This returns us to the gaping hole I mention. If it’s not Hitchens job as I believe he was titled chief scout, if we assume the manager prioritises the first team, then who was keeping a hand on the tiller regarding those coming through, negotiating suitable loans and contracts to keep them tied to the club?
Without being in the know, some reasonable conclusions can be drawn on Hitchen that amount to he was way out of his depth. If he had more about him he could have identified the areas that paratici has and got the right people in.
We now have 3 new staff including paratici, that are deemed necessary.
He oversaw some of our worst years on the academy front and transfer wise.
There's a whole lot of confirmation bias in your post. Hitchens is just an easy target.
You post stars by defining Hitchens as Chief Scout...... In which case, no it wasn't his job to negotiate loans and contracts.
Since McDermot wound his time down, we've experienced a fair amount of churn at every level......
Academy 'director' (Misc. upheaval.)
U23s manager (Timmy, Ledley, Mason.... Other)
Senior manager (Timmy, Poch, Jose, Mason, Nuno, Conte)
Recruitment/scouting crew (Cast of many inc. Hitchens)
Senior manager (Both Poch & Jose were calling the shots re: loans).
DOF / head of recruitment (Levy, Mitchel, Hitchens, Fab, Poch had deep influence until he left.)
Even though he proved pretty shabby on the whole; truth is he only had majority DOF-clout for a couple of years.
Last edited:

