Don’t like to disagree without adding a reason as to why, and I recognise what follows is highlighting a lot of the “negatives”Levy's been, on balance, a very good, indeed probably great CEO/Chairman. Given the budgetary constraints, we've moved forward a long way, to the point we were invited to join a European Super League. There will always be fuck ups and mistakes - letting Glenn sign loads of old players for one - but impressive in the round.
But Levy as minority owner and Lewis as majority owner have been long on stability and short on trophies. Not all bad but not enough for Levy's practical achievements to eliminate criticism of our ownership. Nothing that a CL or league title wouldn't fix!
So as I see this, Levy / ENIC took over the forth most successful club in English football history. In 22 years they have seen tangible success once. They have gone close a couple more times.
In that period of time they have gone through more than 10 first team coaches. Various directors of football and hundreds of players. They have sold three of their biggest assets in that period setting the team back years when doing so. They once sold Keane and Berbatov in a single window. Madness. Sold Bale and replaced him with much that was questionable.
They hit gold with a coaching team and then managed to kill the golden goose with baffling decisions. Selling Dembele and replacing him with ?? Window after window failing to buy a striker. Jose for the sake of Amazon. Ridiculous.
The stadium was ultimately a success, but for a good 5 years it was a total farce. And it was how many millions over budget ?
On the more positive, they have done a lot for the local community in recent years, they are majorly promoting the club in evolving markets and they do seem very much to be learning lessons, so maybe