I know he just likes to go against the flow in any topic . It seems to be his thing . If it makes him happy then fair enough
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
The answer is the NFL was partly included to create extra revenue (with a very, very long ROI) but primarily to drive up the value of the club so our investors can cash in. Even he won’t argue that point
Still people have no idea (or more likely are choosing to ignore) what 'anchor tenant' means.
Levy bent over for a Yank NFL dick suck as we got cucked into overspending by half a billion to appease fat American sports-loving cunts. NFL won't pay a cent for it and we're stuck with over a billion debt and reduced to meager anchor-tenants while NFL cunts ruin our pitch every 4 weeks
Haha they don’t ruin the pitch and it generates millions every game. Just not enough to merit the extra half a bill
Website blogs better than companies house - you went there? can you see why that might be a credibility issue ... I know it's hard work clicking a few keys ... but here's the link just in case you realise how untenable your position has become. Companies House
You really are a bore. Anyone who doesn't rabidly hate enic are apologists. You are like some religious fanatic, whose pogrom is silencing any view that does not agree with your dogma.
This probably applies to half of the posters on here too. Go and set up an enic out Reddit page or something.
Last edited:
Very small portion of that goes to the club - rest is pocketed by ENIC and fat NFL Yanks
How can you possibly not be ENIC out at this point?
It’s not mate - the question is where will it be reinvested? The football club or further infrastructure
Oh dear ...... "The extra cost to make it specifically an NFL stadium goes into the hundreds of millions"
Stop drinking/smoking and posting totally unfounded nonsense ... it serves no purpose ... yes the NFL changes cost extra but 100's of millions? would a football only stadium really have been 100's of millions less? like Wembley maybe?
Mate, you are citing a 3 year old Daily Mail article that references companies house. If you believe that rag as gospel, then you have less than zero credibility
So including the NFL was to make the FOOTBALL CLUB who receive all the additional income more profitable, more able to compete with the other high income clubs in the EPL .... what a terrible idea.
Why do you hate what is so obviously beneficial for our club? it's just weird.
Investors wanting to maximise their investment would never buy a football club - even if you aren't an investor yourself you must know that. You do know that don't you?
100% not in players
What, and you think fans of the football club who want to see a change dont think YOU'RE a bore?
I'd say we find you lot FAR more boring than you find us.
MATE - Go read the source data at the companies house link now provided to you three times - it's really not that difficult. I totally agree the DM is a comic, but when they quote independently verifiable companies house numbers why are you disagreeing? just check with companies house.
Didn’t you work in finance? Would you have approved a business case with a 20 year payback? Doubt it