The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
This thread gets on my tits every year, but now we are discussing the fucking theory of evolution?
No idea if Guehi rumours are true but we did make a pathetic doomed to fail bid on deadline day in January . If true we are competing with Liverpool then it’s another ridiculous we tried moment . Now this might not be the case, but we have plenty of previous making bids that we knew when making them they would fail . The usual tactic was bidding for players with third party ownership , but that has been done to death , so new ways of failing are needed.
But we get ?We want:
A world class CB
A world class DM
A world clas AM
A world class striker
We need??
Maybe a decent DM
Back up AM
Nice to pretend thoughI don’t see us buying another CB unless we are planning on selling Romero at the end of the window, which none of us would put past the club.

My man, in terms of "we tried but the other club moved the goalposts", that's a homerun for Levy. I mean, it's perfect as far as he's concerned...club can come out with its usual bullshit of "MGW was Thomas' No 1 pick", "No point signing an alternative not really fancied by the boss", "No point signing someone that's not gonna improve what we've already got" etc etc. And he doesn't spend a penny.
That Forest owner/chairman is an absolute cunt, but let's be honest...so us ours.
Tel, Takai and Kudus come July 22nd, after finishing 17th with 22 losses...that's inexcusable.
Not sure I was even moaning. Bidding for Guehi on deadline day in Jan and negotiations with players with 3rd party ownerships are just posturing and doomed to fail . I was merely pointing this out. If you think about it , I was praising Daniel for getting creative and not insulting us with a blatantly transparent doomed strategy. Instead we seem to be allegedly spinning a going toe to toe with Liverpool narrative
If that's the case, however, why hasn't something as simple and straightforward as this not come out in the past 10 days? Instead Forest are claiming we approached the player illegally, not that the release clause wasn't valid.One interesting hypothetical angle to this … imagine if MGWs release clause only was activated if Forest did not qualify for the CL or EL, and the day we bid was the day they later got elevated to the EL (due to Palace’s owner issue). Is the release clause active or not?
Good post, and I agree. I'm guessing one of the reasons we are attractive to young players is because they feel they are likely to get more game time?I'm not really convinced that's how Spurs operate. There is a large scouting network, and they would have been tracking many players for years.
Tel, Danso, Vuskovic, Kudus, Takai and Gibbs-White (hopefully just a formality) improves the squad. Still some glaring gaps, with Spence/Davies not really good enough to play backup to Udogie/Porro.
We don't shop in the market of elite players who are close to their prime, but we do compete with the big teams for young 'up and coming' players. And I'd say that Spurs getting Vuskovic, Bergvall, Tel, Gray, Van De Ven should be regarded as significant in beating off other bigger teams that would have been interested.
Because it annoys you? Yeah, the club should primarily think of whether fans are annoyed rather than what the best transfer options are.I honestly don't care anymore. Either release a definitive statement or move on. We can't have this debacle messing up the transfer window.
