Strongly feel like we'll be back in for Zaniolo in January or next summer.
He got injured again didn't he? Not exactly a positive sign .. although from what I can recall it was totally unrelated to his old ACL issues so maybe just bad luck.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Strongly feel like we'll be back in for Zaniolo in January or next summer.
----romero---better CB----lengletthink we also need a better back three , not just a better RWB when we play 3:4:3 with 2 defensive midfielders.
those 3 CBs need to be able to play. Sanchez is a very good defender but weak in position. Many a time Ham players closed him down resulting in a point up the field amd back to the Opposition. And when not pressured it was often simple ball to royal who at this point would already be under pressure .
The same is true of Davies and Dier, not great passers, not great when pressured usually resulting in a hopeful punt.
Is that Mr Tumble shooting his load?
You have seen alot of Spurs summer windows haven't you figure it out.
He will never play for us my opinion. Feels like a moment that passed and we will move on.He got injured again didn't he? Not exactly a positive sign .. although from what I can recall it was totally unrelated to his old ACL issues so maybe just bad luck.
I don't think you need to worry about Son being 30 and Kane being 29. Whereas in years past this signified the beginning of a player's decline, with modern sports science players can play at a very high level well into their early and mid-thirties. I think we have a good 3-4 years left from Son and Kane. Plenty of time to make a title challenge.I agree with both of you...
But at the same time - Son is 30, Kane is 29 and Conte does not stay for the long term.
There is no guarantee how long can we benefit from those conditions really.
We have made really good deals in this window, but I think considering how limited window we are talking about, we could have taken the risk and try some more. I think two players that could have made difference and cost 100 mil combined would have been Botman (moved for 37 mil to Newcastle) and Maddisson (I think we would have got him for 63 mil). This could have completed our dealings, even if we have Royal, Doherty and Spence to pick from in RWB position... now it feels we've done reasonable amount of changes, but if we would have pushed it bit more...
----romero---better CB----lenglet
will be far better, especially when having to break down a side. all the top sides have CB's who are technically competent and can play the ball out with composure and quality.
How we rating this window then?
Most of us still of the view that “well how can we improve these positions? There’s no one available?”
Funny how other teams - our competitors - identify targets, then sign them. We are incapable of that.
We haven’t addressed CB (x 2), RWB, CM, nor the lack of creativity.
Man City, Man Utd, Woolwich, Chelsea have signed players to improve their first teams. We aren’t able to do that because “no one’s available”.
Another pathetic window. Another window where we have been out spent by almost 50% of the league.
So much for backing Conte.
Our defensive transfers: a player who isn’t here, a player who can’t make the squad, a player on loan who has been dreadful for 24 months and who’s parent club want shot of him; and a (granted, talented) wing back who we got on a free but who we will get a max of 2 years out of. And we still have Dier, Davies, Sanchez starting games. It’s astonishing.
Whose the broad
That’s constructive.On behalf of all of TFC: Shut the fuck up.
Absolutely no one on here values your opinions, you miserable fucking cunt.
Yay! I wasn't banned... Here's £20!!!
Is that his missus? Good god