To put things into perspective, it's the difference between Gary Lineker and Paul Gascoigne and Chris Armstrong and Jason Dozzell.Sad, but inevitable.... That's 5 seasons ago now.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
To put things into perspective, it's the difference between Gary Lineker and Paul Gascoigne and Chris Armstrong and Jason Dozzell.Sad, but inevitable.... That's 5 seasons ago now.
LOLYou admire Igula so much you wanted to become more like him![]()
The £100m wasn't a bid but City informally sounding out Spurs... Levy gave a hard no.
The Sun £160m is being slightly misreported by the media (and weirdly even the Sun headline misreported their own article).
There was no reporting that £160m was accepted. The source at Kane's wedding said that Levy had told Kane that he had changed his mind and was going to sell him. The potential price was pure speculation.
it amounts to the same thing, he's disgruntled with the lack of achievements and would rather not be here, so I don't see Kane as a fully committed striker.That's a different comment and insinuation though.... And you KNOW it.
That was a great moment tbh.This is your new avatar:
Keep it until at least August 31st, although you can have it longer than that if you'd like.
Easy to change avatar, save the photo, and then click edit on your profile. Shouldn't need a mod to help![]()
it amounts to the same thing, he's disgruntled with the lack of achievements and would rather not be here, so I don't see Kane as a fully committed striker.
IF - he's going to be asked to stay another year, we're dropping his price by about £50m, but then what, we need to find a new striker then, kick the can down the road.
IMO sell now if we can attract Vlahovic, get max price, you can bet your ass Dusan will be a LOT more expensive soon.
Sounds dangerousI was just wondering out load.
Eastwood hasn't got a Best Western it does however have the Sun InnWhat do you think is Eastwood‘s best Western
That 13mil doesn’t have to spent singularly….it can be added to other monies the club may haveHow is it an amazing deal? Can we get anybody better than him for 13 million quid?
it amounts to the same thing, he's disgruntled with the lack of achievements and would rather not be here, so I don't see Kane as a fully committed striker.
IF - he's going to be asked to stay another year, we're dropping his price by about £50m, but then what, we need to find a new striker then, kick the can down the road.
IMO sell now if we can attract Vlahovic, get max price, you can bet your ass Dusan will be a LOT more expensive soon.
That 160m is pie in the sky imo. We know that we turned down 100m and he would be 80m+ next year probably.Regarding Kane, if he stays another year, how much will we lose then?
Contract run down more.... maybe lose £50m. Which would mean we're effectively losing £1m per week.
So unless he signs a new contract...... be as well selling now.
My action would be replace him with Vlahovic (if possible), we already got Son, in this situation I'd get Ings for a season or two, bring Scarlett through.I'm in agreement with you actually, if Kane is going to leave next year for £100M, then there's an argument we should sell him this year for £150M.
However, we have to replace him with 3 quality players in my opinion. As I wrote in an earlier post, a lot of the potential alternatives are no longer possible, ie Isak, Malen, Daka.
Which 3 players would realistically do the job?
Life in itself is dangerous. And none of us will come out alive anyway...Sounds dangerous
See, I'm not too harsh.That was a great moment tbh.
There are two kinds of people. Those with a loaded gun and those who dig.What do you think is Eastwood‘s best Western
Wait i stepped out, have we signed Keanu Revees?You shut your whore mouth.
He was excellent in Bram Stoker's Dracula.
The problem is we have no idea. We could buy Isak and Scarlett may end up the next Harry Kane with Isak the next Soldado. If it were me, I'd go for that young Czech kid Hlozek, get Ings to fill in for a couple of years, and hope in the meantime one of Hlozek or Scarlett develop into a really good striker.I'm in agreement with you actually, if Kane is going to leave next year for £100M, then there's an argument we should sell him this year for £150M.
However, we have to replace him with 3 quality players in my opinion. As I wrote in an earlier post, a lot of the potential alternatives are no longer possible, ie Isak, Malen, Daka.
Which 3 players would realistically do the job?
Paratici clearly has another job …. “ Have you been involved in an accident in the last month …”Incredible isn’t it. Some on here talking about paratici as the second coming because he’s “on the phone a lot”
don’t get it
We should have been making this sort of bet more often under Poch (buy players, wins stuff to pay for them) and we never really did.But if we get the top 4 then that will more than make up for it.