• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

How Dry should our Powder be?


  • Total voters
    57
What! Is that it!. .Not 9 or 10

9kpIk5Q.gif
monty python GIF
 
SC WLB:

Ange likes garner at Everton.

on Neto:
Anges dream . Club trying to stay under the radar for this one but believe ange Lange may have sold the player the dream . Jorge might be an issue as he’s a crafty fuck and can’t be trusted . He’s gettable in fees tho wages are steep but in line
His profile to a tee . Can play both sides is dynamic and is a one vs one specialist . Gains you 15/20 plus goals from different plays. Few would be 55/60 mill.

I’m not saying he will be a spurs player yet ! But the management love him. I do find it hard to see both him and eze tbh but ange wants both . If the strategy doesn’t come off they have another route .

I mean if we’re gonna ban FootyInsider, and rightfully so, why are we posting this nonsense from a site that everyone here despises.
 
Openda
Williams or Simons
Gibbs-White or Eze
Gray
Geertruida

That would be a really good spend from my ignorant perspective.

What I am less excited by is the likes of

Toney
Abrahams
Torres
McKennie
Hummels

and some of the other shitters we have been linked to that would all end up lower amounts required than the top list.

Thanks for responding :)
 
Was mentioning this earlier.

So WLB claims to know that Neto is Ange's dream signing and that it's Ange that like Garner.

They have given up trying to be credible now.

If we were looking at other of those players it would be because the budget to sign them suits our needs more than a more expensive first choice.

I don't know what's worse anymore. The level of delusion from the liar "ITK's" or the level of insanity from the "norms" who lap it up so fervently. Every single window. Despite all the shit they get wrong.
 
Yeah, don't think he would be either CT or HG for UEFA comps because they only start counting the 3 years from the season you turn 15 and he left England at 16. Would be HG for the Prem but would take up an overseas slot for UEFA so not ideal.
Them rules are friggin silly IMHO.

Should just be English vs foreign import. Period.

Instead, they should look at all them South Americans getting Italian, Spanish or Portuguese passports faster than a 15yo virgin splash his load on a titty mag. Friggin joke.
 
Keep them paying.
If that isn't a massive red flag then the idiots who pay up fully deserve to be scammed out of everything they have.
Especially the ones who act like Jonny Big Bollocks and say "Donated £200" like it's a direct inference they have a big cock.

If you want to pay for the upkeep of the site then fair play but to pay for ITK? You have to be a special type of idiot.

Most of them saying they have paid are probably in on it.
 
Them rules are friggin silly IMHO.

Should just be English vs foreign import. Period.

Instead, they should look at all them South Americans getting Italian, Spanish or Portuguese passports faster than a 15yo virgin splash his load on a titty mag. Friggin joke.
The issue is that players can play for the country they play in if they live there long enough and don't have caps from their home country.
So let's say Sarr had never had a call up, in a few years he could qualify as English and play for England. In order to account for that eventuality, you have to define what homegrown is.
And you could easily argue a player who has come up through a clubs academy is homegrown regardless of where they're from.
The only alternative is to have dual homegrown status. Where you're from and where you're at.
 
Back
Top