going, but this isn't good squad building IMO and this is part of how we've got ourselves fucked up in the first place.

You have been asked the question plenty of times but ducked the answer.

Given that Aurier was always going, who is better but younger and at a modest cost

Doherty to me looks like an upgrade as he doesnt have Aurier's errors - and being HG when Aurier leaves it frees up another Overseas trained player place (and we are short of overseas trained player places).
 
I don't see how Doherty is considered a more creative RB than Auier. Raw number, Auier 5 assists, Doherty 3 and Doherty played 100 more minutes, Aurier KP per 90 = 1, Doherty 0.6. If you delve a bit deeper Doherty's XA is 2.13, Aurier's is 3.60 (the second highest at Spurs last season).

Doherty did score 4 goals, to Aurier's 1 but that's not being creative for others. And Doherty did play all season as a WB.

Aurier quantifiably creates more and of better quality than Doherty.

I don't think 12m for 28yo who's actually not much better at Aurier at anything except scoring seems like smart squad building to me ?
Ahhh I just realised the stats I mentioned are compiled over the last two seasons, he is second only to Trent in chances created for that. People have said since Traore pushed on this season dominating the whole right flank it has hindered Doherty’s output.

He actually comes inside and behaves like a second striker occasionally if you watched him a lot this season. He seemed to be performing better in 18/19 when his remit was to stay wide right from what I can remember.

Either way I get your point, I don’t think it’s “smart squad building” but I think he is an upgrade on aurier I really do, even if it’s only for 2 seasons. We just need a capable understudy to be signed if not this window then the next.
 
Chilwell isn't anything special to be honest.

Certainly not worth £50,000,000.

I'm sure people just see 'NEW SIGNING' and '50 MILL' and get depressed it wasn't us wasting money on an average player.

I can understand people getting upset over Werner and Ziyech (even though we have Kane and Son) - but Chillwell, really?
To be honest all 3 of those signings I'm not that bothered about. I think Werner and Ziyech are overrated. I'd much rather Kane and Son. Or even Son and Bergwijn.

I would also choose Ben Davies as a better defender than Chilwell. Going forward Chilwell is better so maybe slight better overall. But certainly not the greatest defender and can be got at if a winger runs at him.
 
To be honest all 3 of those signings I'm not that bothered about. I think Werner and Ziyech are overrated. I'd much rather Kane and Son. Or even Son and Bergwijn.

I would also choose Ben Davies as a better defender than Chilwell. Going forward Chilwell is better so maybe slight better overall. But certainly not the greatest defender and can be got at if a winger runs at him.

Not sure I'd agree that Davies is a better defender than Chilwell, and I rate Davies.

Chilwell is a true left-footed left back who can defend at the PL level and is also a big offensive threat going forward. That might be the single hardest thing to find in football, that's a really valuable commodity.

He's the best of the three signings for me. He obviously makes Chelsea a better team on day one, which is not clear of the others. Havertz would be another level though.
 
So the stats about Doherty being the 2nd most creative RB in the premier must have been league only then? because he was above aurier in that by a reasonable chunk.

Also I get your point about it not being a sensible signing for the future, but he is cheap and he is what the manager wants. If Jose is going to succeed here I would expect a couple more signings like this one. Short term signings.

In this market is 16m cheap for a 28yo mid table RB ?

I amended the radar just to show just PL last season comparison. Aurier definitely more tangibly/quantifiably creative. Doherty better progressing stats, but part of that is that all Wolves do is whack the ball from the defensive third to the attacking third, makes progression stats look better IMO.
 
Not sure I'd agree that Davies is a better defender than Chilwell, and I rate Davies.

Chilwell is a true left-footed left back who can defend at the PL level and is also a big offensive threat going forward. That might be the single hardest thing to find in football, that's a really valuable commodity.

He's the best of the three signings for me. He obviously makes Chelsea a better team on day one, which is not clear of the others. Havertz would be another level though.
Sarr made Chilwell look silly defensively at the back end of last season. Before Chilwell scored a worldie.

But yes Chilwell is the best signing of the 3
 
You have been asked the question plenty of times but ducked the answer.

Given that Aurier was always going, who is better but younger and at a modest cost

Doherty to me looks like an upgrade as he doesnt have Aurier's errors - and being HG when Aurier leaves it frees up another Overseas trained player place (and we are short of overseas trained player places).

I've answered this question many times, there aren't many RB's out there who I'm in love with right now, but I'd still rather have one that's younger, has some scope, and can retain some inherent value, who we won't be struggling to get off the payroll in two years time, than an older one I don't love much either.

If we are selling Aurier for 20m Eur, then why not spend 15m Eur and get Hakimi - another who's played as a RWB but has also played as a RB.

Back up option, Atal is a player, like Doherty, who's been used predominantly as a RWB, but is much quicker than Doherty. Would almost certainly cost less/same and is about 4 years younger.

I really don't see Doherty as much of an upgrade on Aurier generally. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Aurier loads.
 
In this market is 16m cheap for a 28yo mid table RB ?

I amended the radar just to show just PL last season comparison. Aurier definitely more tangibly/quantifiably creative. Doherty better progressing stats, but part of that is that all Wolves do is whack the ball from the defensive third to the attacking third, makes progression stats look better IMO.
A homegrown 28 year old that has been one of the best performing RWB/RB’s in the league over the past 2 seasons? Yeah I would say anything under £25million is cheap when you consider chilwell went for double that and I don’t rate him that highly.

Just my opinion though of course, there hasn’t been all that much movement outside of Chelsea so it’s hard to gauge prices.
 
I've answered this question many times, there aren't many RB's out there who I'm in love with right now, but I'd still rather have one that's younger, has some scope, and can retain some inherent value, who we won't be struggling to get off the payroll in two years time, than an older one I don't love much either.

If we are selling Aurier for 20m Eur, then why not spend 15m Eur and get Hakimi - another who's played as a RWB but has also played as a RB.

Back up option, Atal is a player, like Doherty, who's been used predominantly as a RWB, but is much quicker than Doherty. Would almost certainly cost less/same and is about 4 years younger.

I really don't see Doherty as much of an upgrade on Aurier generally. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Aurier loads.

Fair enough but you're comparing potential risks to PL proven.
 
I've answered this question many times, there aren't many RB's out there who I'm in love with right now, but I'd still rather have one that's younger, has some scope, and can retain some inherent value, who we won't be struggling to get off the payroll in two years time, than an older one I don't love much either.

If we are selling Aurier for 20m Eur, then why not spend 15m Eur and get Hakimi - another who's played as a RWB but has also played as a RB.

Back up option, Atal is a player, like Doherty, who's been used predominantly as a RWB, but is much quicker than Doherty. Would almost certainly cost less/same and is about 4 years younger.

I really don't see Doherty as much of an upgrade on Aurier generally. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Aurier loads.

You're focusing to much on the negatives there are some good reasons to sign Doherty.

He may not be a true worldy but Doherty is young enough to play two seasons and still have resale value, sure that's finance not football, but when spending 20m that matters.

Mourinho likes playing a back five, he likes having full backs who are not only capable of going forward, but offer a genuine goal threat, and at the same time are disciplined in defence especially at set pieces ... Doherty is a step up on Aurier in all three of those areas.

Sure a younger version, TAA for example, would be better but he's valued at 100m and Liverpool aren't selling, the list of other experienced quality EPL attacking RB's is very short Kyle Walker, Wan-Bissaka, maybe Pereira, then Doherty is probably next on that list.

We do need to develop a couple of young RB's but right now if Aurier is going (and even if he isn't) we need a ready made player and Doherty is one of the few options available.
 
Last edited:
I've answered this question many times, there aren't many RB's out there who I'm in love with right now, but I'd still rather have one that's younger, has some scope, and can retain some inherent value, who we won't be struggling to get off the payroll in two years time, than an older one I don't love much either.

If we are selling Aurier for 20m Eur, then why not spend 15m Eur and get Hakimi - another who's played as a RWB but has also played as a RB.

Back up option, Atal is a player, like Doherty, who's been used predominantly as a RWB, but is much quicker than Doherty. Would almost certainly cost less/same and is about 4 years younger.

I really don't see Doherty as much of an upgrade on Aurier generally. And I say that as someone who doesn't like Aurier loads.
Hakimi has already signed for Inter for 40m (more than twice what Doherty will cost), so not an option.

Atal has had a serious knee injury, so might not be the same player, plus Doherty got the same amount of goals and assists last season as Atal has in his entire senior club level career, most of which Atal scored and assisted as an attacker, not a RWB. That's before you add in PL experience (a big plus with our fixture congestion early on) and HG status.
 
Back
Top