Ho ho ho,
If Bergwijn had 20 g/a per season in PL before we bought him, we probably couldn't afford him.
Eze was not available for £10-15m in January.....only reason we might get him for £10m-£15m or quite possible more this summer is because by then he will only have a year left on his contract.,,,,,,and QPR are skint.
And he's got 13 goals and 8 assists (ie combined 21) in 40 games this season in the Championship aged 21 (not dissimilar to Bergwijn in NL who got 26 g/a aged 21).
If we use your criteria to only buy him when he has 20 g/a in PL we wont be able to afford very many players.
I didn't say we should only buy players who have 20 g/a in the PL. You were using Eredivise stats which aren't really relevant when I was talking about what our players had done in the PL. Being productive in the Eredivisie doesn't mean a player can't be productive in the PL, but until he's actually proven he can be in both, those Eredivisie stats need to be qualified by the fact that most of the teams he's up against are championship or even lower level, certainly vastly different to the PL. The level of opposition Eze is up against is probably superior for most weeks than Bergwijn's been up against - apart from the obvious 2/3 teams.
Having watched both of them, I would much rather have spent less money - (but max it would have been is around 20m - Bergwijn was what 27m?) on the HG Eze who's also a year younger.