Yeah when even Woolwich, who happily employ a rapist, don't even want you there's something up.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer thread - 2024
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Yeah when even Woolwich, who happily employ a rapist, don't even want you there's something up.
The same is true for almost every single rumour in every single transfer window.
Wait until they trot out the reason we haven’t pushed the button on players is because we need to sell Richy to cover the fees. Can see it coming a mile off from the club. It’s exactly the bullshit they’ll feed us and we will be forced to accept.
How many times has this been answered.
He was one year left on his contract... He doesn't want to sign an extension.... And they don't want to lose him on a free...
Looking at their transfer dealings like moving on Berrenechea, Soule and Huijsen they're clearly not a very good judge of talent either.
Sounds a long winded way of writing Ange told him to jog on and mind his own fucking business
If there is no striker available better than what we have, why would we sign them?
If Ange thinks Solanke or Toney is an upgrade we will probably try to buy one of them. If they think Gyökeres can cut the mustard in the PL they'll probably have a crack at him. If they upgrade other positions and not the striker they must not rate the strikers any better than what we have.
Son is ageing & Richie is hit and miss and Injury Prone - If we go into next season without signing another Striker who can compete with what we currently have then I think it is a huge failure!
Don't get me wrong I know its not the easiest position to recruit for but we sold Kane for £100 Million nearly a year ago - We should have had his replacement lined up long before we sold him otherwise we are going to get into a situation soon where we are not only having to replace Kane who we sold lat summer, but we are also having to replace Son.
No it doesn’t.
0.2 would be ruled out by VAR surelyCorrect it’s not a goal till it’s a whole goal
It’s also given Ange a good chance to look at a few youngsters and touch wood they have done very well
Last edited:
Wide forwards scoring goals, not that many can score like Son and Salah these days. Assist stats are only good if the strikers actually score from a so called assist.
I’d like to say Lautaro Martinez but doubt it. The obvious one missing which I reckon is a strong possibility is Santiago Gimenez.
If you could read, you would understand I am not comparing them. Just pointing how your GA obsession is utter rubbish and completely worthless (to compare Chiesa vs Werner solely based on data).Did you just put Modric in the same sentence as Chiesa?
I'm going to end this conversation for your sake...
Why can’t we sell Richarlison and get 2 new forwards in? Also think Lanksheer should get some chances ,certainly ahead of Scarlett.
Its worth looking at both Liverpool and Woolwich in recent years - both went without a conventional striker for several years, reason simply good strikers weren't available. at any sensible cost.
Both went down the road of getting forwards who might have been described by some as wing forwars etc - and that's why Salah became Liverpool's main goal scorer.
And whilst ManU had strikers (eg Martial), usually they underwhelmed with goals coming from lots of other positions !
Everyone is looking for the next Mane/Salah combination.
Because he’s shit and always injured - Lecy will probably want 30M and I doubt anyone will pay more than 5
is he? based on what?